The Change towards the Integration of Agri-environmental Practices (CIAEP) into farmer’s practices system: An affective, cognitive, and behavioural process

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Journal of Rural Studies Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103479
Aurélie Dumont, Julie Ruiz, Stéphane Campeau
{"title":"The Change towards the Integration of Agri-environmental Practices (CIAEP) into farmer’s practices system: An affective, cognitive, and behavioural process","authors":"Aurélie Dumont,&nbsp;Julie Ruiz,&nbsp;Stéphane Campeau","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article contributes to the research characterising agri-environmental practices (AEPs) adoption processes. Although the adoption of AEPs by farmers has long been recognised as a process, existing conceptualisations vary significantly and face theoretical and operational limitations that limit the ability of research to accurately describe and understand these processes. In this paper, we propose a new conceptualisation of AEPs adoption processes, supported by psychological theories and data from a longitudinal case study of 20 farmers in Quebec, Canada. We develop an empirically informed operational framework for analysing AEP adoption processes: the Change towards the Integration of Agri-environmental Practices (CIAEP) framework. The CIAEP focuses on the internal processes farmers undergo to integrate AEPs, framing integration as a process involving cognitive, affective, and behavioural changes, including the acceptance of the loss of previous practices. It defines a seven-stage process with associated indicators, ranging from no intention to change to the integration of an AEP into a farming practices system. By including affective dimensions alongside established cognitive and behavioural components, the CIAEP enriches existing conceptualisations of AEP adoption processes. It introduces new stages that explain how farmers decide to commit to adopting AEPs and defines integration as the technical, affective, and cognitive mastery of an AEP, offering a fresh perspective on the concept of adoption. This article outlines the development of the CIAEP framework, its application in the case study, and provides two examples of its use based on partial longitudinal data. Finally, we discuss the benefits, limitations, and research opportunities presented by the CIAEP framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 103479"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016724002833","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article contributes to the research characterising agri-environmental practices (AEPs) adoption processes. Although the adoption of AEPs by farmers has long been recognised as a process, existing conceptualisations vary significantly and face theoretical and operational limitations that limit the ability of research to accurately describe and understand these processes. In this paper, we propose a new conceptualisation of AEPs adoption processes, supported by psychological theories and data from a longitudinal case study of 20 farmers in Quebec, Canada. We develop an empirically informed operational framework for analysing AEP adoption processes: the Change towards the Integration of Agri-environmental Practices (CIAEP) framework. The CIAEP focuses on the internal processes farmers undergo to integrate AEPs, framing integration as a process involving cognitive, affective, and behavioural changes, including the acceptance of the loss of previous practices. It defines a seven-stage process with associated indicators, ranging from no intention to change to the integration of an AEP into a farming practices system. By including affective dimensions alongside established cognitive and behavioural components, the CIAEP enriches existing conceptualisations of AEP adoption processes. It introduces new stages that explain how farmers decide to commit to adopting AEPs and defines integration as the technical, affective, and cognitive mastery of an AEP, offering a fresh perspective on the concept of adoption. This article outlines the development of the CIAEP framework, its application in the case study, and provides two examples of its use based on partial longitudinal data. Finally, we discuss the benefits, limitations, and research opportunities presented by the CIAEP framework.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将农业环境实践(CIAEP)纳入农民实践体系的变革:情感、认知和行为过程
本文有助于研究农业环保措施(AEPs)的采用过程。尽管农民采用农业环保措施的过程早已被公认为是一个过程,但现有的概念差异很大,并面临着理论和操作上的局限性,限制了研究准确描述和理解这些过程的能力。在本文中,我们以心理学理论和对加拿大魁北克省 20 位农民的纵向案例研究数据为支撑,提出了一种新的 AEPs 采用过程概念。我们开发了一个基于经验的操作框架,用于分析农业环保措施的采用过程:农业环保措施整合变革(CIAEP)框架。CIAEP 侧重于农民整合农业环保措施的内部过程,将整合视为一个涉及认知、情感和行为变化的过程,包括接受先前做法的损失。它定义了一个七阶段的过程,并附有相关指标,从无意改变到将农业生态学纳入耕作实践系统。CIAEP 将情感因素与既有的认知和行为因素结合起来,丰富了现有的农业实践采纳过程概念。它引入了新的阶段来解释农民如何决定采用农业环保措施,并将整合定义为对农业环保措施的技术、情感和认知掌握,从而为采用概念提供了一个全新的视角。本文概述了 CIAEP 框架的发展及其在案例研究中的应用,并提供了两个基于部分纵向数据的使用实例。最后,我们讨论了 CIAEP 框架的优点、局限性和研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
期刊最新文献
Creative assets, people, and places: Rural art action practices of US nonprofit organizations "ICI ON TRAVAILLE: The role of cooperatives in structuring social relations of production in artisanal and small-scale gold mining in Eastern DRC Spatial-temporal patterns and driving mechanism of rural vulneraiblity at county level:A case study of 117 counties in Heilongjiang Province, China The Change towards the Integration of Agri-environmental Practices (CIAEP) into farmer’s practices system: An affective, cognitive, and behavioural process “They just get on with it”: How innovating firms in a rural region navigate issues of market access
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1