Do I need to go to a skilled nursing facility? Hospital discharges to SNF during and after the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19267
Marianne Tschoe MD, Charles Olvera MA, MS, Anna Liggett MD, Jennifer Woodward MD, Vanessa Ramirez-Zohfeld MPH, Lee A. Lindquist MD, MPH, MBA
{"title":"Do I need to go to a skilled nursing facility? Hospital discharges to SNF during and after the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Marianne Tschoe MD,&nbsp;Charles Olvera MA, MS,&nbsp;Anna Liggett MD,&nbsp;Jennifer Woodward MD,&nbsp;Vanessa Ramirez-Zohfeld MPH,&nbsp;Lee A. Lindquist MD, MPH, MBA","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hospitalized patients who need rehabilitation or continued medical care are often discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) for ongoing treatment. During the early years of the COVID-19 pandemic, overburdened hospitals were heavily strained, so the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) waived its 3-day rule to obtain SNF care, effective March 1, 2020.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Patients no longer had to meet inpatient criteria or remain hospitalized for 3 days to transfer to SNFs. We sought to characterize trends in hospital discharges to SNF during the COVID-19 pandemic waiver.</p><p>As part of a discharge to SNF metric at an urban academic medical center, a database was created utilizing a retrospective cohort of Medicare beneficiaries who used hospital inpatient services, specifically examining those patients who were discharged to a SNF for additional care. Variables (age, concurrent depression diagnosis, length of stay, and ICU admission) were chosen to gauge severity of illness. Secondary data analysis was conducted, parsing the information into 3 years: March 2020–February 2021 (COVID Year 1), March 2021–February 2022 (Year 2), and March 2022–February 2023 (Year 3) and analyzed using univariate and chi-square analyses.</p><p>We examined 674 discharges to SNF across 607 individuals (Figure 1). Approximately 11% (<i>n</i> = 73) of discharges occurred in Year 1, 24% (<i>n</i> = 164) in Year 2, and 65% (<i>n</i> = 437) in Year 3. The mean preceding hospital stay in Years 1 and 2 was 12.0 versus 10.1 days in Year 3 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). In Year 1, no individual was held for fewer than 3 days before discharge to an SNF. Approximately 41% of discharges to SNF were preceded by an ICU stay in Year 1 versus 20% in Year 2 and 19% in Year 3, representing a significant decrease in the proportion of ICU stays between COVID Years (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Mean age at discharge declined across years 1–3, from 84.84 in Y1, to 84.29 in Y2, to 83.54 in Yr3. The age decline between Years 2 and 3, from 84 in Year 2 to 79 in Year 3 was significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The proportion of patients discharged to SNF who had a depression diagnosis lessened significantly between years: 26% in Year 1 versus 12% in Year 2 versus 16% in Year 3 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.03).</p><p>This study is the first to examine hospital discharges to SNF over the three-year course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Hospital discharges to SNF were the lowest during the first year of the pandemic when severity of illness was the highest. Absence of a vaccine and facility visitor restrictions could have prompted patients and their families to choose discharge to home rather than SNF. Residents in long-term care facilities accounted for 37.7% of COVID-19 deaths in the United States by the end of 2020,<span><sup>2</sup></span> when the vaccine first became available. Visitor restrictions during the pandemic have been associated with increased emotional distress among patients and their families.<span><sup>3</sup></span> These variables could explain why SNFs paradoxically had fewer admissions despite higher severity of illness.</p><p>As the pandemic receded and COVID-19 was less deadly due to the emergence of vaccinations, discharges to SNF increased while severity of illness decreased. Patients had shorter hospitalizations and fewer ICU stays. Mean age and proportion of patients with depression also declined. Waiver of CMS' 3-day rule could partially explain this finding. Patients hospitalized under observation status previously were not eligible for SNF admission. The waiver removed this barrier to entry.</p><p>These findings suggest that perhaps more older adult patients could have returned home instead of transferring to an SNF. During the pandemic, hospitalized older adults discharged with home health services had lower rates of 30-day rehospitalization than before.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Patients who completed home health services had excellent symptom improvement and functional outcomes.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Future research could investigate the factors that led to successful home discharge during the pandemic and whether they could be replicated now that it is over.</p><p>One limitation of this study is that it occurred at a single urban academic center. Results may not be generalizable to other settings. Other studies have observed a decline in SNF admissions during the first year of the pandemic,<span><sup>6, 7</sup></span> thus corroborating some of our findings. In addition, more qualitative information would be helpful in determining how decisions on discharge location (SNF vs. home) were made.</p><p>Hospital discharges to SNF were the lowest during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and increased over time. Severity of illness decreased throughout the course of the pandemic. Our results pose the question whether, with proper support, more older adults could be discharged to home rather than SNF after hospitalization.</p><p>All authors met criteria for authorship by (1) providing substantial intellectual contribution to the study's conception and design (MT, AL, JW, LAL, VRZ.), data acquisition (MT, CO, LAL), data analysis (MT, CO, LAL), and interpretation (all authors); drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content (all authors); and approving the final version to be published (all authors).</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>The sponsor was not involved in the design, methods, analysis and interpretation of the data, and preparation of the manuscript.</p><p>This research is supported through grants from the NIH/NIA R01AG058777, R01AG068421, R01AG083034, and P30AG059988.</p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 2","pages":"651-653"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19267","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hospitalized patients who need rehabilitation or continued medical care are often discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) for ongoing treatment. During the early years of the COVID-19 pandemic, overburdened hospitals were heavily strained, so the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) waived its 3-day rule to obtain SNF care, effective March 1, 2020.1 Patients no longer had to meet inpatient criteria or remain hospitalized for 3 days to transfer to SNFs. We sought to characterize trends in hospital discharges to SNF during the COVID-19 pandemic waiver.

