Simulation-free magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy of prostate cancer

Cora Warda , Cihan Gani , Simon Boeke , David Mönnich , Moritz Schneider , Maximilian Niyazi , Daniela Thorwarth
{"title":"Simulation-free magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy of prostate cancer","authors":"Cora Warda ,&nbsp;Cihan Gani ,&nbsp;Simon Boeke ,&nbsp;David Mönnich ,&nbsp;Moritz Schneider ,&nbsp;Maximilian Niyazi ,&nbsp;Daniela Thorwarth","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Despite recent advances of online image-guided high-precision patient positioning and adaptation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or cone-beam computed tomography (CT), standard radiation therapy pathway still involves a dedicated simulation scan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and planning quality of integrating a simulation-free treatment planning workflow for adaptive online MRI-guided radiation therapy on a 1.5 T MRI linear accelerator (MRI-Linac) in prostate cancer using diagnostic CT (dCT) scans.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>For ten patients with prostate cancer previously treated at the MRI-Linac with adaptive radiation therapy (42.7 Gy in 7 fractions), simulation-free reference plans based on dCT were retrospectively created, and adaptive plans were simulated for the first treatment fraction. Reference and adapted plans derived from both standard and simulation-free workflows were compared with regard to institutional dose/volume criteria, followed by statistical assessment using the paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a Bonferroni-corrected significance level of α = 0.025.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Simulation-free reference and adapted plans consistently met dose/volume criteria. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between both workflows, except median values for near-maximum dose (D2%) in the planning target volume: 44.2 Gy (standard) vs. 44.5 Gy (simulation-free) in reference plans (p = 0.01), and 44.5 Gy vs. 44.6 Gy in adapted plans (p = 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrated the feasibility of simulation-free radiation therapy planning using dCT. Comparable treatment plan quality was observed for both reference and adapted radiation therapy plans in a curative setting for patients with prostate cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100667"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Despite recent advances of online image-guided high-precision patient positioning and adaptation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or cone-beam computed tomography (CT), standard radiation therapy pathway still involves a dedicated simulation scan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and planning quality of integrating a simulation-free treatment planning workflow for adaptive online MRI-guided radiation therapy on a 1.5 T MRI linear accelerator (MRI-Linac) in prostate cancer using diagnostic CT (dCT) scans.

Materials and methods

For ten patients with prostate cancer previously treated at the MRI-Linac with adaptive radiation therapy (42.7 Gy in 7 fractions), simulation-free reference plans based on dCT were retrospectively created, and adaptive plans were simulated for the first treatment fraction. Reference and adapted plans derived from both standard and simulation-free workflows were compared with regard to institutional dose/volume criteria, followed by statistical assessment using the paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a Bonferroni-corrected significance level of α = 0.025.

Results

Simulation-free reference and adapted plans consistently met dose/volume criteria. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between both workflows, except median values for near-maximum dose (D2%) in the planning target volume: 44.2 Gy (standard) vs. 44.5 Gy (simulation-free) in reference plans (p = 0.01), and 44.5 Gy vs. 44.6 Gy in adapted plans (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the feasibility of simulation-free radiation therapy planning using dCT. Comparable treatment plan quality was observed for both reference and adapted radiation therapy plans in a curative setting for patients with prostate cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺癌的无模拟磁共振引导放射治疗
背景和目的尽管最近在使用磁共振成像(MRI)或锥束计算机断层扫描(CT)进行在线图像引导高精度患者定位和适应性治疗方面取得了进展,但标准的放射治疗路径仍然需要进行专门的模拟扫描。本研究的目的是评估在 1.5 T MRI 直线加速器(MRI-Linac)上使用诊断 CT(dCT)扫描对前列腺癌患者进行自适应在线 MRI 引导放疗时,整合无模拟治疗计划工作流程的可行性和计划质量。材料和方法对于之前在 MRI-Linac 接受自适应放疗(42.7 Gy,分 7 次治疗)的 10 名前列腺癌患者,回顾性地创建了基于 dCT 的免模拟参考计划,并模拟了第一个治疗部分的自适应计划。将标准工作流程和无模拟工作流程得出的参考计划和适应计划与机构剂量/体积标准进行比较,然后使用配对 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行统计评估,Bonferroni 校正显著性水平为 α = 0.025。结果无模拟参考计划和适应计划始终符合剂量/体积标准。统计分析表明,除了计划目标容积中的近最大剂量(D2%)的中位值:参考计划为 44.2 Gy(标准)对 44.5 Gy(无模拟)(p = 0.01),适应计划为 44.5 Gy 对 44.6 Gy(p = 0.01)之外,两种工作流程之间无明显差异。在对前列腺癌患者进行根治性治疗时,可观察到参考放疗计划和调整放疗计划的治疗质量相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of artificial intelligence-based autosegmentation for a high-performance cone-beam computed tomography imaging system in the pelvic region Translation of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging onto a magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator in patients with head and neck cancer Normal tissue complication probability model for severe radiation-induced lymphopenia in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy Recommendations for reporting and evaluating proton therapy beyond dose and constant relative biological effectiveness Investigating the potential of diffusion tensor atlases to generate anisotropic clinical tumor volumes in glioblastoma patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1