Is there an association between colonisation of vancomycin resistant Enterococci, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, or Clostridiodes Difficile and mortality in sepsis?

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Prevention in Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100413
Matthew JG. Sigakis , Joseph Posluszny , Michael D. Maile , Elizabeth S. Jewell , Milo Engoren
{"title":"Is there an association between colonisation of vancomycin resistant Enterococci, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, or Clostridiodes Difficile and mortality in sepsis?","authors":"Matthew JG. Sigakis ,&nbsp;Joseph Posluszny ,&nbsp;Michael D. Maile ,&nbsp;Elizabeth S. Jewell ,&nbsp;Milo Engoren","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To determine if colonisation with drug resistant organisms is associated with worse outcomes in patients who subsequently develop sepsis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective study of patients with sepsis employing logistic regression and linear regression to determine the independent association of colonisation with adverse outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mortality was higher in patients colonized with VRE [501 of 1937 (26%) v. 1052 of 5624 (19%) non-VRE colonised patients, difference 7% (95% confidence interval (5,9%), p&lt;0.001] and MRSA [168 of 708 (24%) v 1342 of 6804 (20%) non-MRSA colonised patients, difference 4% (1,7%), p = 0.014]. CDiff colonisation was not associated with increased mortality [153 of 757 (21%) v 762 of 7432 (18%), difference 3% (0,6%), p=0.052]. After multivariable logistic regression, VRE colonisation remained associated with increased hospital mortality [odds ratio = 1.273, 95% confidence interval (1.099, 1.475), p = 0.001]. VRE colonisation was also associated with subsequent receipt of mechanical ventilation [odds ratio = 1.179, 95% confidence interval (1.043, 1.334), p = 0.009] and with receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT) [OR = 1.36 (1.11, 1.66), p = 0.003].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found that VRE colonisation, but not MRSA or C. diff colonisation, was associated with increased hospital mortality in septic patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"6 4","pages":"Article 100413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To determine if colonisation with drug resistant organisms is associated with worse outcomes in patients who subsequently develop sepsis.

Methods

Retrospective study of patients with sepsis employing logistic regression and linear regression to determine the independent association of colonisation with adverse outcomes.

Results

Mortality was higher in patients colonized with VRE [501 of 1937 (26%) v. 1052 of 5624 (19%) non-VRE colonised patients, difference 7% (95% confidence interval (5,9%), p<0.001] and MRSA [168 of 708 (24%) v 1342 of 6804 (20%) non-MRSA colonised patients, difference 4% (1,7%), p = 0.014]. CDiff colonisation was not associated with increased mortality [153 of 757 (21%) v 762 of 7432 (18%), difference 3% (0,6%), p=0.052]. After multivariable logistic regression, VRE colonisation remained associated with increased hospital mortality [odds ratio = 1.273, 95% confidence interval (1.099, 1.475), p = 0.001]. VRE colonisation was also associated with subsequent receipt of mechanical ventilation [odds ratio = 1.179, 95% confidence interval (1.043, 1.334), p = 0.009] and with receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT) [OR = 1.36 (1.11, 1.66), p = 0.003].

Conclusions

We found that VRE colonisation, but not MRSA or C. diff colonisation, was associated with increased hospital mortality in septic patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耐万古霉素肠球菌、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌或艰难梭菌的定植与败血症死亡率之间是否存在关联?
方法对脓毒症患者进行回顾性研究,采用逻辑回归和线性回归确定定植与不良预后的独立关联。结果VRE定植患者的死亡率较高[1937例患者中的501例(26%)v. 5624例非VRE定植患者中的1052例(19%),差异为7%(95%置信区间(5,9%),p<0.001)],MRSA定植患者的死亡率较高[708例患者中的168例(24%)v. 6804例非MRSA定植患者中的1342例(20%),差异为4%(1,7%),p = 0.014]。CDiff 定植与死亡率增加无关[757 例中的 153 例(21%)v 7432 例中的 762 例(18%),差异为 3% (0,6%),P=0.052]。多变量逻辑回归后,VRE 定植仍与住院死亡率增加相关[几率比 = 1.273,95% 置信区间 (1.099, 1.475),p = 0.001]。VRE 定植还与随后接受机械通气[几率比 = 1.179,95% 置信区间 (1.043,1.334),p = 0.009]和接受肾脏替代治疗 (RRT) [OR = 1.36 (1.11,1.66),p = 0.003]有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Rapid implementation of a clinical decision-support workflow during the national blood culture bottle shortage Low prevalence of borderline oxacillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) in a tertiary care hospital in South Carolina Status of infection prevention and control in Cameroon healthcare facilities: lessons learned from the WHO COVID-19 scorecard tool under the hierarchy of control model Use of ICD-9-CM coding for identifying antibiotic prescriptions during hospitalization: a Delphi consensus model Effect of the implementation of infection prevention measures by an infection prevention link physician in trauma and orthopaedic surgery on hygiene-relevant processes and nosocomial infections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1