(Mis)perception in Social Mobility: Optimistic Bias for Personal (but not Societal) Mobility Beliefs.

IF 2.9 4区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Spanish Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1017/SJP.2024.23
Juan Matamoros-Lima, Guillermo Byrd Willis, Ginés Navarro-Carrillo, Miguel Moya
{"title":"(Mis)perception in Social Mobility: Optimistic Bias for Personal (but not Societal) Mobility Beliefs.","authors":"Juan Matamoros-Lima, Guillermo Byrd Willis, Ginés Navarro-Carrillo, Miguel Moya","doi":"10.1017/SJP.2024.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive biases affect how people perceive social class mobility. Previous studies suggest that people find it difficult to estimate actual economic social mobility accurately. These results have also noted differences between regions. While in the United States people overestimate actual economic social mobility, in Europe people tend to underestimate it. Across two independent cross-sectional studies, we examined whether cognitive biases operate in the Spanish context and, if so, whether they depend on the type of social mobility. In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 480), we tested whether people in Spain have an accurate estimation of actual upward economic societal mobility. The results showed that people in Spain have a pessimistic view of upward societal mobility. In Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 274), we analyzed whether people in Spain are more or less optimistic according to the type of social mobility: Personal vs. societal. We found that Spaniards are more optimistic when estimating their own mobility (i.e., personal mobility) than when estimating the mobility of the Spanish society (i.e., societal mobility). Contrary to our predictions, we found that meritocratic beliefs do not play a relevant role in determining any type of social mobility. These results extend previous research on social mobility and its psychosocial consequences. Furthermore, they are well aligned with a new psychosocial perspective suggesting that social mobility is a multidimensional construct. We also discussed the psychosocial implications of this optimistic bias for personal mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":54309,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychology","volume":"27 ","pages":"e29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2024.23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive biases affect how people perceive social class mobility. Previous studies suggest that people find it difficult to estimate actual economic social mobility accurately. These results have also noted differences between regions. While in the United States people overestimate actual economic social mobility, in Europe people tend to underestimate it. Across two independent cross-sectional studies, we examined whether cognitive biases operate in the Spanish context and, if so, whether they depend on the type of social mobility. In Study 1 (N = 480), we tested whether people in Spain have an accurate estimation of actual upward economic societal mobility. The results showed that people in Spain have a pessimistic view of upward societal mobility. In Study 2 (N = 274), we analyzed whether people in Spain are more or less optimistic according to the type of social mobility: Personal vs. societal. We found that Spaniards are more optimistic when estimating their own mobility (i.e., personal mobility) than when estimating the mobility of the Spanish society (i.e., societal mobility). Contrary to our predictions, we found that meritocratic beliefs do not play a relevant role in determining any type of social mobility. These results extend previous research on social mobility and its psychosocial consequences. Furthermore, they are well aligned with a new psychosocial perspective suggesting that social mobility is a multidimensional construct. We also discussed the psychosocial implications of this optimistic bias for personal mobility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(社会流动的(错误)认知:个人(而非社会)流动信念的乐观偏差。
认知偏差会影响人们对社会阶层流动性的认知。以往的研究表明,人们很难准确估计实际的社会经济流动性。这些研究结果也注意到了地区之间的差异。在美国,人们会高估实际的经济社会流动性,而在欧洲,人们往往会低估它。通过两项独立的横截面研究,我们考察了认知偏差在西班牙是否存在,如果存在,它们是否取决于社会流动的类型。在研究 1(N = 480)中,我们测试了西班牙人是否准确估计了实际的社会经济向上流动性。结果显示,西班牙人对社会向上流动性持悲观态度。在研究 2(N = 274)中,我们根据社会流动的类型分析了西班牙人的乐观程度是高还是低:个人流动与社会流动。我们发现,西班牙人在估计自己的流动性(即个人流动性)时比估计西班牙社会的流动性(即社会流动性)时更乐观。与我们的预测相反,我们发现任人唯贤的信念在决定任何类型的社会流动性方面都没有发挥相关作用。这些结果扩展了之前关于社会流动性及其社会心理后果的研究。此外,这些结果与新的社会心理视角非常吻合,新的社会心理视角认为社会流动性是一个多维度的结构。我们还讨论了这种乐观偏差对个人流动性的社会心理影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spanish Journal of Psychology
Spanish Journal of Psychology Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Spanish Journal of Psychology is published with the aim of promoting the international dissemination of relevant empirical research and theoretical and methodological proposals in the various areas of specialization within psychology. The first Spanish journal with an international scope published entirely in English.
期刊最新文献
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Suicide Cognitions Scale-Revised (SCS-R) in Spanish Adolescents in Residential Care. (Mis)perception in Social Mobility: Optimistic Bias for Personal (but not Societal) Mobility Beliefs. Gender Matters: A Critical Piece in Mental Health. Exploring Comorbidity Between Anxiety and Depression in Spanish-Speaking School-Aged Children: A Network Analysis Approach. Athlete Portraits in News: Influence of Media Representation and Gender on Social Perception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1