Susanna Aba Abraham, Francis Annor, Obed Cudjoe, Benjamin Kofi Anumel, Dorcas Frempomaa Agyare, Benedict Osei Tawiah, Florence Djoletoe, Raphael Adu-Gyamfi, Kwadwo Koduah Owusu, Anthony Ashinyo, Dorcas Obiri-Yeboah
{"title":"\"They are trying their best\": incarcerated individuals' assessment of general healthcare services in selected Ghanaian prisons.","authors":"Susanna Aba Abraham, Francis Annor, Obed Cudjoe, Benjamin Kofi Anumel, Dorcas Frempomaa Agyare, Benedict Osei Tawiah, Florence Djoletoe, Raphael Adu-Gyamfi, Kwadwo Koduah Owusu, Anthony Ashinyo, Dorcas Obiri-Yeboah","doi":"10.1186/s40352-024-00298-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organization (WHO) has indicated that the absence of prison health poses a threat to public health, making it important to safeguard access to quality healthcare for incarcerated populations. Although several studies have explored the quality of care in prisons, there is a dearth of empirical evidence on the perspectives of incarcerated individuals. This study investigated incarcerated individuals' perspectives and opinions on the general healthcare services in Ghanaian prisons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing a qualitative approach, focus group discussions were conducted with 51 incarcerated individuals in five prisons sited in the Northern, Middle and Southern zones of Ghana. Thematic analysis following the tradition of Braun and Clarke was conducted. Four of the six constructs of the WHO Health Systems Framework - service delivery, health workforce, access to essential medicines, and leadership and guidance - were applied deductively to organise the data into themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were generated from the analysis: \"Health service delivery\", \"Health workforce in prisons\", \"Access to essential medicines\" and \"Leadership; regulating healthcare services\". Participants rated health services in prisons as below average compared to those available to the general population. The use of nurses as prescribers in prison infirmaries, though consistent with Ghana Health Service policy, seems to negatively influence prisoners' perceptions of the quality of the health workforce in prisons. Lack of basic equipment and essential medications at the infirmary for common endemic conditions such as malaria coupled with the bureaucratic processes required to access care outside of the prison also negatively affected incarcerated individuals' perceptions of the quality of health care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incarcerated individuals perceived that the quality of health services provided in prisons was inferior to that provided in the general population. Addressing challenges associated with the unavailability of essential drugs and equipment, improving the number of health staff, and addressing bottlenecks in accessing urgent care will enhance the experiences of incarcerated populations on the quality of care given.</p>","PeriodicalId":37843,"journal":{"name":"Health and Justice","volume":"12 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-024-00298-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has indicated that the absence of prison health poses a threat to public health, making it important to safeguard access to quality healthcare for incarcerated populations. Although several studies have explored the quality of care in prisons, there is a dearth of empirical evidence on the perspectives of incarcerated individuals. This study investigated incarcerated individuals' perspectives and opinions on the general healthcare services in Ghanaian prisons.
Methods: Utilizing a qualitative approach, focus group discussions were conducted with 51 incarcerated individuals in five prisons sited in the Northern, Middle and Southern zones of Ghana. Thematic analysis following the tradition of Braun and Clarke was conducted. Four of the six constructs of the WHO Health Systems Framework - service delivery, health workforce, access to essential medicines, and leadership and guidance - were applied deductively to organise the data into themes and subthemes.
Results: Four themes were generated from the analysis: "Health service delivery", "Health workforce in prisons", "Access to essential medicines" and "Leadership; regulating healthcare services". Participants rated health services in prisons as below average compared to those available to the general population. The use of nurses as prescribers in prison infirmaries, though consistent with Ghana Health Service policy, seems to negatively influence prisoners' perceptions of the quality of the health workforce in prisons. Lack of basic equipment and essential medications at the infirmary for common endemic conditions such as malaria coupled with the bureaucratic processes required to access care outside of the prison also negatively affected incarcerated individuals' perceptions of the quality of health care.
Conclusions: Incarcerated individuals perceived that the quality of health services provided in prisons was inferior to that provided in the general population. Addressing challenges associated with the unavailability of essential drugs and equipment, improving the number of health staff, and addressing bottlenecks in accessing urgent care will enhance the experiences of incarcerated populations on the quality of care given.
期刊介绍：
Health & Justice is open to submissions from public health, criminology and criminal justice, medical science, psychology and clinical sciences, sociology, neuroscience, biology, anthropology and the social sciences, and covers a broad array of research types. It publishes original research, research notes (promising issues that are smaller in scope), commentaries, and translational notes (possible ways of introducing innovations in the justice system). Health & Justice aims to: Present original experimental research on the area of health and well-being of people involved in the adult or juvenile justice system, including people who work in the system; Present meta-analysis or systematic reviews in the area of health and justice for those involved in the justice system; Provide an arena to present new and upcoming scientific issues; Present translational science—the movement of scientific findings into practice including programs, procedures, or strategies; Present implementation science findings to advance the uptake and use of evidence-based practices; and, Present protocols and clinical practice guidelines. As an open access journal, Health & Justice aims for a broad reach, including researchers across many disciplines as well as justice practitioners (e.g. judges, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers, treatment providers, mental health and medical personnel working with justice-involved individuals, etc.). The sections of the journal devoted to translational and implementation sciences are primarily geared to practitioners and justice actors with special attention to the techniques used.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
