Mosbeh R. Kaloop , Abidhan Bardhan , Pijush Samui , Jong Wan Hu , Mohamed Elsharawy
{"title":"Comparative study on deep and machine learning approaches for predicting wind pressures on tall buildings","authors":"Mosbeh R. Kaloop , Abidhan Bardhan , Pijush Samui , Jong Wan Hu , Mohamed Elsharawy","doi":"10.1016/j.aej.2024.10.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wind-structures interaction has been extensively examined in the last few decades using field measurements, full scale measurements and wind tunnel testing. These experimental approaches are considered costly and time consuming. The need for a reliable analytical approach that can be used for examining wind-effects on buildings is clear. Although Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is one of the other alternative numerical options yet might not reached the level of confidence to be reliably used to finalize the structural design. On the other hand, a limited number of studies have been carried out using soft computing methods to examine wind-induced loads on structures. However, its promising results, more work is still required towards achieving the full analytical prediction of wind effects on structures. This study investigates the use of different soft-computing techniques in predicting wind pressures on tall buildings. Two deep learning methods viz deep belief network (DBN) and deep neural network (DNN), and five machine learning methods namely feedforward neural network, extreme learning machine, weighted extreme learning machine, random forest, and gradient boosting machine were evaluated, and compared in predicting the design wind pressures on tall buildings. Wind tunnel datasets, used in the current study to develop the proposed computing models, were collected from testing three tall buildings having the same full-scale horizontal dimensions of (40 m and 80 m) and different heights of (80 m, 120 m and 160 m). The buildings were tested at a scale of 1:400 in urban terrain exposure. Mean and fluctuating wind pressure coefficients on the building with the height of 120 m are herein predicted using the seven computing methods and the results were compared to the corresponding measured pressures. Overall, the examined methods performed well in the wind pressure prediction process. Furthermore, the employed DNN was found to have the best performance in predicting mean and fluctuating wind pressures with the highest correlation coefficients. Hence, the DNN was also used in predicting the mean and fluctuating wind pressures on the two other buildings with heights of 80 m and 160 m. Experimental results indicate that the employed DNN model can be effectively used in predicting wind-induced pressures on tall buildings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7484,"journal":{"name":"alexandria engineering journal","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 610-627"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"alexandria engineering journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111001682401202X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Wind-structures interaction has been extensively examined in the last few decades using field measurements, full scale measurements and wind tunnel testing. These experimental approaches are considered costly and time consuming. The need for a reliable analytical approach that can be used for examining wind-effects on buildings is clear. Although Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is one of the other alternative numerical options yet might not reached the level of confidence to be reliably used to finalize the structural design. On the other hand, a limited number of studies have been carried out using soft computing methods to examine wind-induced loads on structures. However, its promising results, more work is still required towards achieving the full analytical prediction of wind effects on structures. This study investigates the use of different soft-computing techniques in predicting wind pressures on tall buildings. Two deep learning methods viz deep belief network (DBN) and deep neural network (DNN), and five machine learning methods namely feedforward neural network, extreme learning machine, weighted extreme learning machine, random forest, and gradient boosting machine were evaluated, and compared in predicting the design wind pressures on tall buildings. Wind tunnel datasets, used in the current study to develop the proposed computing models, were collected from testing three tall buildings having the same full-scale horizontal dimensions of (40 m and 80 m) and different heights of (80 m, 120 m and 160 m). The buildings were tested at a scale of 1:400 in urban terrain exposure. Mean and fluctuating wind pressure coefficients on the building with the height of 120 m are herein predicted using the seven computing methods and the results were compared to the corresponding measured pressures. Overall, the examined methods performed well in the wind pressure prediction process. Furthermore, the employed DNN was found to have the best performance in predicting mean and fluctuating wind pressures with the highest correlation coefficients. Hence, the DNN was also used in predicting the mean and fluctuating wind pressures on the two other buildings with heights of 80 m and 160 m. Experimental results indicate that the employed DNN model can be effectively used in predicting wind-induced pressures on tall buildings.
期刊介绍:
Alexandria Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publishing high quality papers in the field of engineering and applied science. Alexandria Engineering Journal is cited in the Engineering Information Services (EIS) and the Chemical Abstracts (CA). The papers published in Alexandria Engineering Journal are grouped into five sections, according to the following classification:
• Mechanical, Production, Marine and Textile Engineering
• Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Nuclear Engineering
• Civil and Architecture Engineering
• Chemical Engineering and Applied Sciences
• Environmental Engineering