Efficacy of Jatropha curcas extracts amended with sulphur against Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus ear rot on maize at harvest

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Crop Protection Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.cropro.2024.107017
D.T. Manyama , R.R. Madege , S.M.S. Massomo
{"title":"Efficacy of Jatropha curcas extracts amended with sulphur against Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus ear rot on maize at harvest","authors":"D.T. Manyama ,&nbsp;R.R. Madege ,&nbsp;S.M.S. Massomo","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2024.107017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Jatropha curcas</em> (Euphorbiaceae) is often considered a “miracle plant” due to its multiple uses, including its extracts reported insecticidal and fungicidal effects. This study assessed the efficacy of aqueous extract from dried leaves of <em>J. curcas</em> and Sulphur 99.5% WP fungicide in managing <em>Aspergillus flavus</em> growth and <em>Aspergillus</em> ear rot (AER) in maize at harvest across two sites. Treatments included botanical extracts at 300 g/L (T1), 350 g/L (T2), Sulphur at 5 g/L (T3) and 10 g/L (T4), and combinations of botanical extracts with Sulphur at both low and high concentrations (T5 and T6). Additionally, Aflasafe TZ01™ and untreated control were used as checks. At site 1, T2 and T6 significantly reduced AER incidence (10% and 13.33%, respectively) compared to the untreated control (70%). At site 2, most treatments, particularly the combinations of botanicals and sulphur, had lower AER incidences than the control. All treatments significantly reduced AER severity at site 1, where the untreated control exhibited the highest severity (67%). A similar trend was observed at site 2, although Aflasafe showed severity levels comparable to the control. Significant differences in <em>A. flavus</em> population counts were observed among treatments at both sites, with higher dosages of botanical extracts and their combinations with sulphur showing lower counts than the untreated control. The counts, in Colony Forming Units per gram (CFU/g), ranged from 171.5 (T6) to 490.9 (untreated control) and 80.5 (T6) to 554.4 (untreated control) in sites 1 and 2, respectively. These findings indicate that <em>Jatropha curcas</em>, either alone or in combination with sulphur, hold potential as a component of integrated management strategies against <em>Aspergillus flavus</em> infections at the pre-harvest stage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 107017"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219424004459","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jatropha curcas (Euphorbiaceae) is often considered a “miracle plant” due to its multiple uses, including its extracts reported insecticidal and fungicidal effects. This study assessed the efficacy of aqueous extract from dried leaves of J. curcas and Sulphur 99.5% WP fungicide in managing Aspergillus flavus growth and Aspergillus ear rot (AER) in maize at harvest across two sites. Treatments included botanical extracts at 300 g/L (T1), 350 g/L (T2), Sulphur at 5 g/L (T3) and 10 g/L (T4), and combinations of botanical extracts with Sulphur at both low and high concentrations (T5 and T6). Additionally, Aflasafe TZ01™ and untreated control were used as checks. At site 1, T2 and T6 significantly reduced AER incidence (10% and 13.33%, respectively) compared to the untreated control (70%). At site 2, most treatments, particularly the combinations of botanicals and sulphur, had lower AER incidences than the control. All treatments significantly reduced AER severity at site 1, where the untreated control exhibited the highest severity (67%). A similar trend was observed at site 2, although Aflasafe showed severity levels comparable to the control. Significant differences in A. flavus population counts were observed among treatments at both sites, with higher dosages of botanical extracts and their combinations with sulphur showing lower counts than the untreated control. The counts, in Colony Forming Units per gram (CFU/g), ranged from 171.5 (T6) to 490.9 (untreated control) and 80.5 (T6) to 554.4 (untreated control) in sites 1 and 2, respectively. These findings indicate that Jatropha curcas, either alone or in combination with sulphur, hold potential as a component of integrated management strategies against Aspergillus flavus infections at the pre-harvest stage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用硫磺添加麻疯树提取物防治玉米收获期黄曲霉和穗腐曲霉的功效
麻疯树(大戟科)因其多种用途,包括据报道具有杀虫和杀真菌作用的提取物,常被视为 "神奇植物"。本研究评估了从麻风树干叶中提取的水提取物和硫磺 99.5% WP 杀菌剂对两个地点玉米收获时黄曲霉生长和曲霉穗腐病(AER)的防治效果。处理包括 300 克/升(T1)、350 克/升(T2)的植物提取物,5 克/升(T3)和 10 克/升(T4)的硫磺,以及低浓度和高浓度植物提取物与硫磺的组合(T5 和 T6)。此外,还使用 Aflasafe TZ01™ 和未处理的对照作为对照。与未处理的对照组(70%)相比,在种植点 1,T2 和 T6 显著降低了赤霉病发生率(分别为 10%和 13.33%)。在 2 号试验点,大多数处理,特别是植物药和硫磺的组合,都比对照组的 AER 发生率低。所有处理都明显降低了 1 号地的 AER 严重程度,其中未处理对照的 AER 严重程度最高(67%)。在 2 号点也观察到类似的趋势,尽管 Aflasafe 的严重程度与对照相当。在这两个地点,不同处理的黄曲霉种群数量存在显著差异,植物提取物及其与硫磺的复配剂量越高,黄曲霉种群数量越低于未处理的对照。以每克菌落形成单位(CFU/g)计,1 号地点和 2 号地点的菌落计数范围分别为 171.5(T6)至 490.9(未处理对照)和 80.5(T6)至 554.4(未处理对照)。这些研究结果表明,麻风树单独或与硫磺结合使用,都有可能成为在收获前阶段防治黄曲霉感染的综合管理策略的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Crop Protection
Crop Protection 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics: -Abiotic damage- Agronomic control methods- Assessment of pest and disease damage- Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases- Biological control- Biorational pesticides- Control of animal pests of world crops- Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms- Control of weeds and integrated management- Economic considerations- Effects of plant growth regulators- Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use- Environmental effects of pesticides- Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control- GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications- Importance and control of postharvest crop losses- Integrated control- Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies- Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection- Pesticide application methods- Pest management- Phytobiomes for pest and disease control- Resistance management- Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.
期刊最新文献
Development and effectivity of Solanum sisymbriifolium against potato cyst nematode under field conditions in soils from the southern atlantic area Resistance risk assessment and fitness cost of cyproflanilide in the common cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Analyzing the performance of deep convolutional neural network models for weed identification in potato fields Colletotrichum species associated with durian (Durio zibethinus Murray) in Hainan, China Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1