Multi-objective optimisation of ORC–LNG systems using the novel One-shot Optimisation method

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2024.133629
Han Zhang, Giovanna Cavazzini, Alberto Benato
{"title":"Multi-objective optimisation of ORC–LNG systems using the novel One-shot Optimisation method","authors":"Han Zhang,&nbsp;Giovanna Cavazzini,&nbsp;Alberto Benato","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2024.133629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Optimisation is drawing more and more attention in the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) research field. However, as the complexity of the ORC scenarios increases, it poses challenges on operational parameter, working fluid, and configuration optimisation levels. This work first proposes an improved optimisation method, termed the One-shot Optimisation (OSO) method, which can simultaneously optimise the working fluid and configuration. Then, a two-objective optimisation is performed using the OSO method in combined ORC–LNG systems, considering up to eight operational parameters, 11 working fluids, and 16 system configurations to maximise energy efficiency and minimise the electricity production cost (EPC). Finally, the result of the optimisation is divided according to the thermodynamic weight (W<sub>1</sub>), and two typical conditions are analysed in detail: the maximum case (W<sub>1</sub> = 1) and the balanced case (W<sub>1</sub> = 0.5). The results show that the OSO method is capable of identifying the optimal working fluid and optimal configuration within a single optimisation process. The basic ORC configuration is preferred when W<sub>1</sub> is lower while the recuperative ORC is preferred when W<sub>1</sub> is higher. The balanced case can achieve an energy efficiency comparable to that of the maximum case but with a significantly lower EPC. The balanced case can achieve as much as 87. 48% of energy efficiency, requiring only 19.77% of the EPC compared to those of the maximum case.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"313 ","pages":"Article 133629"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224034078","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimisation is drawing more and more attention in the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) research field. However, as the complexity of the ORC scenarios increases, it poses challenges on operational parameter, working fluid, and configuration optimisation levels. This work first proposes an improved optimisation method, termed the One-shot Optimisation (OSO) method, which can simultaneously optimise the working fluid and configuration. Then, a two-objective optimisation is performed using the OSO method in combined ORC–LNG systems, considering up to eight operational parameters, 11 working fluids, and 16 system configurations to maximise energy efficiency and minimise the electricity production cost (EPC). Finally, the result of the optimisation is divided according to the thermodynamic weight (W1), and two typical conditions are analysed in detail: the maximum case (W1 = 1) and the balanced case (W1 = 0.5). The results show that the OSO method is capable of identifying the optimal working fluid and optimal configuration within a single optimisation process. The basic ORC configuration is preferred when W1 is lower while the recuperative ORC is preferred when W1 is higher. The balanced case can achieve an energy efficiency comparable to that of the maximum case but with a significantly lower EPC. The balanced case can achieve as much as 87. 48% of energy efficiency, requiring only 19.77% of the EPC compared to those of the maximum case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用新型 "一次优化法 "对 ORC-LNG 系统进行多目标优化
在有机郎肯循环(ORC)研究领域,优化正引起越来越多的关注。然而,随着有机郎肯循环方案复杂性的增加,它在运行参数、工作流体和配置优化层面提出了挑战。本研究首先提出了一种改进的优化方法,即 "一次优化法"(OSO),它可以同时优化工作流体和配置。然后,在 ORC-LNG 组合系统中使用 OSO 方法进行了双目标优化,考虑了多达 8 个运行参数、11 种工作流体和 16 种系统配置,以实现能源效率最大化和发电成本(EPC)最小化。最后,根据热力学权重(W1)对优化结果进行了划分,并详细分析了两种典型情况:最大情况(W1 = 1)和平衡情况(W1 = 0.5)。结果表明,OSO 方法能够在一个优化过程中确定最佳工作流体和最佳配置。当 W1 较低时,基本 ORC 配置更受青睐,而当 W1 较高时,恢复性 ORC 更受青睐。平衡型情况下的能效与最高型情况下的能效相当,但 EPC 明显较低。平衡型可实现高达 87.48% 的能效,所需的 EPC 仅为最大值的 19.77%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
期刊最新文献
Comments on “Uncertainties in estimating production costs of future nuclear technologies: A model-based analysis of small modular reactors” [Energy 281 (2023) 128204] High temperature heat pumps for industrial heating processes using water as refrigerant Exploration on deep pulverized coal activation and ultra-low NOx emission strategies with novel purifying-combustion technology Collaborative strategy towards a resilient urban energy system: Evidence from a tripartite evolutionary game model Household, sociodemographic, building and land cover factors affecting residential summer electricity consumption: A systematic statistical study in Phoenix, AZ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1