Evaluation of 100% alternative fuel combustion under oxyfuel conditions in a pilot-scale burner for application in retrofit oxyfuel cement kiln

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Fuel Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133697
Cynthia Kroumian , Joerg Maier , Konstantina Peloriadi , Günter Scheffknecht , Panagiotis Grammelis
{"title":"Evaluation of 100% alternative fuel combustion under oxyfuel conditions in a pilot-scale burner for application in retrofit oxyfuel cement kiln","authors":"Cynthia Kroumian ,&nbsp;Joerg Maier ,&nbsp;Konstantina Peloriadi ,&nbsp;Günter Scheffknecht ,&nbsp;Panagiotis Grammelis","doi":"10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The cement industry is one of the largest industrial CO<sub>2</sub> emitters, where CO<sub>2</sub> is emitted from combustion and clinker production processes. This study focuses on substituting fossil fuels with alternative fuels under oxyfuel conditions to advance the technical feasibility of carbon capture technology. Combustion tests are performed in a 300 <!--> <!-->kW pilot-scale facility, where the burner has been optimized to replicate a retrofit oxyfuel cement kiln burner. Coal combustion in air is the reference case for the tests. The alternative fuels used in the tests are solid recovered fuel (SRF), wood and co-combustion of 90 %<sub>th</sub> wood − 10 %<sub>th</sub> sludge. Combustion scenarios are studied under both air and oxyfuel conditions with two different flue gas recirculation ratios (RR). Axial measurements of the flame temperature, heat flux and concentrations of gases are measured and evaluated. The burner and combustion chamber are modeled with CFD simulations. The boundary conditions of the SRF combustion in both air and oxyfuel conditions are modeled and the results are validated with the corresponding experimental data. The O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration during combustion of alternative fuels under oxyfuel conditions, measured 300 <!--> <!-->cm from the burner, are on average 3 ± 2 vol-% and 82 ± 5 vol-%, respectively. The average heat flux for the alternative fuels, 33 <!--> <!-->cm from the burner, is 122 ± 15 <!--> <!-->kW/m<sup>2</sup> and increases to form a plateau between 100 and 200 <!--> <!-->cm from the burner at 177 ± 16 <!--> <!-->kW/m<sup>2</sup>. Compared to coal, the used alternative fuels are milled to a larger particle size, have on average 3.3 times higher volatile matter content, have faster devolatilization rates and have a longer flame shape. The oxyfuel case with higher RR resembles the air case in terms of the temperature profile, heat flux profile and inlet gas momentum. The combustion of alternative fuels is stable in both air and oxyfuel conditions and the flames compared to coal are wider, longer and less intense. CFD simulations of the prototype burner are conducted and validated against experimental data for 100 % SRF combustion. The model offers useful insight into the combustion of SRF fuel, it is particularly accurate for conventional air operating conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":325,"journal":{"name":"Fuel","volume":"381 ","pages":"Article 133697"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236124028461","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cement industry is one of the largest industrial CO2 emitters, where CO2 is emitted from combustion and clinker production processes. This study focuses on substituting fossil fuels with alternative fuels under oxyfuel conditions to advance the technical feasibility of carbon capture technology. Combustion tests are performed in a 300  kW pilot-scale facility, where the burner has been optimized to replicate a retrofit oxyfuel cement kiln burner. Coal combustion in air is the