Deep Learning Algorithm for Keratoconus Detection from Tomographic Maps and Corneal Biomechanics: A Diagnostic Study.

IF 1.2 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Current Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-10-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/joco.joco_18_24
Wiyada Quanchareonsap, Ngamjit Kasetsuwan, Usanee Reinprayoon, Yonrawee Piyacomn, Thitima Wungcharoen, Monthira Jermjutitham
{"title":"Deep Learning Algorithm for Keratoconus Detection from Tomographic Maps and Corneal Biomechanics: A Diagnostic Study.","authors":"Wiyada Quanchareonsap, Ngamjit Kasetsuwan, Usanee Reinprayoon, Yonrawee Piyacomn, Thitima Wungcharoen, Monthira Jermjutitham","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_18_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) approach for differentiating between normal cornea, subclinical, and keratoconus (KC) using tomographic maps from Pentacam (Oculus) and corneal biomechanics from Corvis ST (Oculus).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,668 tomographic (769 patients) and 611 biomechanical (307 patients) images from the Chula Refractive Surgery Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital were included. The sample size was divided into the Pentacam and combined Pentacam-Corvis groups. Different convolutional neural network approaches were used to enhance the KC and subclinical KC detection performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI model 1, which obtained refractive maps from Pentacam, achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.938 and accuracy of 0.947 (sensitivity, 90.8% and specificity, 96.9%). AI model 2, which added dynamic corneal response and the Vinciguerra screening report from Corvis ST to AI Model 1, achieved an AUC of 0.985 and accuracy of 0.956 (sensitivity, 93.0% and specificity, 94.3%). AI model 3, which added the corneal biomechanical index to AI Model 2, reached an AUC of 0.991 and accuracy of 0.956 (sensitivity, 93.0% and specificity, 94.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study showed that AI models using either anterior corneal curvature alone or combined with corneal biomechanics could help classify normal and keratoconic corneas, which would make diagnosis more accurate and would be helpful in decision-making for the treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":"36 1","pages":"46-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_18_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) approach for differentiating between normal cornea, subclinical, and keratoconus (KC) using tomographic maps from Pentacam (Oculus) and corneal biomechanics from Corvis ST (Oculus).

Methods: A total of 1,668 tomographic (769 patients) and 611 biomechanical (307 patients) images from the Chula Refractive Surgery Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital were included. The sample size was divided into the Pentacam and combined Pentacam-Corvis groups. Different convolutional neural network approaches were used to enhance the KC and subclinical KC detection performance.

Results: AI model 1, which obtained refractive maps from Pentacam, achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.938 and accuracy of 0.947 (sensitivity, 90.8% and specificity, 96.9%). AI model 2, which added dynamic corneal response and the Vinciguerra screening report from Corvis ST to AI Model 1, achieved an AUC of 0.985 and accuracy of 0.956 (sensitivity, 93.0% and specificity, 94.3%). AI model 3, which added the corneal biomechanical index to AI Model 2, reached an AUC of 0.991 and accuracy of 0.956 (sensitivity, 93.0% and specificity, 94.3%).

Conclusions: Our study showed that AI models using either anterior corneal curvature alone or combined with corneal biomechanics could help classify normal and keratoconic corneas, which would make diagnosis more accurate and would be helpful in decision-making for the treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从断层扫描图和角膜生物力学检测角膜炎的深度学习算法:诊断研究。
目的:利用 Pentacam(Oculus)的断层扫描图和 Corvis ST(Oculus)的角膜生物力学图,开发一种区分正常角膜、亚临床角膜和角膜屈光不正(KC)的人工智能(AI)方法:方法:共纳入了来自朱拉隆功国王纪念医院 Chula 屈光手术中心的 1,668 张断层扫描图像(769 名患者)和 611 张生物力学图像(307 名患者)。样本分为 Pentacam 组和 Pentacam-Corvis 组合组。采用不同的卷积神经网络方法来提高 KC 和亚临床 KC 的检测性能:人工智能模型 1 从 Pentacam 中获取屈光图,其接收器工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.938,准确率为 0.947(灵敏度为 90.8%,特异性为 96.9%)。人工智能模型 2 在人工智能模型 1 的基础上增加了动态角膜反应和 Corvis ST 的 Vinciguerra 筛查报告,其 AUC 为 0.985,准确率为 0.956(灵敏度为 93.0%,特异性为 94.3%)。人工智能模型 3 在人工智能模型 2 的基础上增加了角膜生物力学指数,其 AUC 为 0.991,准确率为 0.956(灵敏度为 93.0%,特异性为 94.3%):我们的研究表明,单独使用角膜前曲率或结合角膜生物力学的人工智能模型有助于对正常角膜和角膜炎角膜进行分类,从而使诊断更加准确,并有助于治疗决策的制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Eplerenone Treatment in Patients with Central Serous Retinopathy: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Evaluation and Comparison of the Knowledge Levels of Current Artificial Intelligence Programs on Retinal/Vitreous Diseases and Treatment Methods. Evaluation of the Activity of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease; A Comparison of Indocyanine Green Angiography Scoring, Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography, and Choroidal Vascularity Index. How Safe is Nd: YAG Laser Capsulotomy in Patients with Uveitis? Outcomes of a Long-Term Study. Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Lacrimal Gland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1