Why do users perceive digital platforms as indispensable to their lives?: A study on KakaoTalk in Korea

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Telecommunications Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102863
Jaeyoung Park, Seongcheol Kim
{"title":"Why do users perceive digital platforms as indispensable to their lives?: A study on KakaoTalk in Korea","authors":"Jaeyoung Park,&nbsp;Seongcheol Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Contemporary daily life heavily relies on a few dominant digital platforms. Despite their pervasive integration into users’ daily routines, scholarly research has primarily focused on assessing the utility of digital platforms rather than on understanding why users perceive them as indispensable. To address this gap, we developed a structural model to examine the factors influencing users’ perceptions of digital platform indispensability, specifically focusing on perceived benefits, perceived risks, and platform habits. We also explored how platform characteristics impact these factors. This study targeted regular KakaoTalk users who utilize multiple Kakao services, given its dominant role in the Korean market. We collected 208 valid responses through an online survey in Korea and analyzed the data using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The results show that users’ perceived benefits and platform habits strongly contribute to perceived digital platform indispensability, while perceived risks have an insignificant impact. Furthermore, platform characteristics such as comprehensiveness and sociability positively influence perceived benefits and platform habits. This study introduces the concept of indispensability in digital platform research and highlights a dual pathway of perceived benefits and platform habits, offering strategic insights for platform providers, regulatory considerations for policymakers, and practical advice for users.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22290,"journal":{"name":"Telecommunications Policy","volume":"48 10","pages":"Article 102863"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telecommunications Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596124001605","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contemporary daily life heavily relies on a few dominant digital platforms. Despite their pervasive integration into users’ daily routines, scholarly research has primarily focused on assessing the utility of digital platforms rather than on understanding why users perceive them as indispensable. To address this gap, we developed a structural model to examine the factors influencing users’ perceptions of digital platform indispensability, specifically focusing on perceived benefits, perceived risks, and platform habits. We also explored how platform characteristics impact these factors. This study targeted regular KakaoTalk users who utilize multiple Kakao services, given its dominant role in the Korean market. We collected 208 valid responses through an online survey in Korea and analyzed the data using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The results show that users’ perceived benefits and platform habits strongly contribute to perceived digital platform indispensability, while perceived risks have an insignificant impact. Furthermore, platform characteristics such as comprehensiveness and sociability positively influence perceived benefits and platform habits. This study introduces the concept of indispensability in digital platform research and highlights a dual pathway of perceived benefits and platform habits, offering strategic insights for platform providers, regulatory considerations for policymakers, and practical advice for users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么用户认为数字平台对其生活不可或缺?韩国 KakaoTalk 研究
当代日常生活在很大程度上依赖于一些占主导地位的数字平台。尽管数字平台已普遍融入用户的日常生活,但学术研究主要集中于评估数字平台的实用性,而不是了解用户为何认为数字平台不可或缺。为了弥补这一不足,我们建立了一个结构模型来研究影响用户对数字平台不可或缺感知的因素,特别是感知到的益处、感知到的风险和平台习惯。我们还探讨了平台特征如何影响这些因素。鉴于 KakaoTalk 在韩国市场的主导地位,本研究以使用多种 Kakao 服务的 KakaoTalk 固定用户为对象。我们在韩国通过在线调查收集了 208 份有效答卷,并使用偏最小二乘法结构方程模型对数据进行了分析。结果表明,用户感知到的收益和平台习惯对感知到的数字平台不可或缺性有很大影响,而感知到的风险则影响不大。此外,全面性和社交性等平台特征也会对感知到的益处和平台习惯产生积极影响。本研究在数字平台研究中引入了 "不可或缺性 "的概念,强调了感知到的好处和平台习惯的双重途径,为平台提供商提供了战略见解,为政策制定者提供了监管考虑,为用户提供了实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telecommunications Policy
Telecommunications Policy 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
122
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Telecommunications Policy is concerned with the impact of digitalization in the economy and society. The journal is multidisciplinary, encompassing conceptual, theoretical and empirical studies, quantitative as well as qualitative. The scope includes policy, regulation, and governance; big data, artificial intelligence and data science; new and traditional sectors encompassing new media and the platform economy; management, entrepreneurship, innovation and use. Contributions may explore these topics at national, regional and international levels, including issues confronting both developed and developing countries. The papers accepted by the journal meet high standards of analytical rigor and policy relevance.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Does affordable Internet promote maternal and child healthcare access? Evidence from a post-telecommunication market disruption period in India Digital discrimination under disparate impact: A legal and economic analysis Willingness to pay for broadband: A case study of Wisconsin Why do users perceive digital platforms as indispensable to their lives?: A study on KakaoTalk in Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1