reference case for the tests. The alternative fuels used in the tests are solid recovered fuel (SRF), wood and co-combustion of 90 %th wood − 10 %th sludge. Combustion scenarios are studied under both air and oxyfuel conditions with two different flue gas recirculation ratios (RR). Axial measurements of the flame temperature, heat flux and concentrations of gases are measured and evaluated. The burner and combustion chamber are modeled with CFD simulations. The boundary conditions of the SRF combustion in both air and oxyfuel conditions are modeled and the results are validated with the corresponding experimental data. The O2 and CO2 concentration during combustion of alternative fuels under oxyfuel conditions, measured 300  cm from the burner, are on average 3 ± 2 vol-% and 82 ± 5 vol-%, respectively. The average heat flux for the alternative fuels, 33  cm from the burner, is 122 ± 15  kW/m2 and increases to form a plateau between 100 and 200  cm from the burner at 177 ± 16  kW/m2. Compared to coal, the used alternative fuels are milled to a larger particle size, have on average 3.3 times higher volatile matter content, have faster devolatilization rates and have a longer flame shape. The oxyfuel case with higher RR resembles the air case in terms of the temperature profile, heat flux profile and inlet gas momentum. The combustion of alternative fuels is stable in both air and oxyfuel conditions and the flames compared to coal are wider, longer and less intense. CFD simulations of the prototype burner are conducted and validated against experimental data for 100 % SRF combustion. The model offers useful insight into the combustion of SRF fuel, it is particularly accurate for conventional air operating conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估全氧燃烧条件下 100%替代燃料在中试规模燃烧器中的燃烧情况,以应用于全氧燃烧水泥窑改造
水泥行业是最大的工业二氧化碳排放源之一,二氧化碳主要来自燃烧和熟料生产过程。本研究的重点是在全氧燃烧条件下用替代燃料替代化石燃料,以推进碳捕集技术的技术可行性。燃烧测试在一个 300 千瓦的中试规模设施中进行,该设施的燃烧器已经过优化,可以复制改造后的全氧燃烧水泥窑燃烧器。煤在空气中的燃烧是测试的参考情况。试验中使用的替代燃料有固体回收燃料(SRF)、木材和 90% 的木材与 10% 的污泥混合燃烧。在空气和全氧燃烧条件下,采用两种不同的烟气再循环比 (RR) 对燃烧情况进行了研究。对火焰温度、热流量和气体浓度进行了轴向测量和评估。燃烧器和燃烧室采用 CFD 模拟建模。模拟了 SRF 在空气和全氧燃烧条件下燃烧的边界条件,并将结果与相应的实验数据进行了验证。在全氧燃烧条件下,替代燃料燃烧时的 O2 和 CO2 浓度在距离燃烧器 300 厘米处测得,平均值分别为 3 ± 2 vol-% 和 82 ± 5 vol-%。在距离燃烧器 33 厘米处,替代燃料的平均热通量为 122 ± 15 kW/m2,并在距离燃烧器 100 至 200 厘米处上升至 177 ± 16 kW/m2 的高点。与煤炭相比,所使用的替代燃料的粒度更大,挥发物含量平均高出 3.3 倍,分解速度更快,火焰形状更长。就温度曲线、热通量曲线和入口气体动量而言,RR 较高的纯氧燃料情况与空气情况相似。替代燃料在空气和全氧燃烧条件下的燃烧都很稳定,与煤炭相比,火焰更宽、更长、强度更低。对原型燃烧器进行了 CFD 模拟,并根据 100% SRF 燃烧的实验数据进行了验证。该模型为 SRF 燃料的燃烧提供了有用的见解,尤其是在常规空气操作条件下的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fuel
Fuel 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
20.30%
发文量
3506
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The exploration of energy sources remains a critical matter of study. For the past nine decades, fuel has consistently held the forefront in primary research efforts within the field of energy science. This area of investigation encompasses a wide range of subjects, with a particular emphasis on emerging concerns like environmental factors and pollution.
期刊最新文献
Highly efficient Zr-based coordination polymer for catalytic transfer hydrogenation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural: Tuning acid strength and enhancing stability Engineering noble metal-free nickel catalysts for highly efficient liquid fuel production from waste polyolefins under mild conditions A functional fluorine (F)-containing oxidiser of nano-networked NH4CuF3 to improve the combustion efficiency of Al powder Gold nanocatalysts supported on Mono-/Mixed oxides for efficient synthesis of methyl methacrylate Enhancing photocatalytic H2 evolution of Cd0.5Zn0.5S with the synergism of amorphous CoS cocatalysts and surface S2− adsorption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1