Barriers to Effective Prehospital and Hyperacute Stroke Care in India: A Physician Perspective.

IF 1.2 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.4103/jets.jets_156_23
Siju V Abraham, Anita Joy, Ankit Kumar Sahu, Prithvishree Ravindra, Shirshendu Dhar, Ravi Teja, S Vimal Krishnan, Renyu Liu, Anthony George Rudd, Gary A Ford
{"title":"Barriers to Effective Prehospital and Hyperacute Stroke Care in India: A Physician Perspective.","authors":"Siju V Abraham, Anita Joy, Ankit Kumar Sahu, Prithvishree Ravindra, Shirshendu Dhar, Ravi Teja, S Vimal Krishnan, Renyu Liu, Anthony George Rudd, Gary A Ford","doi":"10.4103/jets.jets_156_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The incidence of stroke is increasing in India. Prehospital stroke care is crucial for reducing stroke morbidity and mortality, but its implementation in India faces several challenges. Limited original research exists on prehospital stroke care in India, making it essential to identify the problems in implementing effective prehospital stroke care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey was conducted among registered medical practitioners in India who treat acute stroke. The survey questionnaire was developed in English and included 26 questions divided into five parts: questions about the physician's practice setup/hospital in India, perception of community awareness, existing prehospital care/systems, in-hospital stroke care availability, and specific issues faced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-three doctors in India participated in the survey (43% response rate). Most of the respondents worked in private hospitals (68%) and urban areas (76%). While 89% of hospitals had ambulance services, over 33% reported that patients had to pay for ambulance transport. Among respondents, 12% reported a community stroke care network, with infrequent prehospital procedures such as random blood glucose measurement (22%), stroke identification (15.7%), \"last seen normal\" documentation (14.5%), and low prehospital notification to hospitals (5%). Delays in referral from peripheral centers were reported by 73% of respondents. Most hospitals had standard operating procedures (SOPs) (84%), computed tomography (CT) (94%), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (85%), and offered intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) (77%). However, 24 h availability of CT was reported only by 6%, MRI by 19% and IVT by 12%. Nearly half (45%) reported treatment with thrombolysis was not covered by insurance. Mechanical thrombectomy was available in 34% of hospitals and 63% of hospitals conducted in-hospital audits for stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The capabilities of stroke-catering hospitals in urban settings are encouraging, with many having SOPs, imaging capabilities, and thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy services. However, there is much room for improvement, in making the essential stroke care services financially accessible to all and available around the clock.</p>","PeriodicalId":15692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","volume":"17 3","pages":"129-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_156_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of stroke is increasing in India. Prehospital stroke care is crucial for reducing stroke morbidity and mortality, but its implementation in India faces several challenges. Limited original research exists on prehospital stroke care in India, making it essential to identify the problems in implementing effective prehospital stroke care.

Methods: A web-based survey was conducted among registered medical practitioners in India who treat acute stroke. The survey questionnaire was developed in English and included 26 questions divided into five parts: questions about the physician's practice setup/hospital in India, perception of community awareness, existing prehospital care/systems, in-hospital stroke care availability, and specific issues faced.

Results: Eighty-three doctors in India participated in the survey (43% response rate). Most of the respondents worked in private hospitals (68%) and urban areas (76%). While 89% of hospitals had ambulance services, over 33% reported that patients had to pay for ambulance transport. Among respondents, 12% reported a community stroke care network, with infrequent prehospital procedures such as random blood glucose measurement (22%), stroke identification (15.7%), "last seen normal" documentation (14.5%), and low prehospital notification to hospitals (5%). Delays in referral from peripheral centers were reported by 73% of respondents. Most hospitals had standard operating procedures (SOPs) (84%), computed tomography (CT) (94%), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (85%), and offered intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) (77%). However, 24 h availability of CT was reported only by 6%, MRI by 19% and IVT by 12%. Nearly half (45%) reported treatment with thrombolysis was not covered by insurance. Mechanical thrombectomy was available in 34% of hospitals and 63% of hospitals conducted in-hospital audits for stroke patients.

Conclusions: The capabilities of stroke-catering hospitals in urban settings are encouraging, with many having SOPs, imaging capabilities, and thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy services. However, there is much room for improvement, in making the essential stroke care services financially accessible to all and available around the clock.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度院前和急性卒中有效救治的障碍:医生的视角。
简介印度的中风发病率正在上升。院前卒中救治对降低卒中发病率和死亡率至关重要,但在印度实施院前卒中救治面临着诸多挑战。有关印度院前卒中救治的原创性研究有限,因此必须找出在实施有效院前卒中救治过程中存在的问题:方法:对印度治疗急性卒中的注册医师进行了一项网络调查。调查问卷用英语编写,包括 26 个问题,分为五个部分:关于医生在印度的执业机构/医院、对社区意识的看法、现有院前救治/系统、院内卒中救治的可用性以及面临的具体问题:印度有 83 名医生参与了调查(回复率为 43%)。大多数受访者在私立医院(68%)和城市地区(76%)工作。虽然 89% 的医院有救护车服务,但超过 33% 的医院表示病人必须支付救护车费用。在受访者中,12% 的人报告了社区卒中救治网络,但院前程序并不频繁,如随机血糖测量(22%)、卒中识别(15.7%)、"最后一次就诊正常 "记录(14.5%),以及院前通知医院率低(5%)。73% 的受访者报告了外围中心转诊的延误。大多数医院制定了标准操作程序 (SOP)(84%)、计算机断层扫描 (CT)(94%)、磁共振成像 (MRI)(85%),并提供静脉溶栓 (IVT)(77%)。然而,仅有 6% 的医院报告称可在 24 小时内进行 CT 检查,19% 的医院报告称可进行 MRI 检查,12% 的医院报告称可进行 IVT 检查。近一半(45%)的患者表示溶栓治疗不在保险范围内。34%的医院提供机械溶栓治疗,63%的医院对中风患者进行院内审核:结论:城市中卒中治疗医院的能力令人鼓舞,许多医院拥有标准操作程序、成像能力、溶栓和机械取栓服务。然而,在使所有人都能在经济上获得必要的卒中护理服务并能全天候提供服务方面,仍有很大的改进空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lemierre's Syndrome Complicated by Venous Stroke due to a Massive Cerebral Venous Thrombus. Prehospital Care for Road Traffic Injury Victims. A Randomized Trial Assessing the Effectiveness of High-fidelity Simulation Training in Managing Maternal Cardiac Arrest among Emergency Medical Professionals in India. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prehospital Plasma Administration for Hemorrhagic Shock. Factors Influencing Treatment Delays in Trauma Patients: A Three-delay Model Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1