Comparison of the performance of local skin temperatures in evaluating overall thermal comfort at normal room temperatures

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Building and Environment Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112296
Siyi Li , Jun Xu , Weiwei Liu , Zhiliang Wang
{"title":"Comparison of the performance of local skin temperatures in evaluating overall thermal comfort at normal room temperatures","authors":"Siyi Li ,&nbsp;Jun Xu ,&nbsp;Weiwei Liu ,&nbsp;Zhiliang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Local skin temperature is considered to be a potential physiological parameter for thermal comfort evaluation. However, which parts are more suitable for thermal comfort evaluation still needs further investigation. In this study, 20 seated subjects were recruited for thermal comfort and skin temperature monitoring experiments conducted in a climate chamber during winter and summer. The experimental temperatures in winter and summer were 12 °C–24 °C and 24 °C–32 °C, respectively. Thermal comfort evaluation models were developed for the local skin temperature of eight parts via the Fisher discriminant analysis. The performance of the developed models was evaluated using precision and false negative rate (FNR). The results indicated that the skin temperatures of the back of the left hand, left wrist, and left forearm had higher precision for thermal comfort evaluation than those of other parts, whereas the FNR was lower than in the other parts, which were suitable for thermal comfort evaluation. The skin temperature of the left chest had the lowest precision and the highest FNR, making it unsuitable for thermal comfort evaluation. By reasonably selecting body parts, the use of single-point skin temperature to evaluate thermal comfort was better than the use of the mean skin temperature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"267 ","pages":"Article 112296"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132324011387","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Local skin temperature is considered to be a potential physiological parameter for thermal comfort evaluation. However, which parts are more suitable for thermal comfort evaluation still needs further investigation. In this study, 20 seated subjects were recruited for thermal comfort and skin temperature monitoring experiments conducted in a climate chamber during winter and summer. The experimental temperatures in winter and summer were 12 °C–24 °C and 24 °C–32 °C, respectively. Thermal comfort evaluation models were developed for the local skin temperature of eight parts via the Fisher discriminant analysis. The performance of the developed models was evaluated using precision and false negative rate (FNR). The results indicated that the skin temperatures of the back of the left hand, left wrist, and left forearm had higher precision for thermal comfort evaluation than those of other parts, whereas the FNR was lower than in the other parts, which were suitable for thermal comfort evaluation. The skin temperature of the left chest had the lowest precision and the highest FNR, making it unsuitable for thermal comfort evaluation. By reasonably selecting body parts, the use of single-point skin temperature to evaluate thermal comfort was better than the use of the mean skin temperature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较局部皮肤温度在评估正常室温下整体热舒适度方面的性能
局部皮肤温度被认为是热舒适度评估的潜在生理参数。然而,哪些部位更适合用于热舒适度评估仍需进一步研究。本研究招募了 20 名坐位受试者,在气候箱中进行冬夏两季的热舒适度和皮肤温度监测实验。冬季和夏季的实验温度分别为 12 ℃-24 ℃ 和 24 ℃-32 ℃。通过费舍尔判别分析,为八个部位的局部皮肤温度建立了热舒适度评估模型。使用精确度和假阴性率(FNR)对所开发模型的性能进行了评估。结果表明,左手背、左手腕和左前臂皮肤温度的热舒适度评价精确度高于其他部位,而假阴性率则低于其他部位,适合用于热舒适度评价。左胸部皮肤温度的精确度最低,FNR 最高,不适合进行热舒适度评估。通过合理选择身体部位,使用单点皮肤温度评估热舒适度比使用平均皮肤温度更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Validation of large eddy simulations in urban wind studies using a new overall area metric Assessment of dust endotoxins, airborne bacteria, and PM2.5 at old-age nursing homes and children's daycare centers in the Seoul metropolitan area, South Korea Contextual evaluation of the impact of dynamic urban window view content on view satisfaction Challenges and future directions in evaporative cooling: Balancing sustainable cooling with microbial safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1