Methicillin and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and associated risk factors among patients with wound infection in East Wallaga Zone, Western Ethiopia

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Prevention in Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100409
Milkias Abebe , Getachew Alemkere , Gizachew Ayele
{"title":"Methicillin and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and associated risk factors among patients with wound infection in East Wallaga Zone, Western Ethiopia","authors":"Milkias Abebe ,&nbsp;Getachew Alemkere ,&nbsp;Gizachew Ayele","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Methicillin and vancomycin-resistant <em>S. aureus</em> have become increasingly problematic in recent years. This may be explained by the indiscriminate use of this antibiotic. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (VRSA) and associated risk factors in patients with wound infections in the East Wallaga Zone, Western Ethiopia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A hospital-based cross-sectional prospective study was conducted on 384 patients with wound infections including surgical wound who sought healthcare at Nekemte Specialized Hospital. Wound samples were collected using aseptic techniques and cultured on blood agar and mannitol salt agar. Vancomycin E-test and cefoxitin (30 μg) antibiotic disc diffusion were used to detect MRSA and VRSA, respectively. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23, and a <em>P</em>-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 384 wound samples collected, 109 (28.4%) were identified as <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>. Of these, 40.4% (44/109) were identified as MRSA, and 7.3% (8/109) were VRSA. Thirty-two (72.7%) MRSA isolates were showed multidrug resistance. The depth of the wound, patient setting, history of wound infection, and history of antibiotic use became significantly associated with the prevalence of MRSA wound infection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study found significant levels of <em>S. aureus</em>, MRSA, and VRSA in patients with wound infection. Therefore, it is crucial to implement effective infection prevention and control measures to prevent the spread of antimicrobial resistance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"6 4","pages":"Article 100409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Methicillin and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus have become increasingly problematic in recent years. This may be explained by the indiscriminate use of this antibiotic. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) and associated risk factors in patients with wound infections in the East Wallaga Zone, Western Ethiopia.

Methods

A hospital-based cross-sectional prospective study was conducted on 384 patients with wound infections including surgical wound who sought healthcare at Nekemte Specialized Hospital. Wound samples were collected using aseptic techniques and cultured on blood agar and mannitol salt agar. Vancomycin E-test and cefoxitin (30 μg) antibiotic disc diffusion were used to detect MRSA and VRSA, respectively. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23, and a P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 384 wound samples collected, 109 (28.4%) were identified as Staphylococcus aureus. Of these, 40.4% (44/109) were identified as MRSA, and 7.3% (8/109) were VRSA. Thirty-two (72.7%) MRSA isolates were showed multidrug resistance. The depth of the wound, patient setting, history of wound infection, and history of antibiotic use became significantly associated with the prevalence of MRSA wound infection.

Conclusions

This study found significant levels of S. aureus, MRSA, and VRSA in patients with wound infection. Therefore, it is crucial to implement effective infection prevention and control measures to prevent the spread of antimicrobial resistance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚西部东瓦拉加区伤口感染患者中的耐甲氧西林和耐万古霉素金黄色葡萄球菌及相关风险因素
背景近年来,耐甲氧西林和耐万古霉素金黄色葡萄球菌的问题日益严重。这可能与滥用这种抗生素有关。本研究旨在确定埃塞俄比亚西部东瓦拉加区伤口感染患者中耐甲氧西林和耐万古霉素金黄色葡萄球菌(VRSA)的流行率及相关风险因素。方法对在内克姆特专科医院就医的 384 名伤口感染(包括手术伤口)患者进行了医院横断面前瞻性研究。采用无菌技术采集伤口样本,并在血琼脂和甘露醇盐琼脂上进行培养。万古霉素 E 试验和头孢西丁(30 μg)抗生素盘扩散试验分别用于检测 MRSA 和 VRSA。数据采用 SPSS 23 版进行分析,P 值小于 0.05 为具有统计学意义。其中,40.4%(44/109)被鉴定为 MRSA,7.3%(8/109)为 VRSA。32株(72.7%)MRSA分离物显示出多重耐药性。伤口深度、患者环境、伤口感染史和抗生素使用史与 MRSA 伤口感染率显著相关。因此,实施有效的感染预防和控制措施以防止抗菌药耐药性的传播至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Rapid implementation of a clinical decision-support workflow during the national blood culture bottle shortage Low prevalence of borderline oxacillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) in a tertiary care hospital in South Carolina Status of infection prevention and control in Cameroon healthcare facilities: lessons learned from the WHO COVID-19 scorecard tool under the hierarchy of control model Use of ICD-9-CM coding for identifying antibiotic prescriptions during hospitalization: a Delphi consensus model Effect of the implementation of infection prevention measures by an infection prevention link physician in trauma and orthopaedic surgery on hygiene-relevant processes and nosocomial infections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1