As part of a discharge to SNF metric at an urban academic medical center, a database was created utilizing a retrospective cohort of Medicare beneficiaries who used hospital inpatient services, specifically examining those patients who were discharged to a SNF for additional care. Variables (age, concurrent depression diagnosis, length of stay, and ICU admission) were chosen to gauge severity of illness. Secondary data analysis was conducted, parsing the information into 3 years: March 2020–February 2021 (COVID Year 1), March 2021–February 2022 (Year 2), and March 2022–February 2023 (Year 3) and analyzed using univariate and chi-square analyses.

We examined 674 discharges to SNF across 607 individuals (Figure 1). Approximately 11% (n = 73) of discharges occurred in Year 1, 24% (n = 164) in Year 2, and 65% (n = 437) in Year 3. The mean preceding hospital stay in Years 1 and 2 was 12.0 versus 10.1 days in Year 3 (p < 0.05). In Year 1, no individual was held for fewer than 3 days before discharge to an SNF. Approximately 41% of discharges to SNF were preceded by an ICU stay in Year 1 versus 20% in Year 2 and 19% in Year 3, representing a significant decrease in the proportion of ICU stays between COVID Years (p < 0.0001). Mean age at discharge declined across years 1–3, from 84.84 in Y1, to 84.29 in Y2, to 83.54 in Yr3. The age decline between Years 2 and 3, from 84 in Year 2 to 79 in Year 3 was significant (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients discharged to SNF who had a depression diagnosis lessened significantly between years: 26% in Year 1 versus 12% in Year 2 versus 16% in Year 3 (p < 0.03).

This study is the first to examine hospital discharges to SNF over the three-year course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Hospital discharges to SNF were the lowest during the first year of the pandemic when severity of illness was the highest. Absence of a vaccine and facility visitor restrictions could have prompted patients and their families to choose discharge to home rather than SNF. Residents in long-term care facilities accounted for 37.7% of COVID-19 deaths in the United States by the end of 2020,2 when the vaccine first became available. Visitor restrictions during the pandemic have been associated with increased emotional distress among patients and their families.3 These variables could explain why SNFs paradoxically had fewer admissions despite higher severity of illness.

As the pandemic receded and COVID-19 was less deadly due to the emergence of vaccinations, discharges to SNF increased while severity of illness decreased. Patients had shorter hospitalizations and fewer ICU stays. Mean age and proportion of patients with depression also declined. Waiver of CMS' 3-day rule could partially explain this finding. Patients hospitalized under observation status previously were not eligible for SNF admission. The waiver removed this barrier to entry.

These findings suggest that perhaps more older adult patients could have returned home instead of transferring to an SNF. During the pandemic, hospitalized older adults discharged with home health services had lower rates of 30-day rehospitalization than before.4 Patients who completed home health services had excellent symptom improvement and functional outcomes.5 Future research could investigate the factors that led to successful home discharge during the pandemic and whether they could be replicated now that it is over.

One limitation of this study is that it occurred at a single urban academic center. Results may not be generalizable to other settings. Other studies have observed a decline in SNF admissions during the first year of the pandemic,6, 7 thus corroborating some of our findings. In addition, more qualitative information would be helpful in determining how decisions on discharge location (SNF vs. home) were made.

Hospital discharges to SNF were the lowest during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and increased over time. Severity of illness decreased throughout the course of the pandemic. Our results pose the question whether, with proper support, more older adults could be discharged to home rather than SNF after hospitalization.

All authors met criteria for authorship by (1) providing substantial intellectual contribution to the study's conception and design (MT, AL, JW, LAL, VRZ.), data acquisition (MT, CO, LAL), data analysis (MT, CO, LAL), and interpretation (all authors); drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content (all authors); and approving the final version to be published (all authors).

