How antitrust enforcement affects corporate ESG performance? Evidence from merger review cases in China

IF 7.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Analysis and Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eap.2024.10.037
Fang Yi, Chenru Cao, Jingxuan Xu
{"title":"How antitrust enforcement affects corporate ESG performance? Evidence from merger review cases in China","authors":"Fang Yi,&nbsp;Chenru Cao,&nbsp;Jingxuan Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2024.10.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chinese unique treatment of unreported merger cases (which should be reported according to antitrust law) in the context of merger review provides a distinctive and robust control group for the Difference-in-Differences (DID) research method. We employ the DID method to investigate the impact of China’s merger review antitrust enforcement on Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) performance. We find that the implementation of merger review antitrust enforcement suppresses corporate ESG performance, especially with significant effects observed on the Environment (E) and Governance (G) components. Mechanism analysis indicates that antitrust enforcement poses an impact on corporate profits by reducing market concentration and safeguarding fair market competition. This leads to the emergence of corporate financial performance protection behaviors, resulting in a decrease in corporate ESG performance. Heterogeneous analysis finds that the use of structural remedy in the enforcement process and stronger antitrust enforcement will further intensify the inhibitory effect of antitrust enforcement against business concentration on ESG.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"84 ","pages":"Pages 1730-1746"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624002923","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chinese unique treatment of unreported merger cases (which should be reported according to antitrust law) in the context of merger review provides a distinctive and robust control group for the Difference-in-Differences (DID) research method. We employ the DID method to investigate the impact of China’s merger review antitrust enforcement on Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) performance. We find that the implementation of merger review antitrust enforcement suppresses corporate ESG performance, especially with significant effects observed on the Environment (E) and Governance (G) components. Mechanism analysis indicates that antitrust enforcement poses an impact on corporate profits by reducing market concentration and safeguarding fair market competition. This leads to the emergence of corporate financial performance protection behaviors, resulting in a decrease in corporate ESG performance. Heterogeneous analysis finds that the use of structural remedy in the enforcement process and stronger antitrust enforcement will further intensify the inhibitory effect of antitrust enforcement against business concentration on ESG.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反垄断执法如何影响企业ESG绩效?来自中国兼并审查案例的证据
中国在兼并审查中对未报告兼并案件(根据反垄断法应当报告)的独特处理方式,为差分法(DID)研究方法提供了一个独特而稳健的控制组。我们采用 DID 方法研究了中国兼并审查反垄断执法对环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效的影响。我们发现,并购审查反垄断执法的实施抑制了企业的环境、社会和治理绩效,尤其是对环境(E)和治理(G)部分产生了显著影响。机制分析表明,反垄断执法通过降低市场集中度和维护市场公平竞争对企业利润产生影响。这导致了企业财务绩效保护行为的出现,从而降低了企业的环境、社会和治理绩效。异质性分析发现,在执法过程中使用结构性补救措施和加强反垄断执法力度将进一步强化反垄断执法对企业集中度对 ESG 的抑制作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
期刊最新文献
How does macroprudential policy affect the relationship between financial openness and bank risk-taking Employee stock ownership plans and controlling shareholders’ over-appointing of directors The economic implications of population aging on current account balance Can linguistic big data empower digital economy?: Evidence from China Return-to-hometown entrepreneurship and employment of low-income households: Evidence from national returned entrepreneurial enterprise data of China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1