Landslide-bridge interaction: Insights from an extensive database of Italian case studies

IF 4.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International journal of disaster risk reduction Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104983
Diana Salciarini , Erica Cernuto , Giulia Capati , Francesca Dezi , Lorenzo Brezzi , Fabiola Gibin , Fabio Gabrieli , Stefano Stacul , Angelo Doglioni , Arianna Lupattelli , Nunziante Squeglia , Vincenzo Simeone , Paolo Simonini
{"title":"Landslide-bridge interaction: Insights from an extensive database of Italian case studies","authors":"Diana Salciarini ,&nbsp;Erica Cernuto ,&nbsp;Giulia Capati ,&nbsp;Francesca Dezi ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Brezzi ,&nbsp;Fabiola Gibin ,&nbsp;Fabio Gabrieli ,&nbsp;Stefano Stacul ,&nbsp;Angelo Doglioni ,&nbsp;Arianna Lupattelli ,&nbsp;Nunziante Squeglia ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Simeone ,&nbsp;Paolo Simonini","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the wealth of documented case studies, systematic approaches to correlate landslide characteristics with the damage they cause to bridges are rare. The correlation is challenging due to the complexity of landslides, which can vary in movement types, volume, velocities, materials, and orientations. Additionally, the lack of universally applicable models to forecast bridge responses in case of landslide interaction adds complexity. Recognizing the urgency of addressing this challenge, various countries, including Italy, have introduced guidelines and strategies to manage infrastructure risks and enhance safety. Efforts are underway to develop practical tools for authorities and infrastructure managers, encompassing factors influencing bridge response, especially under the action of natural hazards. This article presents a database of landslide-bridge interactions in Italy, developed under the FABRE Consortium. The database was compiled by analysing 382 bridges across 12 Italian regions. The article explores correlations between landslide characteristics and risk classification for bridges, defined as “Landslide Class of Attention” (L-CoA). The analysis shows that landslide volume is directly correlated with L-CoA severity, with larger volumes leading to higher classifications. Very slow-moving landslides are prevalent in high-risk L-CoA categories, suggesting they are associated with significant volumes and severe consequences. Complete interference between landslides and infrastructure poses the highest risk, while partial interference also contributes significantly. Combined landslides tend to result in more severe L-CoA classifications. The findings underscore the importance of better understanding the interactions between landslides and bridges, to develop predictive models and mitigate the risks posed by landslides to infrastructure in Italy and beyond.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 104983"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420924007453","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the wealth of documented case studies, systematic approaches to correlate landslide characteristics with the damage they cause to bridges are rare. The correlation is challenging due to the complexity of landslides, which can vary in movement types, volume, velocities, materials, and orientations. Additionally, the lack of universally applicable models to forecast bridge responses in case of landslide interaction adds complexity. Recognizing the urgency of addressing this challenge, various countries, including Italy, have introduced guidelines and strategies to manage infrastructure risks and enhance safety. Efforts are underway to develop practical tools for authorities and infrastructure managers, encompassing factors influencing bridge response, especially under the action of natural hazards. This article presents a database of landslide-bridge interactions in Italy, developed under the FABRE Consortium. The database was compiled by analysing 382 bridges across 12 Italian regions. The article explores correlations between landslide characteristics and risk classification for bridges, defined as “Landslide Class of Attention” (L-CoA). The analysis shows that landslide volume is directly correlated with L-CoA severity, with larger volumes leading to higher classifications. Very slow-moving landslides are prevalent in high-risk L-CoA categories, suggesting they are associated with significant volumes and severe consequences. Complete interference between landslides and infrastructure poses the highest risk, while partial interference also contributes significantly. Combined landslides tend to result in more severe L-CoA classifications. The findings underscore the importance of better understanding the interactions between landslides and bridges, to develop predictive models and mitigate the risks posed by landslides to infrastructure in Italy and beyond.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
滑坡与桥梁的相互作用:从广泛的意大利案例研究数据库中获得的启示
尽管记录了大量的案例研究,但将滑坡特征与滑坡对桥梁造成的破坏相关联的系统方法却很少见。由于山体滑坡的复杂性,其运动类型、体积、速度、材料和方向各不相同,因此关联具有挑战性。此外,缺乏普遍适用的模型来预测桥梁在滑坡作用下的反应,这也增加了复杂性。认识到应对这一挑战的紧迫性,包括意大利在内的多个国家已推出了管理基础设施风险和提高安全性的指导方针和战略。目前正在努力为当局和基础设施管理者开发实用工具,其中包括影响桥梁响应的因素,特别是在自然灾害作用下的响应。本文介绍了在 FABRE 财团下开发的意大利滑坡-桥梁相互作用数据库。该数据库是通过分析意大利 12 个大区的 382 座桥梁编制而成的。文章探讨了滑坡特征与桥梁风险分类(定义为 "滑坡关注等级"(L-CoA))之间的相关性。分析表明,滑坡体积与 L-CoA 严重程度直接相关,体积越大,分类越高。在高风险 L-CoA 类别中,移动速度非常缓慢的滑坡非常普遍,这表明它们与巨大的体积和严重的后果相关。山体滑坡与基础设施之间的完全干扰风险最高,而部分干扰也有很大影响。合并滑坡往往会导致更严重的 L-CoA 分类。这些发现强调了更好地了解山体滑坡与桥梁之间的相互作用的重要性,以便开发预测模型并降低山体滑坡对意大利及其他国家的基础设施造成的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of tangible coastal inundation damage related to critical infrastructure and buildings: The case of Mauritius Island Geospatial analysis of alarmingly increasing flood vulnerability and disaster risk within the northeast himalaya region of India Cues facilitating collective sensemaking during emergencies: Gaps, inconsistencies, and indicators Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of flood resilience in Beibu Gulf Urban Agglomeration Urban flood hazard insights from multiple perspectives based on internet of things sensor data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1