Associations of socioeconomic status and phenotypic frailty with incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: findings from UK Biobank participants.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Chest Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.004
Zhaolong Feng, Guoxian Li, Qida He, Na Sun, Tongxing Li, Qiang Han, Hanqing Zhao, Ze Ma, Mengtong Sun, Boyan Liu, Yu Wang, Zexin Lou, Siqian Ma, Yujie Shi, Jianing Li, Ziqing Sun, Miao Jiang, Yueping Shen
{"title":"Associations of socioeconomic status and phenotypic frailty with incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: findings from UK Biobank participants.","authors":"Zhaolong Feng, Guoxian Li, Qida He, Na Sun, Tongxing Li, Qiang Han, Hanqing Zhao, Ze Ma, Mengtong Sun, Boyan Liu, Yu Wang, Zexin Lou, Siqian Ma, Yujie Shi, Jianing Li, Ziqing Sun, Miao Jiang, Yueping Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The independent, mediation, interaction, and joint effects of socioeconomic status (SES) and phenotypic frailty on the incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are unclear.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Do SES and frailty increase the risk of COPD independently or jointly ? Is there an interaction between the two factors in incident COPD? Does frailty play a mediating role between SES and COPD?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This study included 396,106 UK Biobank participants without COPD at baseline. Latent class analysis was used to define the SES of participants. Frailty was defined by the frailty phenotypes according to five factors. Cox regression models were employed to examine the associations and calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Mediation and interaction analyses were used to explain the associations between SES and frailty on COPD risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up period of 13.5 years, 12,626 individuals were diagnosed with COPD. Compared with individuals of high SES or robust, low SES (HR: 2.69, 95% CI: 2.48-2.92) or frailty (HR: 2.75, 95% CI: 2.58-2.93) increased the risk of COPD, respectively; 11.80% of the association between SES and COPD was mediated by frailty. In addition, there was a statistically significant additive interaction of low SES and frailty with COPD incidence (relative risk due to interaction: 3.591, 95% CI: 2.189-4.992; attributable proportion due to the interaction: 0.433, 95% CI: 0.276-0.589). Compared to robust individuals with high SES, frail individuals with low SES have the highest risk of COPD (HR: 7.85, 95% CI: 6.96-8.86).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Low SES and frailty are independent risk factors for COPD, and these two factors also have synergistic interaction in COPD. Frailty partially mediated the association between SES and COPD. Thus, the early identification and reversal of frailty may minimize the risk of COPD, especially in individuals with low SES.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The independent, mediation, interaction, and joint effects of socioeconomic status (SES) and phenotypic frailty on the incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are unclear.

Research question: Do SES and frailty increase the risk of COPD independently or jointly ? Is there an interaction between the two factors in incident COPD? Does frailty play a mediating role between SES and COPD?

Study design and methods: This study included 396,106 UK Biobank participants without COPD at baseline. Latent class analysis was used to define the SES of participants. Frailty was defined by the frailty phenotypes according to five factors. Cox regression models were employed to examine the associations and calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Mediation and interaction analyses were used to explain the associations between SES and frailty on COPD risk.

Results: During a median follow-up period of 13.5 years, 12,626 individuals were diagnosed with COPD. Compared with individuals of high SES or robust, low SES (HR: 2.69, 95% CI: 2.48-2.92) or frailty (HR: 2.75, 95% CI: 2.58-2.93) increased the risk of COPD, respectively; 11.80% of the association between SES and COPD was mediated by frailty. In addition, there was a statistically significant additive interaction of low SES and frailty with COPD incidence (relative risk due to interaction: 3.591, 95% CI: 2.189-4.992; attributable proportion due to the interaction: 0.433, 95% CI: 0.276-0.589). Compared to robust individuals with high SES, frail individuals with low SES have the highest risk of COPD (HR: 7.85, 95% CI: 6.96-8.86).

Interpretation: Low SES and frailty are independent risk factors for COPD, and these two factors also have synergistic interaction in COPD. Frailty partially mediated the association between SES and COPD. Thus, the early identification and reversal of frailty may minimize the risk of COPD, especially in individuals with low SES.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会经济地位和表型虚弱与慢性阻塞性肺病发病率的关系:英国生物库参与者的研究结果。
背景:社会经济地位(SES)和表型虚弱对慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)发病率的独立影响、中介影响、相互作用和联合影响尚不明确:研究问题:社会经济地位和体弱是否会单独或共同增加慢性阻塞性肺病的发病风险?这两个因素在慢性阻塞性肺病的发病中是否存在相互作用?虚弱在社会经济地位和慢性阻塞性肺病之间是否起着中介作用?本研究纳入了 396 106 名基线时未患有慢性阻塞性肺病的英国生物库参与者。采用潜类分析法对参与者的 SES 进行定义。根据五个因素对虚弱表型进行定义。采用 Cox 回归模型检验相关性,并计算出危险比 (HR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI)。采用中介分析和交互分析来解释社会经济地位和虚弱与慢性阻塞性肺病风险之间的关系:中位随访期为 13.5 年,共有 12626 人被诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病。与社会经济地位高或体格健壮的人相比,社会经济地位低(HR:2.69,95% CI:2.48-2.92)或体弱(HR:2.75,95% CI:2.58-2.93)的人罹患慢性阻塞性肺病的风险分别增加了11.80%;社会经济地位与慢性阻塞性肺病之间的关联有11.80%是由体弱介导的。此外,低社会经济地位和体弱与慢性阻塞性肺病发病率之间存在统计学意义上显著的叠加交互作用(交互作用导致的相对风险为 3.591,95% CI:2.58-2.93):3.591,95% CI:2.189-4.992;相互作用导致的可归因比例为 0.433,95% CI:0.433:0.433,95% CI:0.276-0.589)。与社会经济地位高的体格健壮者相比,社会经济地位低的体弱者罹患慢性阻塞性肺病的风险最高(HR:7.85,95% CI:6.96-8.86):低社会经济地位和体弱是慢性阻塞性肺病的独立风险因素,这两个因素在慢性阻塞性肺病中还具有协同作用。虚弱在一定程度上介导了社会经济地位与慢性阻塞性肺病之间的关系。因此,及早识别和扭转虚弱可能会将慢性阻塞性肺病的风险降至最低,尤其是在社会经济地位较低的人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
期刊最新文献
Associations of socioeconomic status and phenotypic frailty with incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: findings from UK Biobank participants. Clinical accuracy and risk of harm in asthma related content on TikTok. Effects of β-blockers on the Outcomes in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Stratified by the Presence of Comorbid Conditions: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (BNP-PL). Quantitative Computed Tomography Analysis in Rheumatoid Arthritis-Related Interstitial Lung Disease. Results of the SHARP Study: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Repeated-Measures, Crossover, Phase IV Clinical Trial of the Effect of the Wake-Promoting Agent Solriamfetol on Cognitive Function in Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Excessive Daytime Sleepiness and Cognitive Impairment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1