Sensory and affective dimensions in loudness perception: Insights from young adults

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Hearing Research Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2024.109147
Charlotte Bigras , Victoria Duda , Sylvie Hébert
{"title":"Sensory and affective dimensions in loudness perception: Insights from young adults","authors":"Charlotte Bigras ,&nbsp;Victoria Duda ,&nbsp;Sylvie Hébert","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2024.109147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional psychoacoustic measures often lack accuracy in diagnosing hyperacusis and other sound tolerance disorders, possibly due to their reliance on artificial stimuli and unidimensional scales. The aim of this study was to assess loudness across sensory and affective dimensions using natural sounds, drawing on pain research wherein intensity and unpleasantness are assessed separately. We hypothesized that similar distinctions apply to loudness perception. A total of 102 young adults with normal to mild hearing loss rated 32 sound stimuli (pleasant, unpleasant, neutral, and artificial) at 10 intensities (40 to 100 dBA) on sensory and affective scales. They also completed the Hyperacusis Questionnaire, the Noise Sensitivity Scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Mixed linear models indicated both correlations and dissociations between scales that varied according to intensity and valence. Louder stimuli were rated as more unpleasant, but only at high intensities. On the sensory scale, sounds were perceived as louder with increasing intensity; however, at low to moderate intensities, pleasant and neutral sounds were rated as louder, whereas at higher intensities, artificial and unpleasant stimuli were rated as louder. On the affective scale, the perception of unpleasantness also increased with intensity, but less steeply. At high intensities, artificial stimuli were rated similarly to unpleasant stimuli. Noise sensitivity scores predicted louder and more unpleasant ratings, whereas depression scores were associated with softer and less pleasant perceptions. This study highlights the need for multidimensional approaches in audiology and suggests that the integration of sensory and affective scales with natural stimuli may improve the diagnosis and treatment of sound tolerance disorders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"454 ","pages":"Article 109147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524002004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional psychoacoustic measures often lack accuracy in diagnosing hyperacusis and other sound tolerance disorders, possibly due to their reliance on artificial stimuli and unidimensional scales. The aim of this study was to assess loudness across sensory and affective dimensions using natural sounds, drawing on pain research wherein intensity and unpleasantness are assessed separately. We hypothesized that similar distinctions apply to loudness perception. A total of 102 young adults with normal to mild hearing loss rated 32 sound stimuli (pleasant, unpleasant, neutral, and artificial) at 10 intensities (40 to 100 dBA) on sensory and affective scales. They also completed the Hyperacusis Questionnaire, the Noise Sensitivity Scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Mixed linear models indicated both correlations and dissociations between scales that varied according to intensity and valence. Louder stimuli were rated as more unpleasant, but only at high intensities. On the sensory scale, sounds were perceived as louder with increasing intensity; however, at low to moderate intensities, pleasant and neutral sounds were rated as louder, whereas at higher intensities, artificial and unpleasant stimuli were rated as louder. On the affective scale, the perception of unpleasantness also increased with intensity, but less steeply. At high intensities, artificial stimuli were rated similarly to unpleasant stimuli. Noise sensitivity scores predicted louder and more unpleasant ratings, whereas depression scores were associated with softer and less pleasant perceptions. This study highlights the need for multidimensional approaches in audiology and suggests that the integration of sensory and affective scales with natural stimuli may improve the diagnosis and treatment of sound tolerance disorders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
响度感知中的感官和情感维度:来自年轻人的启示
传统的心理声学测量方法在诊断听力障碍和其他声音耐受障碍时往往缺乏准确性,这可能是由于它们依赖于人工刺激和单维度量表。本研究的目的是利用自然声音从感官和情感两个维度对响度进行评估,并借鉴疼痛研究中分别评估强度和不愉快程度的方法。我们假设类似的区分也适用于响度感知。共有 102 名听力正常至轻度受损的年轻人对 10 种强度(40 至 100 分贝)的 32 种声音刺激(愉快、不愉快、中性和人工)进行了感官和情感评分。他们还填写了听力障碍问卷、噪音敏感度量表和医院焦虑抑郁量表。混合线性模型显示,不同强度和情绪的量表之间存在相关性和不相关性。大音量的刺激被评为更令人不愉快,但只有在高强度时才会如此。在感觉量表上,声音随着强度的增加而被认为变大;然而,在中低强度下,愉快和中性的声音被认为变大,而在较高强度下,人为和不愉快的刺激被认为变大。在情感量表中,不愉快感也随着强度的增加而增加,但增加的幅度较小。在高强度下,人工刺激与不愉快刺激的评分相似。噪音敏感度得分预示着声音更大、更令人不愉快的评价,而抑郁得分则与声音更柔和、更令人不愉快的感知有关。这项研究强调了听力学中多维方法的必要性,并表明将感觉和情感量表与自然刺激相结合可能会改善声耐受障碍的诊断和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Research
Hearing Research 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
163
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles. Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.
期刊最新文献
The therapeutic effect and underlying biochemical mechanism of methylprednisolone and D-methionine in “rescuing” noise-induced hearing loss in guinea pigs Silicone-based AC102-loaded cochlear implant coatings protect residual hearing in an animal model of cochlear implantation Impaired brainstem auditory evoked potentials after in utero exposure to high dose paracetamol exposure Sensory and affective dimensions in loudness perception: Insights from young adults Phoneme-related potentials recorded from normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users in a selective attention paradigm to continuous speech
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1