Utilidad del PCR múltiplex de hemocultivo para el diagnóstico microbiológico de infecciones nosocomiales del sistema nervioso central en pacientes críticos

Sofía Mauro , Federico Verga , Antonio Galiana , Mariela Vieytes , Marcelo Barbato
{"title":"Utilidad del PCR múltiplex de hemocultivo para el diagnóstico microbiológico de infecciones nosocomiales del sistema nervioso central en pacientes críticos","authors":"Sofía Mauro ,&nbsp;Federico Verga ,&nbsp;Antonio Galiana ,&nbsp;Mariela Vieytes ,&nbsp;Marcelo Barbato","doi":"10.1016/j.acci.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>To determine the usefulness of a molecular biology technique for nucleic acid amplification using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) originally designed for microbiological diagnosis in blood cultures, when applied to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Retrospective, observational, single-center study, carried out between January 2017 and February 2024 in a 28-bed multipurpose critical care unit. All patients with suspected postneurosurgical infection and CSF cytochemical alterations were included. In addition to the microbiological study of the CSF by traditional methods, the BioFire® Blood Culture Identification<!--> <!-->2 (BCID) panel was applied directly to CSF samples. Traditional culture methods were considered as the reference standard for microbiological identification. The main variable of interest was the percentage of concordance of microbial identification between traditional cultures and BCID.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>29 patients were included. The diagnosis of central nervous system infection was confirmed in 14 cases (48.2%), 7 post-neurosurgical meningitis, 6 infections associated with ventriculostomy and 1<!--> <!-->subdural empyema. The most frequently found microorganisms were <em>Acinetobacter baumannii</em> and <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em>. No discordances were found between PCR and cultures, so both the positive (14/14) and negative identification concordance (15/15) were 100% between both methods.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients with suspected post-neurosurgical infection and compatible CSF alterations, multiplex PCR blood cultures applied directly to CSF samples could be considered a useful and accurate tool for rapid microbiological diagnosis in infections of the central nervous system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100016,"journal":{"name":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","volume":"24 4","pages":"Pages 379-386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0122726224000740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

To determine the usefulness of a molecular biology technique for nucleic acid amplification using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) originally designed for microbiological diagnosis in blood cultures, when applied to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples.

Materials and methods

Retrospective, observational, single-center study, carried out between January 2017 and February 2024 in a 28-bed multipurpose critical care unit. All patients with suspected postneurosurgical infection and CSF cytochemical alterations were included. In addition to the microbiological study of the CSF by traditional methods, the BioFire® Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID) panel was applied directly to CSF samples. Traditional culture methods were considered as the reference standard for microbiological identification. The main variable of interest was the percentage of concordance of microbial identification between traditional cultures and BCID.

Results

29 patients were included. The diagnosis of central nervous system infection was confirmed in 14 cases (48.2%), 7 post-neurosurgical meningitis, 6 infections associated with ventriculostomy and 1 subdural empyema. The most frequently found microorganisms were Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae. No discordances were found between PCR and cultures, so both the positive (14/14) and negative identification concordance (15/15) were 100% between both methods.

Conclusions

In patients with suspected post-neurosurgical infection and compatible CSF alterations, multiplex PCR blood cultures applied directly to CSF samples could be considered a useful and accurate tool for rapid microbiological diagnosis in infections of the central nervous system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血液培养多重 PCR 在重症患者中枢神经系统院内感染的微生物学诊断中的实用性。
背景和目的确定使用实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)进行核酸扩增的分子生物学技术在脑脊液(CSF)样本中的实用性。材料和方法2017 年 1 月至 2024 年 2 月期间,在一家拥有 28 张床位的多功能重症监护病房开展了一项回顾性、观察性、单中心研究。纳入了所有疑似神经外科术后感染和 CSF 细胞化学改变的患者。除了用传统方法对 CSF 进行微生物学研究外,BioFire® 血液培养鉴定 2(BCID)面板也直接应用于 CSF 样本。传统的培养方法被视为微生物鉴定的参考标准。研究的主要变量是传统培养方法与 BCID 微生物鉴定的一致性百分比。其中 14 例(48.2%)确诊为中枢神经系统感染,7 例为神经外科手术后脑膜炎,6 例为脑室造口术相关感染,1 例为硬膜下积液。最常发现的微生物是鲍曼不动杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌。结论 对于疑似神经外科手术后感染并伴有脑脊液改变的患者,直接对脑脊液样本进行多重 PCR 血培养可被视为中枢神经系统感染微生物快速诊断的有用而准确的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Desnutrición carencial al ingreso en pacientes intervenidos quirúrgicamente sobre el tubo digestivo Parálisis hipopotasémica familiar: reporte de caso Asociación de antidepresivos y la reducción de intubación orotraqueal o muerte en los pacientes con COVID-19 Síndrome de distrés respiratorio agudo por Plasmodium vivax con coinfección de tuberculosis pulmonar en época de pandemia por covid-19. Reporte de caso Reacción de hipersensibilidad tardía asociada a la picadura de medusa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1