Achievements in arithmetic and measurement units predict fraction understanding in an additive and linear manner

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Cognitive Development Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101517
Markus Wolfgang Hermann Spitzer , Miguel Ruiz-Garcia , Younes Strittmatter , Eileen Richter , Raphael Gutsfeld , Korbinian Moeller
{"title":"Achievements in arithmetic and measurement units predict fraction understanding in an additive and linear manner","authors":"Markus Wolfgang Hermann Spitzer ,&nbsp;Miguel Ruiz-Garcia ,&nbsp;Younes Strittmatter ,&nbsp;Eileen Richter ,&nbsp;Raphael Gutsfeld ,&nbsp;Korbinian Moeller","doi":"10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Learning fractions is one of the most difficult but nevertheless critical mathematical topics in school as understanding fractions significantly predicts later mathematics achievement and vocational prospects. Importantly, mastery of basic mathematical topics (e.g., arithmetic skills) was repeatedly observed to serve as a stepping stone for learning fractions. However, it has not yet been investigated in detail whether achievements on such basic mathematical topics predict fraction understanding uniquely and linearly or whether there are also multiplicative and non-linear dependencies. Such multiplicative and/or non-linear dependencies would suggest that closing knowledge gaps on key topics is of paramount importance, as knowledge gaps on these topics could have negative consequences for the understanding of fractions. Therefore, we predicted students’ fraction understanding by their performance on four prior topics (i.e., <em>Geometry</em>, <em>Basic Arithmetic</em>, <em>Measurement Units</em>, and <em>Advanced Arithmetic</em>) and compared the fits of different regression models (including topics as main effects only vs. also including interaction and quadratic terms). Our analyses considered three cohorts of students (approximate age range: 12–13 years) attending different school tracks that vary in difficulty (i.e., 6468 students of academic track schools; as well as 4598 students, and 1743 students of two vocational track schools) who used an intelligent tutor system. Results were similar across all three cohorts substantiating the robustness of our results: students’ fraction understanding was linearly predicted by achievements in basic mathematical skills (i.e., arithmetic and measurement units). We found no substantial support favoring more complex models across all three cohorts. As such, the results suggested that achievements in arithmetic and measurement units serve as unique and linear stepping stones for later fraction understanding. These findings suggest that those students with knowledge gaps in arithmetic and measurement units should be encouraged to revise these topics before moving on to more advanced topics—such as fractions—as these more advanced topics build on them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51422,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Development","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 101517"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201424001023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning fractions is one of the most difficult but nevertheless critical mathematical topics in school as understanding fractions significantly predicts later mathematics achievement and vocational prospects. Importantly, mastery of basic mathematical topics (e.g., arithmetic skills) was repeatedly observed to serve as a stepping stone for learning fractions. However, it has not yet been investigated in detail whether achievements on such basic mathematical topics predict fraction understanding uniquely and linearly or whether there are also multiplicative and non-linear dependencies. Such multiplicative and/or non-linear dependencies would suggest that closing knowledge gaps on key topics is of paramount importance, as knowledge gaps on these topics could have negative consequences for the understanding of fractions. Therefore, we predicted students’ fraction understanding by their performance on four prior topics (i.e., Geometry, Basic Arithmetic, Measurement Units, and Advanced Arithmetic) and compared the fits of different regression models (including topics as main effects only vs. also including interaction and quadratic terms). Our analyses considered three cohorts of students (approximate age range: 12–13 years) attending different school tracks that vary in difficulty (i.e., 6468 students of academic track schools; as well as 4598 students, and 1743 students of two vocational track schools) who used an intelligent tutor system. Results were similar across all three cohorts substantiating the robustness of our results: students’ fraction understanding was linearly predicted by achievements in basic mathematical skills (i.e., arithmetic and measurement units). We found no substantial support favoring more complex models across all three cohorts. As such, the results suggested that achievements in arithmetic and measurement units serve as unique and linear stepping stones for later fraction understanding. These findings suggest that those students with knowledge gaps in arithmetic and measurement units should be encouraged to revise these topics before moving on to more advanced topics—such as fractions—as these more advanced topics build on them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
算术和测量单位的成绩以加法和线性的方式预测对分数的理解
学习分数是学校中最困难但又最关键的数学课题之一,因为对分数的理解能极大地预示学生日后的数学成绩和职业前景。重要的是,人们多次观察到,掌握基本数学主题(如算术技能)是学习分数的垫脚石。然而,对于这些基础数学题目的成绩是否能唯一地、线性地预测分数理解能力,或者是否还存在乘法和非线性的依赖关系,还没有进行过详细的研究。这种乘法和/或非线性依赖关系表明,缩小关键题目上的知识差距至关重要,因为这些题目上的知识差距可能会对分数理解产生负面影响。因此,我们通过学生在之前四个主题(即几何、基础算术、度量单位和高级算术)上的表现来预测他们对分数的理解,并比较了不同回归模型的拟合效果(仅将主题作为主效应与同时包含交互项和二次项)。我们的分析考虑了三组使用智能辅导系统的学生(大致年龄范围:12-13 岁),他们就读于不同的学校,难度各异(即学术轨道学校的 6468 名学生;以及两所职业轨道学校的 4598 名学生和 1743 名学生)。三组学生的结果相似,证明了我们结果的稳健性:学生的分数理解能力与基本数学技能(即算术和测量单位)的成绩呈线性预测关系。在所有三个组群中,我们都没有发现更复杂的模型。因此,研究结果表明,算术和测量单位方面的成绩是日后理解分数的独特的线性垫脚石。这些研究结果表明,对于那些在算术和测量单位方面存在知识缺口的学生,应鼓励他们先复习这些内容,然后再学习更高级的内容(如分数),因为这些更高级的内容是建立在他们的基础之上的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Cognitive Development contains the very best empirical and theoretical work on the development of perception, memory, language, concepts, thinking, problem solving, metacognition, and social cognition. Criteria for acceptance of articles will be: significance of the work to issues of current interest, substance of the argument, and clarity of expression. For purposes of publication in Cognitive Development, moral and social development will be considered part of cognitive development when they are related to the development of knowledge or thought processes.
期刊最新文献
From spontaneous focusing on numerosity to mathematics achievement: The mediating role of non-symbolic number processing and mapping between symbolic and non-symbolic representations of number Preschoolers prioritize humans over robots less than adults do: An eye-tracking study Sociolinguistic development in a diverse, multilinguistic environment: Evidence from multilingual children in Gujarat, India Attentional skills, developmental areas, and phonological awareness in children aged 5–6 years Attending to talker characteristics: Word learning and recognition in monolingually- and multilingually-raised infants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1