Is pre-extubation fasting in ICU justified? Insights from a prospective observational study using gastric ultrasound

IF 1.4 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tacc.2024.101497
Mohd Saif Khan , Barun Ram , Amit Kumar , Kamel Bousselmi , Priyesh Kumar , Dumini Soren , Priyanka Shrivastava , Naveen Kumar
{"title":"Is pre-extubation fasting in ICU justified? Insights from a prospective observational study using gastric ultrasound","authors":"Mohd Saif Khan ,&nbsp;Barun Ram ,&nbsp;Amit Kumar ,&nbsp;Kamel Bousselmi ,&nbsp;Priyesh Kumar ,&nbsp;Dumini Soren ,&nbsp;Priyanka Shrivastava ,&nbsp;Naveen Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.tacc.2024.101497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In order to mitigate the risk of aspiration pneumonia, it is common practice to recommend fasting for critically ill patients who are undergoing elective tracheal extubation. This clinical investigation seeks to question and reassess this standard fasting protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Aims &amp; objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to determine the role of gastric ultrasound in critically ill patients before a planned tracheal extubation. Main objectives of this study were to assess prevalence of at-risk stomach (full stomach) and the rates of safe extubation in fasted and non-fasted patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Gastric ultrasound was performed on 60 critically ill patients prior to tracheal extubation to assess cross-sectional area (CSA) and calculate gastric volume. Patients with a volume exceeding 1.5 mL/kg or thick fluid were classified as ‘at-risk’ for aspiration (full stomach). All patients were monitored for aspiration pneumonitis during the 24 h following extubation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall prevalence of at-risk stomachs (full stomach) was 40 %, showing no difference between fasted and non-fasted groups (50 % vs. 30 %; p = 0.114). Calculated gastric volumes were also similar across both groups (0.95 ± 0.58 vs. 0.86 ± 0.48 mL/kg; p = 0.574). The safe extubation rate did not significantly differ between fasted and non-fasted groups (86.7 % vs. 93.3 %; p = 0.39). Ongoing opioid use was identified as an independent predictor of at-risk stomach (adjusted odds ratio, 5.54; p = 0.016).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The prevalence of at-risk stomach (full stomach) was high in our cohort. Pre-extubation fasting did not decrease gastric volumes, as assessed by ultrasound, while ongoing opioid use was an independent predictor of an ‘at-risk’ stomach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44534,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101497"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210844024001667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In order to mitigate the risk of aspiration pneumonia, it is common practice to recommend fasting for critically ill patients who are undergoing elective tracheal extubation. This clinical investigation seeks to question and reassess this standard fasting protocol.

Aims & objectives

This study aimed to determine the role of gastric ultrasound in critically ill patients before a planned tracheal extubation. Main objectives of this study were to assess prevalence of at-risk stomach (full stomach) and the rates of safe extubation in fasted and non-fasted patients.

Methods

Gastric ultrasound was performed on 60 critically ill patients prior to tracheal extubation to assess cross-sectional area (CSA) and calculate gastric volume. Patients with a volume exceeding 1.5 mL/kg or thick fluid were classified as ‘at-risk’ for aspiration (full stomach). All patients were monitored for aspiration pneumonitis during the 24 h following extubation.

Results

The overall prevalence of at-risk stomachs (full stomach) was 40 %, showing no difference between fasted and non-fasted groups (50 % vs. 30 %; p = 0.114). Calculated gastric volumes were also similar across both groups (0.95 ± 0.58 vs. 0.86 ± 0.48 mL/kg; p = 0.574). The safe extubation rate did not significantly differ between fasted and non-fasted groups (86.7 % vs. 93.3 %; p = 0.39). Ongoing opioid use was identified as an independent predictor of at-risk stomach (adjusted odds ratio, 5.54; p = 0.016).

Conclusions

The prevalence of at-risk stomach (full stomach) was high in our cohort. Pre-extubation fasting did not decrease gastric volumes, as assessed by ultrasound, while ongoing opioid use was an independent predictor of an ‘at-risk’ stomach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ICU 拔管前禁食是否合理?使用胃超声进行前瞻性观察研究的启示
背景为了降低吸入性肺炎的风险,通常的做法是建议接受择期气管插管的重症患者禁食。本临床调查旨在质疑和重新评估这一标准禁食方案。本研究旨在确定胃超声在计划气管插管前对重症患者的作用。方法:在气管插管前对 60 名重症患者进行胃部超声检查,以评估横截面积(CSA)并计算胃容量。胃容量超过 1.5 mL/kg 或胃液粘稠的患者被归类为吸入 "高危 "患者(全胃)。所有患者在拔管后的 24 小时内均接受了吸入性肺炎的监测。结果高危胃部(满胃)的总体发病率为 40%,禁食组和非禁食组之间没有差异(50% 对 30%;P = 0.114)。两组的计算胃容量也相似(0.95 ± 0.58 vs. 0.86 ± 0.48 mL/kg;p = 0.574)。禁食组和非禁食组的安全拔管率没有明显差异(86.7% vs. 93.3%;p = 0.39)。持续使用阿片类药物被认为是胃部危险的独立预测因素(调整后的几率比为 5.54;P = 0.016)。根据超声波评估,拔管前禁食不会减少胃容量,而持续使用阿片类药物是 "危险 "胃的独立预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
60
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
The advantages of “closed” type management in intensive care units Vasoactive drugs for the management of maternal arterial hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. An updated integrative narrative review A knife to the neck; An airway challenge for the Anesthesiologist: A case report Optimizing patient safety: Unveiling the significance of cuff pressure in anaesthesia Evaluation of changes in Mallampati grading in patients undergoing elective urological procedures in prone and lithotomy positions- A prospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1