Psyllid-mite interactions promote psyllid fecundity by selecting for a different life history.

IF 3.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Pest Management Science Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1002/ps.8539
Pengxiang Wu, Jiaqi Xu, Ruchen Fu, Qiaoling Lin, Chang Liu, Yanan Wang
{"title":"Psyllid-mite interactions promote psyllid fecundity by selecting for a different life history.","authors":"Pengxiang Wu, Jiaqi Xu, Ruchen Fu, Qiaoling Lin, Chang Liu, Yanan Wang","doi":"10.1002/ps.8539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In interspecific competitive interactions at the same trophic level, herbivores are often hypothesized to exhibit a fast life-history strategy characterized by early reproduction and a short lifespan. Here, we analyzed the shift in life history of the psyllid Bactericera gobica when it interacts with the aphid Aphis gossypii, the thrips Frankliniella occidentalis, or the mite Aceria pallida in similar ecological niches because all of them cause damage to goji berry leaves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that psyllids displayed a typical fast life history when interacting with aphids and thrips. Psyllids that interacted with mites also reproduced earlier than those without any interactions, but later than those interacting with aphids and thrips. Trophic competition typically led to a loss of fecundity in psyllids. To mitigate this loss, psyllids that interacted with mites allocated more resources to reproduction compared to those interacting with aphids and thrips, resulting in their reproduction being spread over a longer lifespan. This life history can be best described as a bet-hedging strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that interspecific interactions cannot be solely explained by invoking faster life histories. Instead, the shift in life history may converge towards a finely-tuned match between interacting species. Interactions between psyllids and mites increase psyllid fecundity, potentially promoting the persistence of both species. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":218,"journal":{"name":"Pest Management Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pest Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.8539","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In interspecific competitive interactions at the same trophic level, herbivores are often hypothesized to exhibit a fast life-history strategy characterized by early reproduction and a short lifespan. Here, we analyzed the shift in life history of the psyllid Bactericera gobica when it interacts with the aphid Aphis gossypii, the thrips Frankliniella occidentalis, or the mite Aceria pallida in similar ecological niches because all of them cause damage to goji berry leaves.

Results: We found that psyllids displayed a typical fast life history when interacting with aphids and thrips. Psyllids that interacted with mites also reproduced earlier than those without any interactions, but later than those interacting with aphids and thrips. Trophic competition typically led to a loss of fecundity in psyllids. To mitigate this loss, psyllids that interacted with mites allocated more resources to reproduction compared to those interacting with aphids and thrips, resulting in their reproduction being spread over a longer lifespan. This life history can be best described as a bet-hedging strategy.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that interspecific interactions cannot be solely explained by invoking faster life histories. Instead, the shift in life history may converge towards a finely-tuned match between interacting species. Interactions between psyllids and mites increase psyllid fecundity, potentially promoting the persistence of both species. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虫螨之间的相互作用通过选择不同的生活史来提高虫螨的繁殖力。
背景:在同一营养级的种间竞争性相互作用中,食草动物通常被假定为表现出以早期繁殖和短寿命为特征的快速生活史策略。在此,我们分析了在相似生态位中,当伞毛虫与蚜虫、蓟马或螨虫相互作用时,其生活史的转变,因为它们都会对枸杞叶片造成危害:结果:我们发现,在与蚜虫和蓟马相互作用时,车粉虱表现出典型的快速生活史。与螨类有相互作用的牛皮藓也比没有相互作用的牛皮藓繁殖得早,但比与蚜虫和蓟马有相互作用的牛皮藓繁殖得晚。营养竞争通常会导致牛皮纸蝇的繁殖力下降。为了减轻这种损失,与螨类相互作用的牛皮藓比与蚜虫和蓟马相互作用的牛皮藓分配了更多的资源用于繁殖,从而使其繁殖期更长。这种生活史最适合描述为一种对冲策略:我们的研究表明,种间相互作用不能仅仅用更快的生活史来解释。结论:我们的研究表明,种间相互作用不能仅仅用更快的生活史来解释,相反,生活史的转变可能会使相互作用的物种之间趋于微调匹配。牛皮纸蝇与螨虫之间的相互作用会提高牛皮纸蝇的繁殖力,从而有可能促进这两个物种的持续生存。© 2024 化学工业学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pest Management Science
Pest Management Science 农林科学-昆虫学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
9.80%
发文量
553
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Pest Management Science is the international journal of research and development in crop protection and pest control. Since its launch in 1970, the journal has become the premier forum for papers on the discovery, application, and impact on the environment of products and strategies designed for pest management. Published for SCI by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
期刊最新文献
Natural UV protectants and humectants to improve the efficiency of Steinernema carpocapsae in controlling foliar pests Bee bread collected by honey bees (Apis mellifera) as a terrestrial pesticide biomarker to complement water studies. Enhancing collaboration quotient in crop protection research and development - multi-disciplinary cross-learning to promote sustainability. The evaluation on control potential using X-ray to irradiate adult Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Linalool fumigation improves mating competitiveness of males for population suppression of the global fruit pest Cydia pomonella.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1