Dheerej H. Sathish Kumar , Hugo K.H. Olierook , Milo Barham , Christopher L. Kirkland , Kai Rankenburg , Noreen J. Evans
{"title":"Provenance and tectonic intricacies revealed by in situ Rb-Sr dating of detrital micas","authors":"Dheerej H. Sathish Kumar , Hugo K.H. Olierook , Milo Barham , Christopher L. Kirkland , Kai Rankenburg , Noreen J. Evans","doi":"10.1016/j.chemgeo.2024.122482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of detrital minerals to reconstruct sedimentary provenance is subject to a range of biases, which may reduce the value of the geological information they retain. With the advent of in situ Rb-Sr geochronology, rapid analyses of a representative (>100) number of grains can now be performed on radiogenic Sr-bearing minerals to provide more comprehensive knowledge of source-to-sink processes through more diversified mineral analysis. Here, we test the in situ Rb-Sr technique on detrital white mica and biotite from basin margin and axis samples in a simple rift basin (Perth Basin, Australia) for which previously published detrital zircon U-Pb and Hf isotopic data exist. For the basin margin adjacent to Archean basement, which has unimodal detrital zircon ages at c. 2600 Ma, two mica samples reveal a dominant age mode at c. 500 Ma, reflecting thermal resetting in the craton proximal to the Gondwanan orogenic front, and a subordinate portion of Archean mica detritus that can be interpreted as having been distally sourced (>100 km away). Similarly, a basin axis sample yielded minor c. 1200 Ma apparent mica ages, representing distal sources from the Albany-Fraser-Wilkes Orogen, and c. 500 Ma grains that are likely a resetting product. Whilst obscured in the detrital zircon record, mica samples allow quantification of the relative contributions of distal and proximal sources to the basin. Finally, detrital biotite that was (partially) altered to chlorite yielded partially to fully reset ages between c. 500 and 130 Ma, the latter linked to heating from the c. 137–130 Ma Bunbury Basalt. Ultimately, the use of in situ Rb-Sr geochronology from detrital micas reveal previously unrecognized provenance and tectonic information that is critical to understanding the true complexity of ancient geological histories, but which remains obscured in standard detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9847,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Geology","volume":"671 ","pages":"Article 122482"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000925412400562X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of detrital minerals to reconstruct sedimentary provenance is subject to a range of biases, which may reduce the value of the geological information they retain. With the advent of in situ Rb-Sr geochronology, rapid analyses of a representative (>100) number of grains can now be performed on radiogenic Sr-bearing minerals to provide more comprehensive knowledge of source-to-sink processes through more diversified mineral analysis. Here, we test the in situ Rb-Sr technique on detrital white mica and biotite from basin margin and axis samples in a simple rift basin (Perth Basin, Australia) for which previously published detrital zircon U-Pb and Hf isotopic data exist. For the basin margin adjacent to Archean basement, which has unimodal detrital zircon ages at c. 2600 Ma, two mica samples reveal a dominant age mode at c. 500 Ma, reflecting thermal resetting in the craton proximal to the Gondwanan orogenic front, and a subordinate portion of Archean mica detritus that can be interpreted as having been distally sourced (>100 km away). Similarly, a basin axis sample yielded minor c. 1200 Ma apparent mica ages, representing distal sources from the Albany-Fraser-Wilkes Orogen, and c. 500 Ma grains that are likely a resetting product. Whilst obscured in the detrital zircon record, mica samples allow quantification of the relative contributions of distal and proximal sources to the basin. Finally, detrital biotite that was (partially) altered to chlorite yielded partially to fully reset ages between c. 500 and 130 Ma, the latter linked to heating from the c. 137–130 Ma Bunbury Basalt. Ultimately, the use of in situ Rb-Sr geochronology from detrital micas reveal previously unrecognized provenance and tectonic information that is critical to understanding the true complexity of ancient geological histories, but which remains obscured in standard detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology.
利用碎屑岩矿物重建沉积产地受到一系列偏差的影响,这可能会降低它们所保留的地质信息的价值。随着原位 Rb-Sr 地质年代学的出现,现在可以对具有代表性(100 个)的含放射性 Sr 的矿物颗粒进行快速分析,通过更多样化的矿物分析,更全面地了解从源到汇的过程。在这里,我们对来自一个简单裂谷盆地(澳大利亚珀斯盆地)的盆地边缘和轴线样本中的碎屑白云母和生物云母进行了原位Rb-Sr技术测试,之前已经公布了这些样本的碎屑锆石U-Pb和Hf同位素数据。对于邻近阿切安基底的盆地边缘,其锆英石碎片的单模式年龄约为 2600 Ma,两个云母样品显示了约 500 Ma 的主要年龄模式,反映了冈瓦纳造山带前沿附近克拉通的热重置,以及可解释为远源(100 公里以外)的阿切安云母碎屑的次要部分。同样,在一个盆地轴样本中也发现了约 1200 Ma 的表观云母年龄,代表了阿尔巴尼-弗雷泽-威尔克斯造山带的远端来源,以及约 500 Ma 的颗粒,很可能是重置产物。云母样品虽然在锆英石记录中被遮挡,但可以量化远源和近源对盆地的相对贡献。最后,被(部分)改变为绿泥石的非晶质生物岩产生了约 500 至 130 Ma 之间的部分至完全重置年龄,后者与约 137-130 Ma 邦伯里玄武岩的加热有关。最终,利用原位掺杂铷-锶的云母地质年代学揭示了以前未认识到的产地和构造信息,这些信息对于了解古代地质历史的真正复杂性至关重要,但在标准的云母锆石U-Pb地质年代学中却被掩盖了。
期刊介绍:
Chemical Geology is an international journal that publishes original research papers on isotopic and elemental geochemistry, geochronology and cosmochemistry.
The Journal focuses on chemical processes in igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary petrology, low- and high-temperature aqueous solutions, biogeochemistry, the environment and cosmochemistry.
Papers that are field, experimentally, or computationally based are appropriate if they are of broad international interest. The Journal generally does not publish papers that are primarily of regional or local interest, or which are primarily focused on remediation and applied geochemistry.
The Journal also welcomes innovative papers dealing with significant analytical advances that are of wide interest in the community and extend significantly beyond the scope of what would be included in the methods section of a standard research paper.