{"title":"Energy absorption characteristics and auxetic effect of novel elliptic-arc re-entrant honeycomb structures","authors":"Tang Yuxin , Zhong Yifeng , Zhu Yilin , Liu Rong","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The novel elliptical-arc re-entrant honeycomb (ERH) is designed by substituting the straight inclined struts within the re-entrant honeycomb with elliptical-arc struts. To assess its performance effectively, the study established the 3D equivalent Cauchy model (3D-ECM) and 2D equivalent Kirchhoff–Love model (2D-EKM) using the variational asymptotic method. The equivalent properties derived from the unit-cell constitutive model were integrated into the equivalent models for macroscopic analysis. Through 3D printing experiments and numerical simulations, the model’s accuracy in predicting the compression behaviors and auxetic effects of various uni- and multi-cellular ERHs under uniaxial compression, as well as the three-point bending behaviors of ERH panels were confirmed. In addition, this model substantially simplifies the modeling process, leading to a 8-fold increase in computational efficiency. Parametric analyses demonstrated that the ERH structure can uphold a beneficial auxetic effect while achieving lightweight and high strength characteristics when the axial ratio of the ellipse equals 1.25. Furthermore, ERH structures outperform arc-shaped re-entrant and regular re-entrant honeycombs in energy absorption and specific energy absorption capacity. These findings offer valuable insights for the preliminary design and optimization of ERH structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 119260"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029624018224","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The novel elliptical-arc re-entrant honeycomb (ERH) is designed by substituting the straight inclined struts within the re-entrant honeycomb with elliptical-arc struts. To assess its performance effectively, the study established the 3D equivalent Cauchy model (3D-ECM) and 2D equivalent Kirchhoff–Love model (2D-EKM) using the variational asymptotic method. The equivalent properties derived from the unit-cell constitutive model were integrated into the equivalent models for macroscopic analysis. Through 3D printing experiments and numerical simulations, the model’s accuracy in predicting the compression behaviors and auxetic effects of various uni- and multi-cellular ERHs under uniaxial compression, as well as the three-point bending behaviors of ERH panels were confirmed. In addition, this model substantially simplifies the modeling process, leading to a 8-fold increase in computational efficiency. Parametric analyses demonstrated that the ERH structure can uphold a beneficial auxetic effect while achieving lightweight and high strength characteristics when the axial ratio of the ellipse equals 1.25. Furthermore, ERH structures outperform arc-shaped re-entrant and regular re-entrant honeycombs in energy absorption and specific energy absorption capacity. These findings offer valuable insights for the preliminary design and optimization of ERH structures.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.