Life focycle assessment of Brazilian bleached eucalyptus kraft pulp: Integrating bleaching processes and biogenic carbon impacts

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Cleaner Environmental Systems Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100234
Rhonald Ortega , Naycari Forfora , Isabel Urdaneta , Ivana Azuaje , Keren A. Vivas , Ramon E. Vera , Jorge Franco , Ryen Frazier , Camilla Abbati , Daniel Saloni , Hasan Jameel , Richard Venditti , Ronalds Gonzalez
{"title":"Life focycle assessment of Brazilian bleached eucalyptus kraft pulp: Integrating bleaching processes and biogenic carbon impacts","authors":"Rhonald Ortega ,&nbsp;Naycari Forfora ,&nbsp;Isabel Urdaneta ,&nbsp;Ivana Azuaje ,&nbsp;Keren A. Vivas ,&nbsp;Ramon E. Vera ,&nbsp;Jorge Franco ,&nbsp;Ryen Frazier ,&nbsp;Camilla Abbati ,&nbsp;Daniel Saloni ,&nbsp;Hasan Jameel ,&nbsp;Richard Venditti ,&nbsp;Ronalds Gonzalez","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bleached eucalyptus kraft (BEK) pulp dominates global pulp production, yet the environmental impacts of its bleaching sequences in Brazil are not fully explored. Addressing this gap, we conducted a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of three bleaching sequences: conventional elemental chlorine-free (ECF), ECF with oxygen delignification, and ECF with oxygen delignification plus acid washing. We estimated the average global warming potential (GWP) for BEK delivered to the U.S. and examined how forest carbon cycle (FCC) elements, specifically biogenic GWP (GWPbio) and potential soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration, influence GWP outcomes. Results show that the ECF sequence with oxygen delignification and acid washing reduces GWP by 11% and outperforms conventional ECF in 10 out of 11 environmental impact categories. The average GWP for Brazilian BEK delivered to the U.S. is 576 kg CO₂-eq/ton. Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that adding GWPbio increases GWP by 18%, whereas accounting for potential SOC sequestration reduces it by 39%. These findings highlight the necessity of optimizing bleaching processes and developing a standardized BEK LCA model for comparing the environmental impact of different fibers. This work sets a precedent for integrating FCC elements into LCAs and underscores the potential of SOC sequestration in mitigating climate change impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100234"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bleached eucalyptus kraft (BEK) pulp dominates global pulp production, yet the environmental impacts of its bleaching sequences in Brazil are not fully explored. Addressing this gap, we conducted a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of three bleaching sequences: conventional elemental chlorine-free (ECF), ECF with oxygen delignification, and ECF with oxygen delignification plus acid washing. We estimated the average global warming potential (GWP) for BEK delivered to the U.S. and examined how forest carbon cycle (FCC) elements, specifically biogenic GWP (GWPbio) and potential soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration, influence GWP outcomes. Results show that the ECF sequence with oxygen delignification and acid washing reduces GWP by 11% and outperforms conventional ECF in 10 out of 11 environmental impact categories. The average GWP for Brazilian BEK delivered to the U.S. is 576 kg CO₂-eq/ton. Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that adding GWPbio increases GWP by 18%, whereas accounting for potential SOC sequestration reduces it by 39%. These findings highlight the necessity of optimizing bleaching processes and developing a standardized BEK LCA model for comparing the environmental impact of different fibers. This work sets a precedent for integrating FCC elements into LCAs and underscores the potential of SOC sequestration in mitigating climate change impacts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西漂白桉树牛皮纸浆的生命周期评估:综合漂白过程和生物碳影响
漂白桉树牛皮纸浆(BEK)在全球纸浆生产中占主导地位,但其在巴西的漂白过程对环境的影响尚未得到充分探讨。针对这一空白,我们对三种漂白程序进行了生命周期比较评估(LCA):传统的无元素氯漂白(ECF)、含氧脱木素漂白(ECF)和含氧脱木素加酸洗漂白(ECF)。我们估算了运往美国的 BEK 的平均全球升温潜能值 (GWP),并研究了森林碳循环 (FCC) 要素,特别是生物源全球升温潜能值 (GWPbio) 和潜在的土壤有机碳 (SOC) 固碳如何影响全球升温潜能值结果。结果表明,氧脱木质素和酸洗的 ECF 序列可将 GWP 降低 11%,在 11 个环境影响类别中的 10 个类别中均优于传统 ECF。运往美国的巴西 BEK 的平均全球升温潜能值为 576 千克 CO₂-eq/吨。敏感性分析表明,增加生物全球升温潜能值会使全球升温潜能值增加 18%,而考虑潜在的 SOC 固存则会使全球升温潜能值降低 39%。这些发现凸显了优化漂白工艺和开发标准化 BEK LCA 模型以比较不同纤维对环境影响的必要性。这项工作开创了将催化裂化碳元素纳入生命周期评估的先例,并强调了 SOC 固碳在减轻气候变化影响方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Life cycle sustainability assessment of microbial oil from organic waste Techno-economic feasibility study of ammonia recovery from sewage sludge digestate in wastewater treatment plants Life focycle assessment of Brazilian bleached eucalyptus kraft pulp: Integrating bleaching processes and biogenic carbon impacts A novel integrated material flow cost accounting (MFCA)- IoT-lean management system approach to improving water use efficiency and reducing costs in the beverage industry Eco-efficiency of coffee production and consumption in the UK at the product and sectoral levels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1