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The sponsor was not involved in the design, methods, analysis and interpretation of the data, and preparation of the manuscript.

This research is supported through grants from the NIH/NIA R01AG058777, R01AG068421, R01AG083034, and P30AG059988.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我需要去专业护理机构吗?在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后出院到专业护理机构。
需要康复或持续医疗护理的住院患者通常会出院到专业护理机构(SNF)继续治疗。在COVID-19大流行的最初几年,负担过重的医院非常紧张,因此医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)放弃了获得SNF护理的3天规则,从2020年3月1日起生效。患者不再需要满足住院标准或住院3天即可转移到SNF。我们试图描述在COVID-19大流行豁免期间因SNF出院的趋势。作为城市学术医疗中心SNF出院指标的一部分,利用使用医院住院服务的医疗保险受益人的回顾性队列创建了一个数据库,特别检查了那些出院到SNF接受额外治疗的患者。选择变量(年龄、并发抑郁症诊断、住院时间和ICU入院)来衡量疾病的严重程度。进行二次数据分析,将信息解析为3年:2020年3月至2021年2月(COVID - 1年),2021年3月至2022年2月(2年)和2022年3月至2023年2月(3年),并使用单变量和卡方分析进行分析。我们研究了607个人中674例因SNF而出院的病例(图1)。大约11% (n = 73)的出院病例发生在第一年,24% (n = 164)发生在第二年,65% (n = 437)发生在第三年。第1年和第2年的平均住院时间为12.0天,第3年为10.1天(p &lt; 0.05)。在第一年,没有一个人在被释放到SNF之前被关押少于3天。大约41%的SNF出院前在第1年住过ICU,而第2年和第3年分别为20%和19%,这表明在COVID年之间住过ICU的比例显著下降(p &lt; 0.0001)。1-3年的平均出院年龄从Y1的84.84岁下降到Y2的84.29岁,再到y3的83.54岁。2年级和3年级之间的年龄下降,从2年级的84岁到3年级的79岁是显著的(p &lt; 0.001)。在SNF出院的患者中,诊断为抑郁症的比例在不同年份之间显著减少:第一年为26%,第二年为12%,第三年为16% (p &lt; 0.03)。这项研究是第一个在COVID-19大流行的三年过程中检查医院因SNF出院的研究。在流感大流行的第一年,因SNF住院的出院率最低,而当时病情的严重程度最高。缺乏疫苗和设施访客限制可能促使患者及其家属选择出院回家,而不是SNF。截至2020年底,长期护理机构的居民占美国COVID-19死亡人数的37.7%,当时疫苗首次上市。大流行期间对访客的限制与患者及其家属的情绪困扰增加有关这些变量可以解释为什么snf的入院率相对较低,尽管病情严重。随着大流行的消退和COVID-19由于疫苗接种的出现而不那么致命,SNF的出院人数增加,而疾病的严重程度下降。患者住院时间较短,ICU住院时间较短。抑郁症患者的平均年龄和比例也有所下降。放弃CMS的3天规则可以部分解释这一发现。以前住院观察的患者不符合SNF入院的条件。豁免取消了这一进入壁垒。这些发现表明,也许更多的老年患者可以回家,而不是转移到SNF。在大流行期间,接受家庭保健服务出院的住院老年人的30天再住院率低于以前完成家庭保健服务的患者有良好的症状改善和功能结果未来的研究可以调查在大流行期间导致成功出院的因素,以及在大流行结束后是否可以复制这些因素。这项研究的一个局限性是它发生在一个单一的城市学术中心。结果可能无法推广到其他设置。其他研究发现,在大流行的第一年,SNF入院人数有所下降,从而证实了我们的一些发现。此外,更多的定性信息将有助于确定如何决定放电地点(SNF与家庭)。在COVID-19大流行的第一年,SNF的出院率最低,并且随着时间的推移而增加。在大流行的整个过程中,疾病的严重程度有所下降。我们的研究结果提出了一个问题,在适当的支持下,更多的老年人住院后是否可以出院回家,而不是SNF。所有作者符合作者标准:(1)对研究的概念和设计做出了实质性的智力贡献(MT, AL, JW, LAL, VRZ)。 ),数据采集(MT, CO, LAL),数据分析(MT, CO, LAL)和解释(所有作者);起草文章或对重要知识内容进行批判性修改(所有作者);并批准最终版本的出版(所有作者)。作者声明无利益冲突。主办方没有参与数据的设计、方法、分析和解释,也没有参与稿件的准备。本研究由NIH/NIA R01AG058777, R01AG068421, R01AG083034和P30AG059988资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
期刊最新文献
NOTICES Issue Information Cover NOTICES Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1