Pratibha Sharma , Sean P. Murphy , Julie R. Kikkert , Sarah J. Pethybridge
{"title":"Evaluation of foliar fungicides for Cercospora leaf spot management in table beet in New York","authors":"Pratibha Sharma , Sean P. Murphy , Julie R. Kikkert , Sarah J. Pethybridge","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2024.107028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cercospora leaf spot (CLS), caused by the fungus, <em>Cercospora beticola,</em> is a major constraint to table beet production in New York (NY). The disease causes defoliation, negatively impacting harvests using top-pulling machinery and rendering plants unsuitable for fresh market sales. High genetic diversity within <em>C. beticola</em> populations can result in the rapid development of resistance to single-site mode of action fungicides. Therefore, products with multiple modes of action and/or differential site-specific modes of action are highly desirable to improve the resiliency of CLS management. In 2021 and 2022, small plot replicated trials were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of selected fungicides for CLS management in table beet at Geneva, NY. Propiconazole, pydiflumetofen + fludioxonil, and copper hydroxide were the most efficacious for CLS management and not significantly different between each other. Across these treatments, CLS severity was reduced by 72.8% and 78.6% compared to nontreated plots in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Trifloxystrobin + fluopyram, pyrimethanil + fluopyram and pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxad provided moderate disease control with an average reduction of 45.4% and 56.7% in CLS severity in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Trifloxystrobin and a proprietary copper + zinc (Cu/Zn) compound at two rates (0.25% and 0.5% v/v) also significantly reduced CLS severity by 20.1% in 2021 but not in 2022. Improvements in foliar health through reduced CLS severity had no significant effect on root shape, size, color, and sugar content. This information underpins best management practices for foliar health leading to economic and sustainable outcomes for table beet producers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 107028"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219424004563","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cercospora leaf spot (CLS), caused by the fungus, Cercospora beticola, is a major constraint to table beet production in New York (NY). The disease causes defoliation, negatively impacting harvests using top-pulling machinery and rendering plants unsuitable for fresh market sales. High genetic diversity within C. beticola populations can result in the rapid development of resistance to single-site mode of action fungicides. Therefore, products with multiple modes of action and/or differential site-specific modes of action are highly desirable to improve the resiliency of CLS management. In 2021 and 2022, small plot replicated trials were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of selected fungicides for CLS management in table beet at Geneva, NY. Propiconazole, pydiflumetofen + fludioxonil, and copper hydroxide were the most efficacious for CLS management and not significantly different between each other. Across these treatments, CLS severity was reduced by 72.8% and 78.6% compared to nontreated plots in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Trifloxystrobin + fluopyram, pyrimethanil + fluopyram and pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxad provided moderate disease control with an average reduction of 45.4% and 56.7% in CLS severity in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Trifloxystrobin and a proprietary copper + zinc (Cu/Zn) compound at two rates (0.25% and 0.5% v/v) also significantly reduced CLS severity by 20.1% in 2021 but not in 2022. Improvements in foliar health through reduced CLS severity had no significant effect on root shape, size, color, and sugar content. This information underpins best management practices for foliar health leading to economic and sustainable outcomes for table beet producers.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.