Systematizing risk assessment and responses to combustible dust from explosive characteristics

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105475
Yu-Chi Cheng , Gan-Syue Guo , Yih-Wen Wang , Chi-Min Shu
{"title":"Systematizing risk assessment and responses to combustible dust from explosive characteristics","authors":"Yu-Chi Cheng ,&nbsp;Gan-Syue Guo ,&nbsp;Yih-Wen Wang ,&nbsp;Chi-Min Shu","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A systematic approach to defining dust explosion risks is presented, utilizing key parameters: minimum ignition energy (<em>MIE</em>), minimum ignition temperature of dust clouds (<em>MITC</em>), minimum explosion concentration (<em>MEC</em>), maximum explosion overpressure (<em>P</em><sub>max</sub>), and the dust explosion characteristic index (<em>K</em><sub>st</sub>). These parameters form the basis for robustly assessing combustible dust explosion risks. Drawing on experimental findings, a safety evaluation method empowering plant operators to directly assess the safety of dust-handling processes was devised, ensuring effective dust explosion prevention. Evaluation of three common dust samples (aluminium, polyethene, and lycopodium) revealed varying explosion risks. Through comparative analysis with existing literature, this study aligns risk definitions, proposing a scoring method for process safety controls to effectively mitigate dust cloud explosion risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 105475"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095042302400233X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A systematic approach to defining dust explosion risks is presented, utilizing key parameters: minimum ignition energy (MIE), minimum ignition temperature of dust clouds (MITC), minimum explosion concentration (MEC), maximum explosion overpressure (Pmax), and the dust explosion characteristic index (Kst). These parameters form the basis for robustly assessing combustible dust explosion risks. Drawing on experimental findings, a safety evaluation method empowering plant operators to directly assess the safety of dust-handling processes was devised, ensuring effective dust explosion prevention. Evaluation of three common dust samples (aluminium, polyethene, and lycopodium) revealed varying explosion risks. Through comparative analysis with existing literature, this study aligns risk definitions, proposing a scoring method for process safety controls to effectively mitigate dust cloud explosion risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爆炸特性可燃粉尘风险评估和应对措施系统化
利用关键参数:最小点火能量 (MIE)、尘云最小点火温度 (MITC)、最小爆炸浓度 (MEC)、最大爆炸超压 (Pmax) 和粉尘爆炸特性指数 (Kst),提出了一种界定粉尘爆炸风险的系统方法。这些参数构成了可靠评估可燃粉尘爆炸风险的基础。根据实验结果,设计了一种安全评估方法,使工厂操作人员能够直接评估粉尘处理过程的安全性,确保有效预防粉尘爆炸。对三种常见粉尘样本(铝、聚乙烯和茄碱)的评估显示了不同的爆炸风险。通过与现有文献的对比分析,本研究调整了风险定义,提出了工艺安全控制的评分方法,以有效降低粉尘云爆炸风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
期刊最新文献
Direct determination of turbulent burning velocity during aluminum flame propagation: A comparison of three experimental methods Risk assessment of domino effects under fire and explosion accidents in LNG storage tank farms based on Bayesian network Editorial Board Learning from incidents in petrochemical companies in Brazil Risk assessment of flammable liquid transportation on waterways: An ontology-driven dynamic Bayesian network approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1