Experimental study of shaking table for reinforced soil retaining walls: Analysis of tiered configuration effects

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109076
Boyuan Cai , Xiaoguang Cai , Sihan Li , Xin Huang , Yan Zhang , Chengzhi Xiao
{"title":"Experimental study of shaking table for reinforced soil retaining walls: Analysis of tiered configuration effects","authors":"Boyuan Cai ,&nbsp;Xiaoguang Cai ,&nbsp;Sihan Li ,&nbsp;Xin Huang ,&nbsp;Yan Zhang ,&nbsp;Chengzhi Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Deciding on the inclusion of tiers and determining the optimal number of tiers are critical considerations in the design of reinforced soil retaining walls (RSRWs). In this study, the mechanical properties of RSRWs under seismic loading are discussed in depth, with special attention paid to the influence of tiered configuration effects on the seismic performance of RSRWs. The response characteristics of these structures under seismic loading were comparatively analyzed by conducting shaking table tests of single-tiered, two-tiered, and three-tiered modular geogrid RSRWs. The results show that localized modular misalignment mainly occurs at the top of the retaining walls of all tiers, and reasonable tiered design can enhance the stability, but too many tiers may instead reduce the structural stability. The tiered reinforced soil retaining walls (TRSRWs) exhibit higher natural frequencies and damping ratios, which increase with more tiers, and the natural frequencies and damping ratios of the upper-tiered walls are always higher than those of the lower-tiered walls. The acceleration amplification effect is more significant in the upper part of the retaining wall structure, and the tiered design can reduce the acceleration amplification effect to a certain extent, but the increase in the number of tiers does not have much effect on this. The horizontal displacement of the TRSRWs shows the distribution of “upper large and lower small”, and the two-tiered retaining wall effectively reduces the horizontal displacement of the wall facing, whereas the three-tiered retaining wall does not have a significant improvement effect. The tiered design significantly optimizes the settlement of the retaining walls, and the number of tiers has little effect on the settlement improvement. The seismic active soil pressure increased with the peak ground acceleration and loading frequency, and the tiered design changed its distribution, and the increase in the number of tiers helped to further reduce the soil pressure. The increment of reinforcement strain in TRSRWs was lower than that in single-tiered retaining walls, and the tiered design effectively reduced the reinforcement stress, but the number of tiers had a limited effect on the improvement of this effect. The upper part of the wall in the un-tiered design is prone to overall tilt and horizontal expansion, and the deformation of the upper-tiered walls of the TRSRWs is all in a composite deformation mode, while the lowest-tiered walls are in a single deformation mode. The tiered design has a positive effect in limiting the development of potential failure surfaces in the substructure, resulting in improved stability of the substructure. The results of the study can provide a reference for the design selection of RSRWs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 109076"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726124006286","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deciding on the inclusion of tiers and determining the optimal number of tiers are critical considerations in the design of reinforced soil retaining walls (RSRWs). In this study, the mechanical properties of RSRWs under seismic loading are discussed in depth, with special attention paid to the influence of tiered configuration effects on the seismic performance of RSRWs. The response characteristics of these structures under seismic loading were comparatively analyzed by conducting shaking table tests of single-tiered, two-tiered, and three-tiered modular geogrid RSRWs. The results show that localized modular misalignment mainly occurs at the top of the retaining walls of all tiers, and reasonable tiered design can enhance the stability, but too many tiers may instead reduce the structural stability. The tiered reinforced soil retaining walls (TRSRWs) exhibit higher natural frequencies and damping ratios, which increase with more tiers, and the natural frequencies and damping ratios of the upper-tiered walls are always higher than those of the lower-tiered walls. The acceleration amplification effect is more significant in the upper part of the retaining wall structure, and the tiered design can reduce the acceleration amplification effect to a certain extent, but the increase in the number of tiers does not have much effect on this. The horizontal displacement of the TRSRWs shows the distribution of “upper large and lower small”, and the two-tiered retaining wall effectively reduces the horizontal displacement of the wall facing, whereas the three-tiered retaining wall does not have a significant improvement effect. The tiered design significantly optimizes the settlement of the retaining walls, and the number of tiers has little effect on the settlement improvement. The seismic active soil pressure increased with the peak ground acceleration and loading frequency, and the tiered design changed its distribution, and the increase in the number of tiers helped to further reduce the soil pressure. The increment of reinforcement strain in TRSRWs was lower than that in single-tiered retaining walls, and the tiered design effectively reduced the reinforcement stress, but the number of tiers had a limited effect on the improvement of this effect. The upper part of the wall in the un-tiered design is prone to overall tilt and horizontal expansion, and the deformation of the upper-tiered walls of the TRSRWs is all in a composite deformation mode, while the lowest-tiered walls are in a single deformation mode. The tiered design has a positive effect in limiting the development of potential failure surfaces in the substructure, resulting in improved stability of the substructure. The results of the study can provide a reference for the design selection of RSRWs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加筋土挡土墙振动台试验研究:分层配置效应分析
在加筋土挡土墙(RSRW)的设计中,决定是否包含分层以及确定最佳分层数是至关重要的考虑因素。本研究深入探讨了 RSRW 在地震荷载作用下的力学性能,特别关注了分层配置效应对 RSRW 抗震性能的影响。通过对单层、两层和三层模块化土工格栅 RSRW 进行振动台试验,比较分析了这些结构在地震荷载下的响应特性。结果表明,局部模块错位主要发生在各层挡土墙的顶部,合理的分层设计可以增强稳定性,但分层过多反而会降低结构稳定性。分层加筋土挡土墙表现出较高的固有频率和阻尼比,且随着层数的增加而增大,上层挡土墙的固有频率和阻尼比总是高于下层挡土墙。挡土墙结构上部的加速度放大效应比较明显,分层设计可以在一定程度上降低加速度放大效应,但层数的增加对此影响不大。TRSRW 的水平位移呈现 "上大下小 "的分布,两层挡土墙能有效减小墙面的水平位移,而三层挡土墙的改善效果并不明显。分层设计明显优化了挡土墙的沉降,层数对沉降改善影响不大。地震作用土压力随峰值地加速度和加载频率的增加而增大,分层设计改变了其分布,层数的增加有助于进一步减小土压力。TRSRW 的钢筋应变增量低于单层挡土墙,分层设计有效降低了钢筋应力,但层数对这一效果的改善作用有限。未分层设计的墙体上部容易发生整体倾斜和水平膨胀,TRSRW 上层墙体的变形均为复合变形模式,而最低层墙体为单一变形模式。分层设计对限制下部结构潜在破坏面的发展具有积极作用,从而提高了下部结构的稳定性。研究结果可为 RSRW 的设计选择提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic response analysis of monopile-supported offshore wind turbine on sandy ground under seismic and environmental loads Quantification of energy-dissipating capacity for self-centering shear walls considering variable loading sequences Combining physical model with neural networks for earthquake site response prediction Simplified design approach of a negative stiffness-based seismic base absorber via multi-objective optimization Optimal design and numerical studies of negative stiffness device–TMD controlled systems using PSO algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1