Liang Shi , Honglin He , Li Zhang , Junbang Wang , Xiaoli Ren , Guirui Yu , Peng Hou , Jixi Gao , Bin Chen , Keyu Qin , Lili Feng , Shaoqiang Wang , Yan Lv , Mengyu Zhang , Zhongen Niu , Zhaosheng Wang , Mei Huang
{"title":"Stability of China's terrestrial ecosystems carbon sink during 2000-2020","authors":"Liang Shi , Honglin He , Li Zhang , Junbang Wang , Xiaoli Ren , Guirui Yu , Peng Hou , Jixi Gao , Bin Chen , Keyu Qin , Lili Feng , Shaoqiang Wang , Yan Lv , Mengyu Zhang , Zhongen Niu , Zhaosheng Wang , Mei Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China's terrestrial ecosystem carbon sink (TCS) is crucial for the global carbon budget. However, little is known how the enhanced human disturbances and increased extreme climate events may potentially destabilize TCS under warming climate. Using three process-based ecosystem models, we simulated the spatiotemporal variations of China's terrestrial net ecosystem productivity (NEP) from 2000 to 2020. We found that 26.7 % of the land area exhibit simultaneous increases in NEP temporal variability and autocorrelation during this period, indicating an increasing risk of TCS destabilization. Particularly, the southeastern subtropical monsoon region in China emerged as a hot-spot of potentially increasing NEP instability, despite its high carbon sink capacity, both NEP temporal variability and autocorrelation in this area exhibit a notable upward trend. Climate change, notably increasing precipitation and its temporal variation, appeared to be the primary driver of this instability. This harbinger implies that a regime shift in carbon sink capacity may occur as the warming climate continues to push it to the verge of stability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 108007"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924005986","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
China's terrestrial ecosystem carbon sink (TCS) is crucial for the global carbon budget. However, little is known how the enhanced human disturbances and increased extreme climate events may potentially destabilize TCS under warming climate. Using three process-based ecosystem models, we simulated the spatiotemporal variations of China's terrestrial net ecosystem productivity (NEP) from 2000 to 2020. We found that 26.7 % of the land area exhibit simultaneous increases in NEP temporal variability and autocorrelation during this period, indicating an increasing risk of TCS destabilization. Particularly, the southeastern subtropical monsoon region in China emerged as a hot-spot of potentially increasing NEP instability, despite its high carbon sink capacity, both NEP temporal variability and autocorrelation in this area exhibit a notable upward trend. Climate change, notably increasing precipitation and its temporal variation, appeared to be the primary driver of this instability. This harbinger implies that a regime shift in carbon sink capacity may occur as the warming climate continues to push it to the verge of stability.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.