Jordan F. Fields , Carl E. Renshaw , Evan N. Dethier , Francis J. Magilligan
{"title":"The longer arc of channel recovery post-dam removal","authors":"Jordan F. Fields , Carl E. Renshaw , Evan N. Dethier , Francis J. Magilligan","doi":"10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dam removals are opportunistic experiments to address fundamental questions about river recovery to disturbance. Previous studies have shown that gravel-bedded rivers are resilient with covariate adjustments to channel dimensions occurring rapidly in the wake of disturbance. Yet, beyond the cross section, at the reach or watershed-scale, adjustment appears to take much longer. Understanding of the longer arc of reach and watershed recovery is limited by the relatively few dam removals studies that include long-term monitoring. Here, we present results from a five-year dam removal study punctuated by an extreme flood and show that the initial, rapid response of a channel is driven by the prevailing hydrology whereas longer-term adjustments to morphology at the reach scale are driven by external forces imposed on the channel. We summarize these results by classifying various channel features as either ‘intrinsic channel properties’ that are rapidly adjustable by the prevailing hydrology or ‘extrinsic channel properties’ that respond over various time scales to external boundary conditions imposed on the channel by climate, vegetation, geology, and valley dimensions (extrinsic controls). We show that this framework applies to channel recovery beyond the former reservoir and thus may prove applicable to channel disturbances beyond dam removal, such as extreme floods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55115,"journal":{"name":"Geomorphology","volume":"468 ","pages":"Article 109442"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomorphology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X24003945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dam removals are opportunistic experiments to address fundamental questions about river recovery to disturbance. Previous studies have shown that gravel-bedded rivers are resilient with covariate adjustments to channel dimensions occurring rapidly in the wake of disturbance. Yet, beyond the cross section, at the reach or watershed-scale, adjustment appears to take much longer. Understanding of the longer arc of reach and watershed recovery is limited by the relatively few dam removals studies that include long-term monitoring. Here, we present results from a five-year dam removal study punctuated by an extreme flood and show that the initial, rapid response of a channel is driven by the prevailing hydrology whereas longer-term adjustments to morphology at the reach scale are driven by external forces imposed on the channel. We summarize these results by classifying various channel features as either ‘intrinsic channel properties’ that are rapidly adjustable by the prevailing hydrology or ‘extrinsic channel properties’ that respond over various time scales to external boundary conditions imposed on the channel by climate, vegetation, geology, and valley dimensions (extrinsic controls). We show that this framework applies to channel recovery beyond the former reservoir and thus may prove applicable to channel disturbances beyond dam removal, such as extreme floods.
期刊介绍:
Our journal''s scope includes geomorphic themes of: tectonics and regional structure; glacial processes and landforms; fluvial sequences, Quaternary environmental change and dating; fluvial processes and landforms; mass movement, slopes and periglacial processes; hillslopes and soil erosion; weathering, karst and soils; aeolian processes and landforms, coastal dunes and arid environments; coastal and marine processes, estuaries and lakes; modelling, theoretical and quantitative geomorphology; DEM, GIS and remote sensing methods and applications; hazards, applied and planetary geomorphology; and volcanics.