Oncological Outcomes Following Robotic Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer: A Worldwide Multicenter Study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY European urology focus Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.001
Alireza Ghoreifi, Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam, Anirban P Mitra, Ashish Khanna, Amitabh Singh, Julian Chavarriaga, Sol C Moon, Ahmed Saeed Goolam, Ryan Chuang, Jordan M Rich, Fady J Baky, Matthew Ho, Jacob Roberts, Inderbir S Gill, James R Porter, Nariman Ahmadi, Reza Mehrazin, John P Sfakianos, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Aditya Bagrodia, Robert J Hamilton, Scott Eggener, Sudhir Rawal, John F Ward, Hooman Djaladat
{"title":"Oncological Outcomes Following Robotic Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer: A Worldwide Multicenter Study.","authors":"Alireza Ghoreifi, Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam, Anirban P Mitra, Ashish Khanna, Amitabh Singh, Julian Chavarriaga, Sol C Moon, Ahmed Saeed Goolam, Ryan Chuang, Jordan M Rich, Fady J Baky, Matthew Ho, Jacob Roberts, Inderbir S Gill, James R Porter, Nariman Ahmadi, Reza Mehrazin, John P Sfakianos, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Aditya Bagrodia, Robert J Hamilton, Scott Eggener, Sudhir Rawal, John F Ward, Hooman Djaladat","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The feasibility and safety of a robotic approach for postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) in testicular cancer have been demonstrated, but data on long-term oncological outcomes of this procedure are limited. Our aim was to evaluate oncological outcomes following robotic PC-RPLND in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with testicular cancer treated with robotic PC-RPLND at 11 academic centers worldwide between 2011 and 2023. Patient characteristics, clinicopathological findings, and oncological outcomes were recorded. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>A total of 173 patients were included, of whom 159 underwent pure robotic PC-RPLND; 14 cases were converted to open surgery. Among the pure robotic cases, 152 (96%) had nonseminoma, 122 (77%) had International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group good risk, and 120 (76%) had a postchemotherapy mass size ≤5 cm. Salvage chemotherapy was received by ten patients (6%). Median estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay were 100 ml, 300 min, and 2 d, respectively. Final pathology revealed necrosis/fibrosis in 64 cases (40%), teratoma in 78 (49%), and viable germ-cell tumor in 17 (11%). At median follow-up of 22 mo (interquartile range 7-50), eight patients had disease recurrence, which was in-field in three cases. One port-site recurrence was identified. The median time to recurrence was 7 mo. The 4-yr RFS rate was 93%. Two cancer-related deaths were recorded. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with conversion to open surgery were more likely to have a larger preoperative mass and received salvage chemotherapy before RPLND. In addition, conversion to open surgery was associated with a higher rate of perioperative complications; however, oncological outcomes were statistically similar to those for pure robotic PC-RPLND. The main limitation of the study is its retrospective nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Robotic PC-RPLND in testicular cancer is associated with acceptable intermediate-term oncological outcomes in appropriately selected patients.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this large multicenter study, we investigated the outcomes of robotic surgery after chemotherapy for advanced testicular cancer. We found that robotic surgery yields acceptable cancer control results.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: The feasibility and safety of a robotic approach for postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) in testicular cancer have been demonstrated, but data on long-term oncological outcomes of this procedure are limited. Our aim was to evaluate oncological outcomes following robotic PC-RPLND in this setting.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with testicular cancer treated with robotic PC-RPLND at 11 academic centers worldwide between 2011 and 2023. Patient characteristics, clinicopathological findings, and oncological outcomes were recorded. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method.

Key findings and limitations: A total of 173 patients were included, of whom 159 underwent pure robotic PC-RPLND; 14 cases were converted to open surgery. Among the pure robotic cases, 152 (96%) had nonseminoma, 122 (77%) had International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group good risk, and 120 (76%) had a postchemotherapy mass size ≤5 cm. Salvage chemotherapy was received by ten patients (6%). Median estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay were 100 ml, 300 min, and 2 d, respectively. Final pathology revealed necrosis/fibrosis in 64 cases (40%), teratoma in 78 (49%), and viable germ-cell tumor in 17 (11%). At median follow-up of 22 mo (interquartile range 7-50), eight patients had disease recurrence, which was in-field in three cases. One port-site recurrence was identified. The median time to recurrence was 7 mo. The 4-yr RFS rate was 93%. Two cancer-related deaths were recorded. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with conversion to open surgery were more likely to have a larger preoperative mass and received salvage chemotherapy before RPLND. In addition, conversion to open surgery was associated with a higher rate of perioperative complications; however, oncological outcomes were statistically similar to those for pure robotic PC-RPLND. The main limitation of the study is its retrospective nature.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Robotic PC-RPLND in testicular cancer is associated with acceptable intermediate-term oncological outcomes in appropriately selected patients.

Patient summary: In this large multicenter study, we investigated the outcomes of robotic surgery after chemotherapy for advanced testicular cancer. We found that robotic surgery yields acceptable cancer control results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
睾丸癌机器人化疗后腹膜后淋巴结清扫术的肿瘤学结果:一项全球多中心研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Oncological Outcomes Following Robotic Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer: A Worldwide Multicenter Study. Is Pulse Modulation the Future of Laser Technology in Endourology: Evidence from a Literature Review - Section of EAU Endourology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1