Ageu da Silva Monteiro Freire , Kyvia Pontes Teixeira das Chagas , Fernanda Moura Fonseca Lucas , Jaçanan Eloisa de Freitas Milani , Pedro Henrique Gonzalez de Cademartori , Christopher Thomas Blum
{"title":"Overview of saponin-producing species of Quillajaceae from a global perspective","authors":"Ageu da Silva Monteiro Freire , Kyvia Pontes Teixeira das Chagas , Fernanda Moura Fonseca Lucas , Jaçanan Eloisa de Freitas Milani , Pedro Henrique Gonzalez de Cademartori , Christopher Thomas Blum","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2024.104919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The search for knowledge about forest species to support their conservation and sustainable use is crucial given the anthropogenic threats faced. The <em>Quillaja</em> genus holds pharmacological and economic relevance but faces risks of extinction. Thus, this study analyzes global scientific studies on the two species of this genus, to identify key scientific advances and conservation gaps concerning <em>Quillaja saponaria</em> and <em>Quillaja lancifolia</em>. A bibliometric review was conducted covering all published research on the topic in the Scopus database until 2022. Only scientific articles focusing on the respective species were considered, resulting in 552 documents involving <em>Q. saponaria</em> and 26 for <em>Q. lancifolia</em>. The country with the highest number of publications on <em>Q. saponaria</em> is the United States, followed by Chile, where the species occurs. With regard to <em>Q. lancifolia</em>, Brazil leads with the highest number of publications, followed by Uruguay. Saponins are the most extensively studied compounds produced by both species, exhibiting various types with different constituents and applications. The bark of <em>Q. saponaria</em> (92%) and the leaves of <em>Q. lancifolia</em> (84%) have been studied the most. The field of health sciences comprises the largest number of publications on both species, which have applications as vaccine adjuvants. However, a gap was identified in the realm of ecological studies, considering the potential of these species for restoring degraded areas. Hence, there is a need to expand silvicultural and conservation research, particularly given the strong demand for saponin production. Additionally, efforts to diversify techniques for sustainable exploitation should be encouraged to ensure the conservation of these species.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 104919"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197824001376","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The search for knowledge about forest species to support their conservation and sustainable use is crucial given the anthropogenic threats faced. The Quillaja genus holds pharmacological and economic relevance but faces risks of extinction. Thus, this study analyzes global scientific studies on the two species of this genus, to identify key scientific advances and conservation gaps concerning Quillaja saponaria and Quillaja lancifolia. A bibliometric review was conducted covering all published research on the topic in the Scopus database until 2022. Only scientific articles focusing on the respective species were considered, resulting in 552 documents involving Q. saponaria and 26 for Q. lancifolia. The country with the highest number of publications on Q. saponaria is the United States, followed by Chile, where the species occurs. With regard to Q. lancifolia, Brazil leads with the highest number of publications, followed by Uruguay. Saponins are the most extensively studied compounds produced by both species, exhibiting various types with different constituents and applications. The bark of Q. saponaria (92%) and the leaves of Q. lancifolia (84%) have been studied the most. The field of health sciences comprises the largest number of publications on both species, which have applications as vaccine adjuvants. However, a gap was identified in the realm of ecological studies, considering the potential of these species for restoring degraded areas. Hence, there is a need to expand silvicultural and conservation research, particularly given the strong demand for saponin production. Additionally, efforts to diversify techniques for sustainable exploitation should be encouraged to ensure the conservation of these species.
期刊介绍:
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology).
In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.