Jongki Lee, Akram Syed Ali, Afshin Farmarzi, Urwa Irfan, Christopher Riley, Brent Stephens, Mohammad Heidarinejad
{"title":"Assessing the long-term energy performance of automated interior insulating window shades in a high-rise commercial building","authors":"Jongki Lee, Akram Syed Ali, Afshin Farmarzi, Urwa Irfan, Christopher Riley, Brent Stephens, Mohammad Heidarinejad","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluated the HVAC energy end-use performance of 39 motorized insulating interior shades installed on the 37th floor of a high-rise commercial building in Chicago, Illinois, USA operating under realistic conditions. The study lasted for 44 weeks (spanning all four seasons). Three motorized control strategies of On-schedule, Dynamic (‘smart’), and Manual, as well as one typical mini-blind Baseline control strategy, were developed and implemented to assess energy performance of the interior automated shades. The three controlled motorized control strategies are compared to the Baseline strategy as a reference. The results showed that the motorized interior insulating shades reduced daily energy consumption by up to 20.5 % with the automated control strategy, which includes the Dynamic and On-schedule strategies, and up to 11.8 % without the control, which includes only the Manual control strategy. A weather normalized energy consumption analysis, which translates the actual energy consumption values to typical year energy consumption values, indicates that the automated shades are expected to save 20–35 % in energy consumption compared to the Baseline strategy. The calculated payback period for a defined “best practice” scenario is 21.9 years considering an initial electricity rate of $0.0897/kWh in 2021. Accounting for a future utility incentive program that provides a one-time rebate of $0.25/kWh savings during the installation, the simple payback period for the “best practice” scenario was estimated to be 12.3 years with the 2021 electricity rate and 4.4 years with assumptions for future electricity rates. Results suggest that the shades are a promising energy efficiency measure, especially for buildings for which building envelope retrofits or new construction are cost prohibitive or infeasible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 124797"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924021809","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluated the HVAC energy end-use performance of 39 motorized insulating interior shades installed on the 37th floor of a high-rise commercial building in Chicago, Illinois, USA operating under realistic conditions. The study lasted for 44 weeks (spanning all four seasons). Three motorized control strategies of On-schedule, Dynamic (‘smart’), and Manual, as well as one typical mini-blind Baseline control strategy, were developed and implemented to assess energy performance of the interior automated shades. The three controlled motorized control strategies are compared to the Baseline strategy as a reference. The results showed that the motorized interior insulating shades reduced daily energy consumption by up to 20.5 % with the automated control strategy, which includes the Dynamic and On-schedule strategies, and up to 11.8 % without the control, which includes only the Manual control strategy. A weather normalized energy consumption analysis, which translates the actual energy consumption values to typical year energy consumption values, indicates that the automated shades are expected to save 20–35 % in energy consumption compared to the Baseline strategy. The calculated payback period for a defined “best practice” scenario is 21.9 years considering an initial electricity rate of $0.0897/kWh in 2021. Accounting for a future utility incentive program that provides a one-time rebate of $0.25/kWh savings during the installation, the simple payback period for the “best practice” scenario was estimated to be 12.3 years with the 2021 electricity rate and 4.4 years with assumptions for future electricity rates. Results suggest that the shades are a promising energy efficiency measure, especially for buildings for which building envelope retrofits or new construction are cost prohibitive or infeasible.
期刊介绍:
Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.