Finite element analysis and its application in Orthopaedics: A narrative review

Aman Verma , Aakash Jain , Siddharth Sekhar Sethy , Vishal Verma , Nikhil Goyal , Madhubari Vathulya , Pankaj Kandwal
{"title":"Finite element analysis and its application in Orthopaedics: A narrative review","authors":"Aman Verma ,&nbsp;Aakash Jain ,&nbsp;Siddharth Sekhar Sethy ,&nbsp;Vishal Verma ,&nbsp;Nikhil Goyal ,&nbsp;Madhubari Vathulya ,&nbsp;Pankaj Kandwal","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Orthopedic surgery and traumatology necessitate cost-effective approaches that can be replicated across multiple venues. Finite Element (FE) simulation models have evolved as a solution, allowing for consistent investigations into biomechanical systems. Finite Element Analysis (FEA), which began in the 1950s aviation industry, has since expanded into orthopedics. Its progress, fueled by improved computing, has a significant impact on orthopedic surgery, helping to understand biomechanics and post-implantation responses. The use of FEA has increased in recent decades, demonstrating its critical importance in modern orthopedic research. Methodologies for FEA include both generic and patient-specific approaches, each customized to individual needs. FEA goes through three stages: preprocessing, solution, and postprocessing, all of which require exact material property assignment and boundary conditions. Pathophysiology, orthopedic biomechanics, implant design, fracture fixation, bracing, and preoperative planning are all applications of FEA, which has revolutionized surgical methods. However, FEA has drawbacks such as oversimplification, processing needs, and validation issues. Future FEA advances aim to improve model accuracy, add active muscle simulation, and standardize procedures, resulting in significant advancements in orthopedic research and treatment planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 102803"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566224004727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orthopedic surgery and traumatology necessitate cost-effective approaches that can be replicated across multiple venues. Finite Element (FE) simulation models have evolved as a solution, allowing for consistent investigations into biomechanical systems. Finite Element Analysis (FEA), which began in the 1950s aviation industry, has since expanded into orthopedics. Its progress, fueled by improved computing, has a significant impact on orthopedic surgery, helping to understand biomechanics and post-implantation responses. The use of FEA has increased in recent decades, demonstrating its critical importance in modern orthopedic research. Methodologies for FEA include both generic and patient-specific approaches, each customized to individual needs. FEA goes through three stages: preprocessing, solution, and postprocessing, all of which require exact material property assignment and boundary conditions. Pathophysiology, orthopedic biomechanics, implant design, fracture fixation, bracing, and preoperative planning are all applications of FEA, which has revolutionized surgical methods. However, FEA has drawbacks such as oversimplification, processing needs, and validation issues. Future FEA advances aim to improve model accuracy, add active muscle simulation, and standardize procedures, resulting in significant advancements in orthopedic research and treatment planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有限元分析及其在矫形外科中的应用:综述
矫形外科和创伤学需要成本效益高、可在多个场所复制的方法。有限元(FE)模拟模型已发展成为一种解决方案,可以对生物力学系统进行一致的研究。有限元分析(FEA)始于 20 世纪 50 年代的航空业,现已扩展到骨科领域。计算能力的提高推动了有限元分析的发展,对整形外科产生了重大影响,有助于了解生物力学和植入后的反应。近几十年来,有限元分析的使用越来越多,这表明它在现代骨科研究中至关重要。有限元分析方法包括通用方法和针对特定患者的方法,每种方法都是根据个人需求定制的。有限元分析需要经历三个阶段:预处理、求解和后处理,所有这些阶段都需要精确的材料属性分配和边界条件。病理生理学、整形外科生物力学、植入物设计、骨折固定、支撑和术前规划都是有限元分析的应用领域,它彻底改变了外科手术方法。然而,有限元分析也有缺点,如过于简化、需要处理和验证问题。未来有限元分析的发展目标是提高模型精度、增加主动肌肉模拟和标准化程序,从而在骨科研究和治疗规划方面取得重大进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.
期刊最新文献
Biologic Augmented Scaffold-based cartilage repair: Addressing Complications and Enhancing Outcomes. Managing the arthritic wrist: Complication prevention and management. Challenges and complications in arthroscopic ankle ligament repair: Current concepts. AI in scientific publishing: Revolutionizing research with caution. Letter to editor: Sathyendra et al. Comparative study of local injections of autologous platelet rich plasma versus corticosteroid in management of chronic plantar fasciitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1