Responses of soil microbial community characteristics and enzyme activities to different irrigation modes over four wheat-maize rotation seasons

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agricultural Water Management Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109166
Dongfeng Ning, Qisheng Han, Yingying Zhang, Anzhen Qin, Zhandong Liu, Jiyang Zhang, Yang Gao
{"title":"Responses of soil microbial community characteristics and enzyme activities to different irrigation modes over four wheat-maize rotation seasons","authors":"Dongfeng Ning,&nbsp;Qisheng Han,&nbsp;Yingying Zhang,&nbsp;Anzhen Qin,&nbsp;Zhandong Liu,&nbsp;Jiyang Zhang,&nbsp;Yang Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water scarcity in arid and semiarid areas highlights the importance of developing water-saving irrigation techniques. Soil extracellular enzyme activities (EEAs) and microbes are important for soil biochemical cycles and plant growth. However, little is understood about how soil EEAs, and microbial communities respond to water-saving irrigation systems and levels. Therefore, a field experiment was carried out over four consecutive wheat-maize seasons to explore the effects of surface irrigation (SI) and drip irrigation (DI) coupled with different irrigation levels (i.e. 65, 50, 35 and 20 mm/event, represents sufficient, mild deficit, moderate deficit and serious deficit irrigation, respectively) on the plant biomass, soil properties, soil EEAs, and bacterial community. The results revealed that mild deficit irrigation showed no significant impact on plant biomass, serious and moderate deficit irrigation significantly decreased crop biomass by 49.0 % and 26.6 %, respectively, compared with sufficient irrigation. However, the crop biomass of serious and moderate deficit irrigation under DI were 15.4 % and 17.4 % higher, respectively, than that under SI. Serious and moderate deficit irrigation significantly increased soil available K accumulation and soil urease activity, decreased bacterial richness, and shifted the bacterial community structure. No significant differences were found between mild deficit and sufficient irrigation. The relative abundances of <em>Firmicutes, Gemmatimonadota,</em> and <em>Myxococcota</em> significantly increased under serious deficit irrigation<em>,</em> while <em>Acidobacteriota</em> significantly decreased<em>.</em> Moderate deficit irrigation under DI did not shift bacterial community structure, while under SI did. Soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), available K, and plant biomass were the major factors influencing the bacterial community compositions. Serious deficit irrigation reduced the complexity and stability of the soil bacterial co-occurrence network. The network of DI had more significant interactions among bacteria than the SI. Therefore, DI coupled with moderate deficit irrigation is more beneficial to maintain crop yield and the stability of bacterial community structure than SI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"306 ","pages":"Article 109166"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837742400502X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water scarcity in arid and semiarid areas highlights the importance of developing water-saving irrigation techniques. Soil extracellular enzyme activities (EEAs) and microbes are important for soil biochemical cycles and plant growth. However, little is understood about how soil EEAs, and microbial communities respond to water-saving irrigation systems and levels. Therefore, a field experiment was carried out over four consecutive wheat-maize seasons to explore the effects of surface irrigation (SI) and drip irrigation (DI) coupled with different irrigation levels (i.e. 65, 50, 35 and 20 mm/event, represents sufficient, mild deficit, moderate deficit and serious deficit irrigation, respectively) on the plant biomass, soil properties, soil EEAs, and bacterial community. The results revealed that mild deficit irrigation showed no significant impact on plant biomass, serious and moderate deficit irrigation significantly decreased crop biomass by 49.0 % and 26.6 %, respectively, compared with sufficient irrigation. However, the crop biomass of serious and moderate deficit irrigation under DI were 15.4 % and 17.4 % higher, respectively, than that under SI. Serious and moderate deficit irrigation significantly increased soil available K accumulation and soil urease activity, decreased bacterial richness, and shifted the bacterial community structure. No significant differences were found between mild deficit and sufficient irrigation. The relative abundances of Firmicutes, Gemmatimonadota, and Myxococcota significantly increased under serious deficit irrigation, while Acidobacteriota significantly decreased. Moderate deficit irrigation under DI did not shift bacterial community structure, while under SI did. Soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), available K, and plant biomass were the major factors influencing the bacterial community compositions. Serious deficit irrigation reduced the complexity and stability of the soil bacterial co-occurrence network. The network of DI had more significant interactions among bacteria than the SI. Therefore, DI coupled with moderate deficit irrigation is more beneficial to maintain crop yield and the stability of bacterial community structure than SI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四个小麦-玉米轮作季节中不同灌溉模式对土壤微生物群落特征和酶活性的影响
干旱和半干旱地区的缺水问题凸显了开发节水灌溉技术的重要性。土壤胞外酶活性(EEAs)和微生物对土壤生化循环和植物生长非常重要。然而,人们对土壤 EEAs 和微生物群落如何响应节水灌溉系统和水平知之甚少。因此,在连续四季的小麦-玉米田间试验中,探讨了地表灌溉(SI)和滴灌(DI)结合不同灌溉水平(即 65、50、35 和 20 毫米/次,分别代表充足灌溉、轻度亏缺灌溉、中度亏缺灌溉和严重亏缺灌溉)对植物生物量、土壤性质、土壤 EEAs 和细菌群落的影响。结果表明,与充足灌溉相比,轻度亏缺灌溉对植物生物量没有显著影响,严重亏缺灌溉和中度亏缺灌溉使作物生物量分别显著减少了 49.0% 和 26.6%。然而,在 DI 条件下,严重和中度亏缺灌溉的作物生物量分别比 SI 条件下高 15.4 % 和 17.4 %。严重和中度亏缺灌溉显著增加了土壤可利用钾的积累和土壤脲酶活性,降低了细菌丰富度,并改变了细菌群落结构。轻度亏缺灌溉和充分灌溉之间无明显差异。在严重亏缺灌溉条件下,固氮菌群、革囊菌群和粘球菌群的相对丰度明显增加,而酸性杆菌群则明显减少。DI 条件下的中度亏缺灌溉没有改变细菌群落结构,而 SI 条件下则有所改变。土壤 pH 值、导电率(EC)、可利用钾和植物生物量是影响细菌群落组成的主要因素。严重亏缺灌溉降低了土壤细菌共生网络的复杂性和稳定性。DI 网络中细菌之间的相互作用比 SI 更为显著。因此,直接灌溉加上适度亏缺灌溉比直接灌溉更有利于保持作物产量和细菌群落结构的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
期刊最新文献
Influences of residual stomatal conductance on the intrinsic water use efficiency of two C3 and two C4 species Accurate irrigation decision-making of winter wheat at the filling stage based on UAV hyperspectral inversion of leaf water content Comparative analysis of machine learning models and explainable AI for agriculture drought prediction: A case study of the Ta-pieh mountains Intermittent sprinkler irrigation during the establishment of strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) bare-root transplants conserves water without loss of yield and fruit quality Biochar enhances soil hydrological function by improving the pore structure of saline soil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1