Modelling, simulation, thermodynamic and economic performance analysis of steam and CO2 as diluents in thermal cracking furnace for ethylene manufacturing

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Fuel Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133656
Yao Zhang , Hui Yan , Daotong Chong , Cailing Guo , Shengyuan Huang , Joan Cordiner , Meihong Wang
{"title":"Modelling, simulation, thermodynamic and economic performance analysis of steam and CO2 as diluents in thermal cracking furnace for ethylene manufacturing","authors":"Yao Zhang ,&nbsp;Hui Yan ,&nbsp;Daotong Chong ,&nbsp;Cailing Guo ,&nbsp;Shengyuan Huang ,&nbsp;Joan Cordiner ,&nbsp;Meihong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy consumption, economic and environmental benefits of thermal cracking furnace have been important topics in ethylene manufacturing. Use of captured CO<sub>2</sub> as alternative diluent in thermal cracking furnace can significantly contribute to CO<sub>2</sub> reduction while the studies on CO<sub>2</sub> as diluent are limited and inaccurate. To carry out comparative analysis of using steam and CO<sub>2</sub> as diluents in propane cracking for ethylene manufacturing, a 1-dimensional (1-D) pseudo-dynamic model of plug flow reactor (PFR) was developed and implemented in gPROMS ModelBuilder®. The model was validated and showed good agreement with industrial data from literature and then was used to analyse the economic and thermodynamic performance of PFR using different diluents. The process analysis includes: (1) impact of diluent-to-propane ratio using steam as diluent; (2) impact of diluent-to-propane ratio using CO<sub>2</sub> and compared with using steam; (3) comparison of pure/mixed diluents in 4 different scenarios. The results indicated that the PFR could reach highest annual production at the steam-to-propane ratio 0.2 and reach highest annual profit at the ratio 0.3 when using steam as diluent. Compared with steam, using CO<sub>2</sub> as diluent hardly changes the annual production, but can significantly increase the run length and the annual profit. The highest annual profit using CO<sub>2</sub> is 10.10 % higher than that using steam and when operating at the diluent-to-propane ratio achieving highest annual profit, using CO<sub>2</sub> as diluent can save 17.44 % energy and reduce the exergy destruction by 20.53 %. Pure CO<sub>2</sub> was recommended as diluent from comparison of pure/mixed diluents in 4 different scenarios. The key findings of this paper provide significant operational guidance for existing thermal cracking furnace using steam as diluent and also provide insights for future new generation diluents design to reduce the energy consumption in quantity and quality and increase the economic benefits of thermal cracking furnace for ethylene manufacturing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":325,"journal":{"name":"Fuel","volume":"381 ","pages":"Article 133656"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236124028059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy consumption, economic and environmental benefits of thermal cracking furnace have been important topics in ethylene manufacturing. Use of captured CO2 as alternative diluent in thermal cracking furnace can significantly contribute to CO2 reduction while the studies on CO2 as diluent are limited and inaccurate. To carry out comparative analysis of using steam and CO2 as diluents in propane cracking for ethylene manufacturing, a 1-dimensional (1-D) pseudo-dynamic model of plug flow reactor (PFR) was developed and implemented in gPROMS ModelBuilder®. The model was validated and showed good agreement with industrial data from literature and then was used to analyse the economic and thermodynamic performance of PFR using different diluents. The process analysis includes: (1) impact of diluent-to-propane ratio using steam as diluent; (2) impact of diluent-to-propane ratio using CO2 and compared with using steam; (3) comparison of pure/mixed diluents in 4 different scenarios. The results indicated that the PFR could reach highest annual production at the steam-to-propane ratio 0.2 and reach highest annual profit at the ratio 0.3 when using steam as diluent. Compared with steam, using CO2 as diluent hardly changes the annual production, but can significantly increase the run length and the annual profit. The highest annual profit using CO2 is 10.10 % higher than that using steam and when operating at the diluent-to-propane ratio achieving highest annual profit, using CO2 as diluent can save 17.44 % energy and reduce the exergy destruction by 20.53 %. Pure CO2 was recommended as diluent from comparison of pure/mixed diluents in 4 different scenarios. The key findings of this paper provide significant operational guidance for existing thermal cracking furnace using steam as diluent and also provide insights for future new generation diluents design to reduce the energy consumption in quantity and quality and increase the economic benefits of thermal cracking furnace for ethylene manufacturing.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乙烯生产热裂解炉中作为稀释剂的蒸汽和二氧化碳的建模、模拟、热力学和经济性能分析
热裂解炉的能耗、经济和环境效益一直是乙烯生产的重要课题。在热裂解炉中使用捕集的二氧化碳作为替代稀释剂可大大有助于减少二氧化碳的排放,而有关二氧化碳作为稀释剂的研究却非常有限且不准确。为了对丙烷裂解制乙烯过程中使用蒸汽和二氧化碳作为稀释剂进行比较分析,开发了一个塞流反应器(PFR)的一维(1-D)伪动态模型,并在 gPROMS ModelBuilder® 中实施。该模型经过验证,与文献中的工业数据非常吻合,随后被用于分析使用不同稀释剂的 PFR 的经济和热力学性能。工艺分析包括(1) 使用蒸汽作为稀释剂时稀释剂与丙烷比率的影响;(2) 使用二氧化碳作为稀释剂时稀释剂与丙烷比率的影响,并与使用蒸汽进行比较;(3) 在 4 种不同情况下纯稀释剂/混合稀释剂的比较。结果表明,当使用蒸汽作为稀释剂时,当蒸汽与丙烷的比例为 0.2 时,PFR 的年产量最高;当蒸汽与丙烷的比例为 0.3 时,PFR 的年利润最高。与蒸汽相比,使用二氧化碳作为稀释剂几乎不会改变年产量,但会显著增加运行时间和年利润。使用二氧化碳的最高年利润比使用蒸汽的高 10.10%,在稀丙烷比达到最高年利润时,使用二氧化碳作为稀释剂可节能 17.44%,减少 20.53%的放能破坏。通过对 4 种不同情况下的纯稀释剂/混合稀释剂进行比较,推荐使用纯二氧化碳作为稀释剂。本文的主要结论为现有使用蒸汽作为稀释剂的热裂解炉提供了重要的操作指导,同时也为未来新一代稀释剂的设计提供了启示,从而在数量和质量上降低能耗,提高乙烯生产热裂解炉的经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fuel
Fuel 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
20.30%
发文量
3506
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The exploration of energy sources remains a critical matter of study. For the past nine decades, fuel has consistently held the forefront in primary research efforts within the field of energy science. This area of investigation encompasses a wide range of subjects, with a particular emphasis on emerging concerns like environmental factors and pollution.
期刊最新文献
Highly efficient Zr-based coordination polymer for catalytic transfer hydrogenation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural: Tuning acid strength and enhancing stability Engineering noble metal-free nickel catalysts for highly efficient liquid fuel production from waste polyolefins under mild conditions A functional fluorine (F)-containing oxidiser of nano-networked NH4CuF3 to improve the combustion efficiency of Al powder Gold nanocatalysts supported on Mono-/Mixed oxides for efficient synthesis of methyl methacrylate Enhancing photocatalytic H2 evolution of Cd0.5Zn0.5S with the synergism of amorphous CoS cocatalysts and surface S2− adsorption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1