Early life exercise impacts physiology and lifespan in a sex- and genotype-dependent manner in a Drosophila melanogaster exercise model

Heidi M. Johnson, Nicole C. Riddle
{"title":"Early life exercise impacts physiology and lifespan in a sex- and genotype-dependent manner in a Drosophila melanogaster exercise model","authors":"Heidi M. Johnson,&nbsp;Nicole C. Riddle","doi":"10.1016/j.exger.2024.112630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Exercise is a common strategy for disease prevention or management, including for diabetes and cardiac dysfunction. However, exercise response varies immensely between individuals, and in humans, the same exercise treatment can lead both to positive and negative responses. <em>Drosophila melanogaster</em> is an established model for exercise research that can be leveraged to understand this variation in exercise response. Here, we investigated how two early life exercise treatments differing in duration (5 and 20 days) impact the animals' health- and lifespan in four genotypes. Specifically, we measured lifespan, activity level, body condition, physical ability, and reproductive output in this exploratory study to gain insights into potential trade-offs. For most measures, we found both immediate and long-term effects, with some effects persisting weeks past the cessation of exercise. The effect of the exercise treatment was context-dependent, with treatment, sex, and genotype interactions determining phenotypes. For example, the 20-day treatment did not exhibit a consistently larger effect than the 5-day treatment. Similarly, neither the 5-day nor the 20-day treatment impacted lifespan, but two specific genotype/sex combinations showed altered lifespan after exercise. The 20-day treatment decreased climbing performance compared to controls up to several weeks after treatment ended in some genotypes. Together, our results highlight the complex, interacting factors controlling exercise response and demonstrate that early life exercise can have long-lasting effects in the Drosophila exercise model even though most individual groups show no response.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94003,"journal":{"name":"Experimental gerontology","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 112630"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556524002766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exercise is a common strategy for disease prevention or management, including for diabetes and cardiac dysfunction. However, exercise response varies immensely between individuals, and in humans, the same exercise treatment can lead both to positive and negative responses. Drosophila melanogaster is an established model for exercise research that can be leveraged to understand this variation in exercise response. Here, we investigated how two early life exercise treatments differing in duration (5 and 20 days) impact the animals' health- and lifespan in four genotypes. Specifically, we measured lifespan, activity level, body condition, physical ability, and reproductive output in this exploratory study to gain insights into potential trade-offs. For most measures, we found both immediate and long-term effects, with some effects persisting weeks past the cessation of exercise. The effect of the exercise treatment was context-dependent, with treatment, sex, and genotype interactions determining phenotypes. For example, the 20-day treatment did not exhibit a consistently larger effect than the 5-day treatment. Similarly, neither the 5-day nor the 20-day treatment impacted lifespan, but two specific genotype/sex combinations showed altered lifespan after exercise. The 20-day treatment decreased climbing performance compared to controls up to several weeks after treatment ended in some genotypes. Together, our results highlight the complex, interacting factors controlling exercise response and demonstrate that early life exercise can have long-lasting effects in the Drosophila exercise model even though most individual groups show no response.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在黑腹果蝇运动模型中,生命早期运动以性别和基因型依赖的方式影响生理机能和寿命。
运动是预防或控制疾病(包括糖尿病和心脏功能障碍)的常用策略。然而,不同个体对运动的反应差异巨大,在人类中,同样的运动治疗既可能导致积极反应,也可能导致消极反应。黑腹果蝇是一种成熟的运动研究模型,可用于了解运动反应的这种差异。在这里,我们研究了两种不同持续时间(5 天和 20 天)的早期运动处理如何影响四种基因型动物的健康和寿命。具体来说,我们在这项探索性研究中测量了动物的寿命、活动水平、身体状况、体能和繁殖能力,以深入了解潜在的权衡问题。对于大多数测量指标,我们都发现了即时和长期的效果,有些效果在停止运动数周后仍然存在。运动疗法的效果取决于具体情况,疗法、性别和基因型的相互作用决定了表型。例如,20 天的治疗效果并不比 5 天的治疗效果大。同样,5 天或 20 天的处理都不会影响寿命,但在两个特定的基因型/性别组合中,运动后寿命会发生改变。与对照组相比,20 天处理会降低某些基因型的攀爬能力,直到处理结束后的几周。总之,我们的研究结果凸显了控制运动反应的复杂、相互作用的因素,并证明在果蝇运动模型中,即使大多数个体组没有表现出反应,生命早期的运动也会产生持久的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental gerontology
Experimental gerontology Ageing, Biochemistry, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Lower extremity muscle hypertrophy in response to resistance training in older adults: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials Effects of precision health management combined with dual-energy bone densitometer treatment on bone biomarkers in senile osteoporosis patients Sex differences in mortality risk and U-shaped relationship with klotho levels: A long-term cohort study Immediate effects of structured and natural deep breathing on heart rate variability and blood pressure in community-dwelling older adults Sex-specific poor physical performance in Korean community-dwelling older adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1