To disclose or to conceal? Comparison of different disclosure policies in queues with loss-averse customers

IF 7.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Expert Systems with Applications Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125635
Jian Cao , Yongjiang Guo
{"title":"To disclose or to conceal? Comparison of different disclosure policies in queues with loss-averse customers","authors":"Jian Cao ,&nbsp;Yongjiang Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In many service industries, information disclosure about the product can alleviate customers’ loss aversion induced by uncertain product valuation. In this paper, we consider a single-server queueing system in which the manager who privately learns the valuation information discloses the valuation information strategically to loss-averse customers. We investigate the impact of the customers’ loss aversion on the system’s equilibrium arrival rate and the manager’s optimal disclosure policy. We find that loss aversion restrains customers from joining the queue. Surprisingly, we find that there is no one disclosure policy that always prevails over other disclosure policies. Specifically, the full disclosure policy is optimal only when the valuation is large and the degree of loss aversion is moderate. The full non-disclosure policy is optimal when the degree of loss aversion is too large or too small, or the valuation is small. The threshold disclosure policy is optimal when the valuation and the degree of loss aversion are moderate. Furthermore, under the threshold disclosure policy, the increasing degree of loss aversion makes managers be more reluctant to disclose the valuation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50461,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems with Applications","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 125635"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417424025028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many service industries, information disclosure about the product can alleviate customers’ loss aversion induced by uncertain product valuation. In this paper, we consider a single-server queueing system in which the manager who privately learns the valuation information discloses the valuation information strategically to loss-averse customers. We investigate the impact of the customers’ loss aversion on the system’s equilibrium arrival rate and the manager’s optimal disclosure policy. We find that loss aversion restrains customers from joining the queue. Surprisingly, we find that there is no one disclosure policy that always prevails over other disclosure policies. Specifically, the full disclosure policy is optimal only when the valuation is large and the degree of loss aversion is moderate. The full non-disclosure policy is optimal when the degree of loss aversion is too large or too small, or the valuation is small. The threshold disclosure policy is optimal when the valuation and the degree of loss aversion are moderate. Furthermore, under the threshold disclosure policy, the increasing degree of loss aversion makes managers be more reluctant to disclose the valuation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
披露还是隐瞒?比较有损失规避型顾客的排队过程中的不同披露政策
在许多服务行业中,披露产品信息可以减轻客户因产品估值不确定而产生的损失厌恶情绪。在本文中,我们考虑了一个单服务器排队系统,在该系统中,私下了解估值信息的经理会策略性地向损失规避型客户披露估值信息。我们研究了客户的损失规避对系统均衡到达率和经理的最优披露策略的影响。我们发现,损失厌恶会抑制客户加入队列。令人惊讶的是,我们发现没有一种披露政策总是优于其他披露政策。具体来说,只有当估值较大且损失厌恶程度适中时,完全披露政策才是最优的。当损失规避程度过大或过小,或者估值较小时,完全不披露政策是最优的。当估值和损失规避程度适中时,阈值披露政策是最优的。此外,在临界披露政策下,损失规避程度的增加会使管理者更不愿意披露估值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Systems with Applications
Expert Systems with Applications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
10.60%
发文量
2045
审稿时长
8.7 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems With Applications is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information on expert and intelligent systems used globally in industry, government, and universities. The journal emphasizes original papers covering the design, development, testing, implementation, and management of these systems, offering practical guidelines. It spans various sectors such as finance, engineering, marketing, law, project management, information management, medicine, and more. The journal also welcomes papers on multi-agent systems, knowledge management, neural networks, knowledge discovery, data mining, and other related areas, excluding applications to military/defense systems.
期刊最新文献
Towards optimal control of HPV model using safe reinforcement learning with actor–critic neural networks Deep hashing with mutual information: A comprehensive strategy for image retrieval Maximizing failure occurrence in water distribution Systems: A Multi-Objective approach considering Reliability, Economic, and environmental aspects Multi-objective grey wolf optimizer based on reinforcement learning for distributed hybrid flowshop scheduling towards mass personalized manufacturing Multi-Context enhanced Lane-Changing prediction using a heterogeneous Graph Neural Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1