Gender and age specific dynamics of health-related postoperative outcome measures following the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY Surgery open science Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2024.10.007
Sevak Shahbazyan , Mushegh Mirijanyan , Zhorzheta Badalova , Zareh Ter-Avetikyan
{"title":"Gender and age specific dynamics of health-related postoperative outcome measures following the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy","authors":"Sevak Shahbazyan ,&nbsp;Mushegh Mirijanyan ,&nbsp;Zhorzheta Badalova ,&nbsp;Zareh Ter-Avetikyan","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A variety of bariatric surgical techniques have been implemented to manage obesity, including the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).</div><div>The aim of the study was to compare the pre and postoperative features of patients undergoing LSG, analyze the dynamics of BMI and BAROS indices and to assess the impact of body appearance concern on the postoperative outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 591 participants were divided into 3 age groups (20–39, 40–59 and over 60 years of age). The Charlson Comorbidity Index was used to assess comorbidity in patient groups. The rate of complications, assessment of psychological well-being and number of hospital days for patients were used to compare the features of postoperative recovery in different age groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the young and middle-aged groups, the BMI reduction speed was similar, and significantly higher than in the elder group with a faster rate of BMI reduction in female participants. Higher scores of BAROS were revealed in the young and middle-aged groups for the 0–1 and 1–6 month periods. The 12-month assessment revealed much higher BAROS scores for male subgroups, compared to female participants. The BAROS scores decreased gradually in female groups within the assessment periods and was the lowest in the third assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The pattern of BAROS reduction can be the result of lower psychological and social well-being scores in female participants who reported significant weight reduction in 6–12 month period with paradoxically decreased quality of life scores explained by the impact of body appearance concern on the postoperative outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"22 ","pages":"Pages 67-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024001295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A variety of bariatric surgical techniques have been implemented to manage obesity, including the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).
The aim of the study was to compare the pre and postoperative features of patients undergoing LSG, analyze the dynamics of BMI and BAROS indices and to assess the impact of body appearance concern on the postoperative outcomes.

Methods

A total of 591 participants were divided into 3 age groups (20–39, 40–59 and over 60 years of age). The Charlson Comorbidity Index was used to assess comorbidity in patient groups. The rate of complications, assessment of psychological well-being and number of hospital days for patients were used to compare the features of postoperative recovery in different age groups.

Results

In the young and middle-aged groups, the BMI reduction speed was similar, and significantly higher than in the elder group with a faster rate of BMI reduction in female participants. Higher scores of BAROS were revealed in the young and middle-aged groups for the 0–1 and 1–6 month periods. The 12-month assessment revealed much higher BAROS scores for male subgroups, compared to female participants. The BAROS scores decreased gradually in female groups within the assessment periods and was the lowest in the third assessment.

Conclusions

The pattern of BAROS reduction can be the result of lower psychological and social well-being scores in female participants who reported significant weight reduction in 6–12 month period with paradoxically decreased quality of life scores explained by the impact of body appearance concern on the postoperative outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜袖带胃切除术后与健康相关的术后结果测量的性别和年龄特征动态变化
研究目的是比较接受腹腔镜袖带胃切除术(LSG)的患者的术前和术后特征,分析 BMI 和 BAROS 指数的动态变化,并评估对身体外观的关注对术后结果的影响。研究方法将 591 名参与者分为 3 个年龄组(20-39 岁、40-59 岁和 60 岁以上)。采用夏尔森合并症指数(Charlson Comorbidity Index)评估各组患者的合并症。结果 在青年组和中年组中,BMI 下降速度相似,且明显高于老年组,女性参与者的 BMI 下降速度更快。年轻组和中年组在 0-1 个月和 1-6 个月期间的 BAROS 分数较高。在 12 个月的评估中,与女性参与者相比,男性亚组的 BAROS 分数要高得多。结论 BAROS 分数降低的模式可能是女性参与者的心理和社会幸福感分数降低的结果,她们在 6 至 12 个月期间体重明显减轻,但生活质量分数却下降,这是因为对身体外观的担忧影响了术后效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
See one, teach yourself one, do one: Barriers and opportunities in self-administered training and assessment for global surgical education Management of Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: A systematic review of national and International Clinical Guidelines (CoSMIC-G) Primary delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy: A matched-pair comparison of Roux-en-Y vs. Billroth-II reconstruction Immersive collaborative virtual reality for case-based graduate student teaching in thoracic surgery: A piloting study Engagement and learning approaches among medical students in an online surgical teaching programme: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1