Xian Li , Jun-Long An , Wen-Jing Wang , Tong-Xian Liu , Shi-Ze Zhang
{"title":"Influence of four noctuid pests on preference and offspring fitness of Cotesia ruficrus","authors":"Xian Li , Jun-Long An , Wen-Jing Wang , Tong-Xian Liu , Shi-Ze Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2024.107027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Corn, as a crucial staple food crop, has historically faced significant challenges from a variety of pests, particularly those belonging to Lepidoptera order. The parasitoid <em>Cotesia ruficrus</em> has demonstrated efficacy in controlling certain Lepidoptera pests. This study aimed to elucidate the parasitism preference and fitness outcomes of <em>C. ruficrus</em> across four prominent noctuid pests: <em>Spodoptera frugiperda</em>, <em>Mythinma separata</em>, <em>Helicoverpa armigera</em>, and <em>Spodoptera litura</em>. The results showed that <em>C. ruficrus</em> exhibited a preference for the four herbivore species as follows: <em>M. separata > S. frugiperda/H. armigera > S. litura</em>. While <em>C. ruficrus</em> could successfully complete its life cycle within the bodies of <em>M. separata</em> and <em>S. frugiperda</em>, the same was not feasible with <em>H. armigera</em> and <em>S. litura</em> as hosts. Moreover, the number of offspring produced by <em>C. ruficrus</em> per host was significantly higher when parasitizing <em>M. separata</em> compared to <em>S. frugiperda</em>. However, the mature egg count in the ovaries and adult body size of <em>C. ruficrus</em> were notably smaller when utilizing <em>M. separata</em> as a host. In summary, the study revealed that <em>C. ruficrus</em> displays a preference for parasitizing <em>M. separata</em> among the four herbivores, yielding improved offspring numbers and performance. These findings provide valuable insights for the biological control of the studied pests and contribute to enhancing the propagation techniques of <em>C. ruficrus</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 107027"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219424004551","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Corn, as a crucial staple food crop, has historically faced significant challenges from a variety of pests, particularly those belonging to Lepidoptera order. The parasitoid Cotesia ruficrus has demonstrated efficacy in controlling certain Lepidoptera pests. This study aimed to elucidate the parasitism preference and fitness outcomes of C. ruficrus across four prominent noctuid pests: Spodoptera frugiperda, Mythinma separata, Helicoverpa armigera, and Spodoptera litura. The results showed that C. ruficrus exhibited a preference for the four herbivore species as follows: M. separata > S. frugiperda/H. armigera > S. litura. While C. ruficrus could successfully complete its life cycle within the bodies of M. separata and S. frugiperda, the same was not feasible with H. armigera and S. litura as hosts. Moreover, the number of offspring produced by C. ruficrus per host was significantly higher when parasitizing M. separata compared to S. frugiperda. However, the mature egg count in the ovaries and adult body size of C. ruficrus were notably smaller when utilizing M. separata as a host. In summary, the study revealed that C. ruficrus displays a preference for parasitizing M. separata among the four herbivores, yielding improved offspring numbers and performance. These findings provide valuable insights for the biological control of the studied pests and contribute to enhancing the propagation techniques of C. ruficrus.
玉米作为一种重要的主食作物,历来面临着各种害虫,尤其是鳞翅目害虫的巨大挑战。寄生虫 Cotesia ruficrus 已证明能有效控制某些鳞翅目害虫。本研究旨在阐明 C. ruficrus 对四种主要夜蛾类害虫的寄生偏好和适应性结果:Spodoptera frugiperda、Mythinma separata、Helicoverpa armigera 和 Spodoptera litura。结果表明,C. ruficrus 对以下四种食草动物表现出偏好:M. separata > S. frugiperda/H. armigera > S. litura。虽然 C. ruficrus 可以在 M. separata 和 S. frugiperda 的体内顺利完成其生命周期,但以 H. armigera 和 S. litura 为宿主则无法完成。此外,与 S. frugiperda 相比,C. ruficrus 在寄生 M. separata 时每个寄主产生的后代数量要高得多。然而,在利用 M. separata 作为宿主时,C. ruficrus 的卵巢成熟卵数和成虫体型明显较小。总之,该研究发现,在四种食草动物中,C. ruficrus表现出对寄生于M. separata的偏好,从而提高了后代的数量和表现。这些发现为所研究害虫的生物防治提供了有价值的见解,并有助于提高 C. ruficrus 的繁殖技术。
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.