Analyzing Epidemiology and Hospital Course Outcomes of LeFort Fractures in the Largest National Pediatric Trauma Database.

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1177/19433875241262616
Sofia Perez Otero, Michael F Cassidy, Kerry A Morrison, Hilliard T Brydges, John Muller, Roberto L Flores, Daniel J Ceradini
{"title":"Analyzing Epidemiology and Hospital Course Outcomes of LeFort Fractures in the Largest National Pediatric Trauma Database.","authors":"Sofia Perez Otero, Michael F Cassidy, Kerry A Morrison, Hilliard T Brydges, John Muller, Roberto L Flores, Daniel J Ceradini","doi":"10.1177/19433875241262616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study analyzes the epidemiology of pediatric Le Fort fractures and assesses the incidence of concomitant injuries and acute-level hospital course using the largest, national pediatric trauma database to date.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pediatric midface and Le Fort fractures from 2016-2019 were identified in the National Trauma Data Bank. Descriptive analyses of Le Fort compared to non-Le Fort midface fractures were performed. Multivariable regression assessed whether Le Fort fractures were risk factors for ICU admission, intracranial injury, cervical spine (C-spine) fracture, tracheostomy, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1489 patients with Le Fort fractures were identified. There were 520 Le Fort I, 632 Le Fort II, and 609 Le Fort III fractures. Fracture incidence increased with age. Le Fort fractures showed higher rates of concomitant intracranial injury (<i>P</i> < 0.001), ICU admission (<i>P</i> < 0.001), C-spine fracture (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and tracheostomy (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Incidence of all the above increased with higher-grade Le Fort fractures. Le Fort III fractures had higher rates of mortality than non-Le Fort midface fractures (7.6% vs 3.2%). Multivariable regression showed that all Le Fort patterns were independent risk factors for tracheostomy and ICU admission, but only Le Fort I for C-spine fractures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of Le Fort fractures appears to increase with age. Higher category Le Fort fractures are associated with greater morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"19433875241262616"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875241262616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective observational study.

Objective: This study analyzes the epidemiology of pediatric Le Fort fractures and assesses the incidence of concomitant injuries and acute-level hospital course using the largest, national pediatric trauma database to date.

Methods: Pediatric midface and Le Fort fractures from 2016-2019 were identified in the National Trauma Data Bank. Descriptive analyses of Le Fort compared to non-Le Fort midface fractures were performed. Multivariable regression assessed whether Le Fort fractures were risk factors for ICU admission, intracranial injury, cervical spine (C-spine) fracture, tracheostomy, and mortality.

Results: A total of 1489 patients with Le Fort fractures were identified. There were 520 Le Fort I, 632 Le Fort II, and 609 Le Fort III fractures. Fracture incidence increased with age. Le Fort fractures showed higher rates of concomitant intracranial injury (P < 0.001), ICU admission (P < 0.001), C-spine fracture (P < 0.001), and tracheostomy (P < 0.001). Incidence of all the above increased with higher-grade Le Fort fractures. Le Fort III fractures had higher rates of mortality than non-Le Fort midface fractures (7.6% vs 3.2%). Multivariable regression showed that all Le Fort patterns were independent risk factors for tracheostomy and ICU admission, but only Le Fort I for C-spine fractures.

Conclusions: The incidence of Le Fort fractures appears to increase with age. Higher category Le Fort fractures are associated with greater morbidity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在最大的全国儿科创伤数据库中分析 LeFort 骨折的流行病学和住院治疗结果。
研究设计回顾性观察研究:本研究利用迄今为止最大的全国性儿科创伤数据库,分析了小儿Le Fort骨折的流行病学,并评估了伴随损伤的发生率和急性住院治疗过程:在国家创伤数据库中确定了2016-2019年的小儿中面部和Le Fort骨折。对Le Fort与非Le Fort中面部骨折进行了描述性分析。多变量回归评估了Le Fort骨折是否是入住ICU、颅内损伤、颈椎(C-spine)骨折、气管切开术和死亡率的风险因素:共确定了 1489 名 Le Fort 骨折患者。结果:共发现 1489 例 Le Fort 骨折患者,其中 Le Fort I 型骨折 520 例,Le Fort II 型骨折 632 例,Le Fort III 型骨折 609 例。骨折发生率随年龄增长而增加。Le Fort骨折患者合并颅内损伤(P < 0.001)、入住重症监护室(P < 0.001)、C型脊柱骨折(P < 0.001)和气管切开术(P < 0.001)的比例较高。随着Le Fort骨折等级的升高,上述情况的发生率也随之升高。Le Fort III骨折的死亡率高于非Le Fort中面骨折(7.6% vs 3.2%)。多变量回归显示,所有Le Fort模式都是气管切开术和入住重症监护室的独立风险因素,但只有Le Fort I是C型脊柱骨折的独立风险因素:结论:Le Fort骨折的发生率似乎随着年龄的增长而增加。结论:Le Fort骨折的发生率似乎随着年龄的增长而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Guidelines for Orbital Defect Assessment and Patient-Specific Implant Design: Introducing OA2 (Orbital Assessment Algorithm). Moving Forward: The Last Subscription Issue and the Dawn of Open Access. Opportunity Cost of Surgical Management of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma: A Longitudinal Study. Does More Invasive Surgery Result in Higher Patient Satisfaction? A Long-Term Follow-Up of 136 Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures. Microvascular Reconstructions in Elderly Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma - Too Old for Surgical Treatment?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1