Historique du syndrome de Capgras – est-il une forme naturelle ?

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Annales medico-psychologiques Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amp.2024.07.009
Jean-Pierre Luauté
{"title":"Historique du syndrome de Capgras – est-il une forme naturelle ?","authors":"Jean-Pierre Luauté","doi":"10.1016/j.amp.2024.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Joseph Capgras (1873–1950) and his pupils described between 1923 and 1924 the 3 first cases of a phenomenon that they called “Illusion des sosies” and quickly designated as Capgras’ syndrome (CS). The 1923 princeps case defined the phenomenon as coming from the impossibility for the patient to have access to the identity of a person and, because the resemblance was preserved, to declare that she dealt with a “sosie” (a double). The explanation was limited to the conjecture that there existed a different emotional factor between the memory image and the actual perception. The 2 following cases were more oriented towards the, then booming, psychodynamic explanations which lead in case 3, where the aetiology was organic, to misunderstand its interest. Afterwards, the syndrome which has been early known in the UK, its second chosen homeland will be the object, from psychologists specialists of face recognition studies, of unitarian explanations in the frame of a Cognitive neuropsychiatry. This approach is challenged in the name of a discontinuity between psychiatric and organic cases by supporters of a “regional epistemology” peculiar to psychiatry. A reflection about terminology concludes, in agreement with the concept of syndrome, that CS is both a natural and a practical kind.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7992,"journal":{"name":"Annales medico-psychologiques","volume":"182 9","pages":"Pages 855-861"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales medico-psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003448724002312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Joseph Capgras (1873–1950) and his pupils described between 1923 and 1924 the 3 first cases of a phenomenon that they called “Illusion des sosies” and quickly designated as Capgras’ syndrome (CS). The 1923 princeps case defined the phenomenon as coming from the impossibility for the patient to have access to the identity of a person and, because the resemblance was preserved, to declare that she dealt with a “sosie” (a double). The explanation was limited to the conjecture that there existed a different emotional factor between the memory image and the actual perception. The 2 following cases were more oriented towards the, then booming, psychodynamic explanations which lead in case 3, where the aetiology was organic, to misunderstand its interest. Afterwards, the syndrome which has been early known in the UK, its second chosen homeland will be the object, from psychologists specialists of face recognition studies, of unitarian explanations in the frame of a Cognitive neuropsychiatry. This approach is challenged in the name of a discontinuity between psychiatric and organic cases by supporters of a “regional epistemology” peculiar to psychiatry. A reflection about terminology concludes, in agreement with the concept of syndrome, that CS is both a natural and a practical kind.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡普格拉斯综合征的历史--它是自然形成的吗?
约瑟夫-卡普格拉斯(Joseph Capgras,1873-1950 年)和他的学生们在 1923 至 1924 年间首次描述了 3 个病例,他们将这种现象称为 "幻视"(Illusion des sosies),并很快将其命名为 "卡普格拉斯综合症"(Capgras's Syndrome,CS)。1923 年的第一例病例将这一现象定义为:患者无法获得一个人的身份,并且由于相似性得以保留,因此无法宣称她面对的是一个 "sosie"(替身)。这种解释仅限于一种猜测,即记忆中的形象和实际感知之间存在着不同的情感因素。接下来的两个病例更倾向于当时流行的心理动力学解释,这导致病例 3(病因是器质性的)误解了它的意义。之后,这种综合症在其第二故乡英国很早就为人所知,它将成为人脸识别研究方面的心理学家在认知神经精神病学的框架内进行单一解释的对象。精神病学特有的 "区域认识论 "的支持者以精神病和器质性病例之间的不连续性为名,对这种方法提出了质疑。通过对术语的反思,我们得出结论,CS既是一种自然的概念,也是一种实用的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annales medico-psychologiques
Annales medico-psychologiques 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annales Médico-Psychologiques is a peer-reviewed medical journal covering the field of psychiatry. Articles are published in French or in English. The journal was established in 1843 and is published by Elsevier on behalf of the Société Médico-Psychologique. The journal publishes 10 times a year original articles covering biological, genetic, psychological, forensic and cultural issues relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness, as well as peer reviewed articles that have been presented and discussed during meetings of the Société Médico-Psychologique.To report on the major currents of thought of contemporary psychiatry, and to publish clinical and biological research of international standard, these are the aims of the Annales Médico-Psychologiques.
期刊最新文献
Introduction editorial board Evaluating STC-1 and STC-2 mRNA expressions in Schizophrenia patients with increased oxidative stress Le délire est-il un récit ? Une approche narrative de la psychose Effect of taxifolin on clozapine-induced experimental oxidative and inflammatory heart damage in rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1