Consumer behavior in circular business models: Unveiling conservation and rebound effects

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Sustainable Production and Consumption Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.spc.2024.10.022
Michał Bączyk, Vivian Tunn, Ernst Worrell, Blanca Corona
{"title":"Consumer behavior in circular business models: Unveiling conservation and rebound effects","authors":"Michał Bączyk,&nbsp;Vivian Tunn,&nbsp;Ernst Worrell,&nbsp;Blanca Corona","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.10.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Consumer engagement with circular business models can either foster sustainable consumption or drive circular economy rebound effects. Many studies assessing the environmental benefits of circular business models rely on assumptions about consumer behavior or do not explicitly address rebound effects. Consequently, the environmental benefits of circular business models might be overestimated. To consolidate current knowledge, we revisit 30 empirical case studies of business-to-consumer and consumer-to-consumer circular business models. To critically evaluate the overlap between circular and sustainable consumption, we assess consumer behavior from the perspective of conservation and rebound effects accounting for the contextual factors influencing consumer behavior, and we appraise the environmental impacts of circular consumption. We identify seven rebound mechanisms (consumption accumulation, income rebound, direct and indirect motivational rebound, respending, substitution rebound, and product care rebound) and four conservation mechanisms (consumption reduction, demand displacement, substitution, and product lifetime extension). The results of the environmental impact assessments are aligned with observations about consumer behavior, revealing cases in which circular consumption, compared to linear consumption, leads to both lower impacts despite rebound effects and higher impacts because of backfire effects. Rebound effects seem likely when the value proposition entails convenience or enables new forms of consumption, while conservation effects seem likely when business models promote sufficiency. Our findings emphasize that circular consumption is not inherently sustainable, highlighting the influence of the context of consumption and business model design on consumer behavior. We argue that the mitigation of consumer-level rebound effects should entail a user-centric business model design integrating sustainability principles, as well as consideration of potential rebound effects in a circular economy policy design. This study sheds light on the challenges and opportunities in achieving circular and sustainable consumption. We derive directions for future studies, calling for interdisciplinary approaches integrating psychological and sociological explanations of consumer behavior to identify and quantify rebound effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"52 ","pages":"Pages 283-298"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924003087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumer engagement with circular business models can either foster sustainable consumption or drive circular economy rebound effects. Many studies assessing the environmental benefits of circular business models rely on assumptions about consumer behavior or do not explicitly address rebound effects. Consequently, the environmental benefits of circular business models might be overestimated. To consolidate current knowledge, we revisit 30 empirical case studies of business-to-consumer and consumer-to-consumer circular business models. To critically evaluate the overlap between circular and sustainable consumption, we assess consumer behavior from the perspective of conservation and rebound effects accounting for the contextual factors influencing consumer behavior, and we appraise the environmental impacts of circular consumption. We identify seven rebound mechanisms (consumption accumulation, income rebound, direct and indirect motivational rebound, respending, substitution rebound, and product care rebound) and four conservation mechanisms (consumption reduction, demand displacement, substitution, and product lifetime extension). The results of the environmental impact assessments are aligned with observations about consumer behavior, revealing cases in which circular consumption, compared to linear consumption, leads to both lower impacts despite rebound effects and higher impacts because of backfire effects. Rebound effects seem likely when the value proposition entails convenience or enables new forms of consumption, while conservation effects seem likely when business models promote sufficiency. Our findings emphasize that circular consumption is not inherently sustainable, highlighting the influence of the context of consumption and business model design on consumer behavior. We argue that the mitigation of consumer-level rebound effects should entail a user-centric business model design integrating sustainability principles, as well as consideration of potential rebound effects in a circular economy policy design. This study sheds light on the challenges and opportunities in achieving circular and sustainable consumption. We derive directions for future studies, calling for interdisciplinary approaches integrating psychological and sociological explanations of consumer behavior to identify and quantify rebound effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循环商业模式中的消费者行为:揭示节约和反弹效应
消费者参与循环商业模式既可以促进可持续消费,也可以推动循环经济的反弹效应。许多评估循环商业模式环境效益的研究都依赖于对消费者行为的假设,或者没有明确涉及反弹效应。因此,循环商业模式的环境效益可能被高估。为了巩固现有知识,我们重新审视了 30 个关于企业对消费者和消费者对消费者循环商业模式的实证案例研究。为了批判性地评估循环消费和可持续消费之间的重叠,我们从保护和反弹效应的角度评估了消费者行为,并考虑了影响消费者行为的环境因素,还评估了循环消费对环境的影响。我们确定了七种反弹机制(消费积累、收入反弹、直接和间接动机反弹、呼吸、替代反弹和产品护理反弹)和四种保护机制(消费减少、需求转移、替代和产品寿命延长)。环境影响评估的结果与对消费者行为的观察相吻合,揭示了循环消费与线性消费相比,既会因反弹效应而导致较低的影响,也会因逆火效应而导致较高的影响。当价值主张带来便利或促成新的消费形式时,反弹效应似乎很有可能出现,而当商业模式促进充足消费时,保护效应似乎很有可能出现。我们的研究结果强调,循环消费本质上并不是可持续的,突出了消费环境和商业模式设计对消费者行为的影响。我们认为,要缓解消费者层面的反弹效应,就必须以用户为中心,在商业模式设计中融入可持续发展原则,并在循环经济政策设计中考虑潜在的反弹效应。本研究揭示了实现循环和可持续消费所面临的挑战和机遇。我们为今后的研究指明了方向,呼吁采用跨学科方法,结合心理学和社会学对消费者行为的解释,来识别和量化反弹效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
期刊最新文献
A value-sensitive approach for integrated seawater desalination and brine treatment Conceptualizing circular economy policy instruments: The case of recycled content standards A review of life cycle impacts and costs of precision agriculture for cultivation of field crops An interlinked dynamic model of timber and carbon stocks in Japan's wooden houses and plantation forests Lithium from clay: Assessing the environmental impacts of extraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1