Resilience in maritime logistics: Theoretical framework, research methodology, and indicator system

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY Ocean & Coastal Management Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107465
Kevin X. Li , Hao Wang , Yang Yang , Mengchi Li
{"title":"Resilience in maritime logistics: Theoretical framework, research methodology, and indicator system","authors":"Kevin X. Li ,&nbsp;Hao Wang ,&nbsp;Yang Yang ,&nbsp;Mengchi Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Maritime logistics, essential for global trade, faces increasing vulnerability due to operational complexity and disruptions such as extreme weather, geopolitical conflicts, and pandemics. Although maritime logistics resilience (MLR) has garnered growing attention, the field still lacks a unified theoretical framework and standardized evaluation indicator system, exposing a significant research gap. This study seeks to fill this gap by conducting a systematic review of 163 papers from Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, covering the period from 2009 to August 2023. The study defines maritime logistics resilience, identifies its four key attributes—robustness, vulnerability, redundancy, and rapidity—and explores their interrelationships, establishing a theoretical framework. Based on this foundation, an innovative evaluation indicator system is proposed for the first time, designed to assess resilience across the three main clusters of the maritime logistics system: ports, shipping networks, and the maritime supply chain. The proposed framework and indicator system provide a novel, comprehensive approach to evaluating MLR, offering both theoretical contributions and practical tools for industry practitioners. This research fills a critical gap in the field and lays the groundwork for future empirical studies and policy development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"259 ","pages":"Article 107465"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569124004502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maritime logistics, essential for global trade, faces increasing vulnerability due to operational complexity and disruptions such as extreme weather, geopolitical conflicts, and pandemics. Although maritime logistics resilience (MLR) has garnered growing attention, the field still lacks a unified theoretical framework and standardized evaluation indicator system, exposing a significant research gap. This study seeks to fill this gap by conducting a systematic review of 163 papers from Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, covering the period from 2009 to August 2023. The study defines maritime logistics resilience, identifies its four key attributes—robustness, vulnerability, redundancy, and rapidity—and explores their interrelationships, establishing a theoretical framework. Based on this foundation, an innovative evaluation indicator system is proposed for the first time, designed to assess resilience across the three main clusters of the maritime logistics system: ports, shipping networks, and the maritime supply chain. The proposed framework and indicator system provide a novel, comprehensive approach to evaluating MLR, offering both theoretical contributions and practical tools for industry practitioners. This research fills a critical gap in the field and lays the groundwork for future empirical studies and policy development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海运物流的复原力:理论框架、研究方法和指标体系
海运物流对全球贸易至关重要,但由于操作的复杂性以及极端天气、地缘政治冲突和大流行病等干扰因素,海运物流面临着越来越大的脆弱性。尽管海运物流复原力(MLR)已获得越来越多的关注,但该领域仍然缺乏统一的理论框架和标准化的评估指标体系,暴露出巨大的研究空白。本研究试图通过对 Scopus、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 的 163 篇论文进行系统综述来填补这一空白,时间跨度为 2009 年至 2023 年 8 月。本研究对海运物流复原力进行了定义,确定了其四个关键属性--稳健性、脆弱性、冗余性和快速性,并探讨了它们之间的相互关系,从而建立了一个理论框架。在此基础上,首次提出了一个创新的评估指标体系,旨在对海运物流系统的三大集群(港口、航运网络和海运供应链)进行复原力评估。建议的框架和指标体系为评估多式联运提供了一种新颖、全面的方法,为行业从业人员提供了理论贡献和实用工具。这项研究填补了该领域的一个重要空白,为未来的实证研究和政策制定奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Predicting the cumulative effects of multiple stressors on shellfish ecosystem service potential Decomposition of driving factors of carbon emissions and carbon sinks from marine fishery production in China Robust integrated multi-mode scheduling of flexible loading and unloading operations with maintenance services in a port container terminal The interaction between climate change and marine fisheries: Review, challenges, and gaps Participatory mapping of uses and ecosystem services as a useful tool for the identification of conflicts in Marine Protected Areas: The case of the Cíes Islands archipelago (NW Spain)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1