Trustworthy collaborative evaluation of multi-service subjects in the cloud manufacturing model

IF 6.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY alexandria engineering journal Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.aej.2024.11.021
Tao Yang, Yihuan Ding, Wei Chen
{"title":"Trustworthy collaborative evaluation of multi-service subjects in the cloud manufacturing model","authors":"Tao Yang,&nbsp;Yihuan Ding,&nbsp;Wei Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.aej.2024.11.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of cloud manufacturing, challenges related to trust, including malicious deception and dishonest feedback, are exacerbated by information asymmetry among platform participants. To address these issues, a novel approach for evaluating collaboration credibility among multi-service subjects within the cloud manufacturing framework is introduced. Initially, an evaluation index system is constructed, incorporating both internal and external data from the platform. This system is framed around four critical dimensions: subject characteristics, service characteristics, product characteristics, and task characteristics. The attribute weights are determined using an integrated assignment method. Subsequently, to effectively address the issues of ambiguity, uncertainty and randomness of evaluation information in the integrated evaluation process, this paper proposed a comprehensive evaluation model. This model capitalizes on the strengths of intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) and cloud models in converting qualitative assessments into quantitative evaluations, and leverages the method of approximation of the order of ideal solutions (TOPSIS) to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the degree of trustworthy collaboration of the service subject. The practicality and validity of the proposed methodology are demonstrated through a case study analysis, which confirms the model's effectiveness in enhancing the reliability of collaborative evaluations under the cloud manufacturing model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7484,"journal":{"name":"alexandria engineering journal","volume":"113 ","pages":"Pages 1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"alexandria engineering journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016824014467","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of cloud manufacturing, challenges related to trust, including malicious deception and dishonest feedback, are exacerbated by information asymmetry among platform participants. To address these issues, a novel approach for evaluating collaboration credibility among multi-service subjects within the cloud manufacturing framework is introduced. Initially, an evaluation index system is constructed, incorporating both internal and external data from the platform. This system is framed around four critical dimensions: subject characteristics, service characteristics, product characteristics, and task characteristics. The attribute weights are determined using an integrated assignment method. Subsequently, to effectively address the issues of ambiguity, uncertainty and randomness of evaluation information in the integrated evaluation process, this paper proposed a comprehensive evaluation model. This model capitalizes on the strengths of intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) and cloud models in converting qualitative assessments into quantitative evaluations, and leverages the method of approximation of the order of ideal solutions (TOPSIS) to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the degree of trustworthy collaboration of the service subject. The practicality and validity of the proposed methodology are demonstrated through a case study analysis, which confirms the model's effectiveness in enhancing the reliability of collaborative evaluations under the cloud manufacturing model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
云制造模式中多服务主体的可信协同评估
在云制造背景下,平台参与者之间的信息不对称加剧了与信任相关的挑战,包括恶意欺骗和不诚实反馈。为解决这些问题,本文介绍了一种在云制造框架内评估多服务主体间协作可信度的新方法。首先,结合平台的内部和外部数据,构建了一个评价指标体系。该系统围绕四个关键维度展开:主体特征、服务特征、产品特征和任务特征。属性权重采用综合赋值法确定。随后,为有效解决综合评价过程中评价信息的模糊性、不确定性和随机性等问题,本文提出了一种综合评价模型。该模型利用直觉模糊集(IFS)和云模型将定性评价转化为定量评价的优势,借助理想解的近似顺序法(TOPSIS)对服务主体的可信协作程度进行综合评价。通过案例分析,证明了所提方法的实用性和有效性,证实了该模型在提高云制造模式下协作评价可靠性方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
alexandria engineering journal
alexandria engineering journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
1015
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Alexandria Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publishing high quality papers in the field of engineering and applied science. Alexandria Engineering Journal is cited in the Engineering Information Services (EIS) and the Chemical Abstracts (CA). The papers published in Alexandria Engineering Journal are grouped into five sections, according to the following classification: • Mechanical, Production, Marine and Textile Engineering • Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Nuclear Engineering • Civil and Architecture Engineering • Chemical Engineering and Applied Sciences • Environmental Engineering
期刊最新文献
Shuffle-PG: Lightweight feature extraction model for retrieving images of plant diseases and pests with deep metric learning Intelligence algorithm for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases based on immune monitoring and neuroscience: A revolutionary tool for translational medicine Optimal compensation method for centrifugal impeller considering aerodynamic performance and dimensional accuracy Fractional-order PID feedback synthesis controller including some external influences on insulin and glucose monitoring IoT-based approach to multimodal music emotion recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1