Jiaqi Qian , Ge Wang , Ting Yin , Yuxuan Mao , Siyuan Chen , Yan Li , Jiangfeng Liu , Qi Zhang
{"title":"Policy implications of electrifying land freight transport towards carbon-neutral in China","authors":"Jiaqi Qian , Ge Wang , Ting Yin , Yuxuan Mao , Siyuan Chen , Yan Li , Jiangfeng Liu , Qi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electrification is currently the most promising technology for decarbonizing the land transport sector in China. Economic incentives and regulatory measures have been proposed or adopted to promote electric trucks and trains. However, the policy pathway to carbon neutrality and its costs and benefits remain unclear. An integrated dynamic economic-environmental assessment model for the land freight transport sector is proposed and applied to simulate the impact of different policy pathways during 2021–2060. The results show that China's land freight transport sector could reach carbon peak between 2029 and 2040, while becoming carbon neutral by 2060, with the average carbon abatement cost ranging from 2346 to 61 RMB/t. Due to the high carbon intensity of the current electricity system and the high cost of electric trucks, promoting electrification in the land freight transport sector before 2031 is neither economic nor environmentally friendly. However, from a long-term perspective, the hurry-up electrification could save 5.34 Gt of the total carbon budget at the cost of emitting 0.49 Gt more CO<sub>2</sub> in the first decade (2021–2030) and spending 74.42 trillion RMB more in accumulated investment compared to the delayed electrification scenario. Policymakers should pay attention to such trade-offs between short-term and long-term benefits. The impacts of other key features of the policy pathway towards carbon neutrality of the land freight sector, such as the road-to-tail ratio and the growth rate of freight turnover, were also analyzed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"160 ","pages":"Pages 116-124"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X24003354","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Electrification is currently the most promising technology for decarbonizing the land transport sector in China. Economic incentives and regulatory measures have been proposed or adopted to promote electric trucks and trains. However, the policy pathway to carbon neutrality and its costs and benefits remain unclear. An integrated dynamic economic-environmental assessment model for the land freight transport sector is proposed and applied to simulate the impact of different policy pathways during 2021–2060. The results show that China's land freight transport sector could reach carbon peak between 2029 and 2040, while becoming carbon neutral by 2060, with the average carbon abatement cost ranging from 2346 to 61 RMB/t. Due to the high carbon intensity of the current electricity system and the high cost of electric trucks, promoting electrification in the land freight transport sector before 2031 is neither economic nor environmentally friendly. However, from a long-term perspective, the hurry-up electrification could save 5.34 Gt of the total carbon budget at the cost of emitting 0.49 Gt more CO2 in the first decade (2021–2030) and spending 74.42 trillion RMB more in accumulated investment compared to the delayed electrification scenario. Policymakers should pay attention to such trade-offs between short-term and long-term benefits. The impacts of other key features of the policy pathway towards carbon neutrality of the land freight sector, such as the road-to-tail ratio and the growth rate of freight turnover, were also analyzed.
期刊介绍:
Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.