Thermodynamic performance comparison of calcium looping processes for post-combustion capture: Influence of CO2 enrichment routes among three heat supply methods

IF 5.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of The Energy Institute Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.joei.2024.101878
Song He , Lifan Gao , Yawen Zheng , Junyao Wang , Dongtai Yang , Xuelan Zeng
{"title":"Thermodynamic performance comparison of calcium looping processes for post-combustion capture: Influence of CO2 enrichment routes among three heat supply methods","authors":"Song He ,&nbsp;Lifan Gao ,&nbsp;Yawen Zheng ,&nbsp;Junyao Wang ,&nbsp;Dongtai Yang ,&nbsp;Xuelan Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.joei.2024.101878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Calcium looping process is recognized as a promising option for low-energy consumption post-combustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture. This paper introduced three calcium looping processes with different fossil-fuel-based heat supply methods including air combustion (CaL-AC), oxy-fuel combustion (CaL-Oxy), and chemical looping combustion (CaL-CLC). The sensitivities of key parameters on system performance are investigated, and the detailed energy analysis is conducted to reveal the thermodynamic performance difference. Results show that the changes of the average CaO conversion ratio and the solids make-up ratio bring about drastic variation of energy distributions and the specific primary energy consumption for CO<sub>2</sub> avoidance (SPECCA) in the CaL-AC process. While temperature difference of supplying heat for calcination has a significant influence on the system performance of the CaL-CLC process. Besides, eliminating air preheating leads to the increase of the SPECCA from 3.12 MJ/kg CO<sub>2</sub> to 4.53 MJ/kg CO<sub>2</sub> in the CaL-AC process, which is inferior than that in the CaL-Oxy process. Furthermore, the minimum CO<sub>2</sub> enrichment work of different pathways is examined. The unit minimum enrichment work in the CaL-CLC process is 9.92 kJ/mol CO<sub>2</sub>, lower than those in the other two processes due to the avoidance of minimum enrichment work for fuel decarbonization. Through reaction coupling, the Gibbs free energy of the combustion reaction offsets the minimum work required for O<sub>2</sub> release, thereby avoiding the minimum separation work. In post-combustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture processes, avoiding the CO<sub>2</sub> enrichment work requirement during fossil fuel conversion will offer another way to reduce energy consumption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Energy Institute","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 101878"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Energy Institute","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743967124003568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Calcium looping process is recognized as a promising option for low-energy consumption post-combustion CO2 capture. This paper introduced three calcium looping processes with different fossil-fuel-based heat supply methods including air combustion (CaL-AC), oxy-fuel combustion (CaL-Oxy), and chemical looping combustion (CaL-CLC). The sensitivities of key parameters on system performance are investigated, and the detailed energy analysis is conducted to reveal the thermodynamic performance difference. Results show that the changes of the average CaO conversion ratio and the solids make-up ratio bring about drastic variation of energy distributions and the specific primary energy consumption for CO2 avoidance (SPECCA) in the CaL-AC process. While temperature difference of supplying heat for calcination has a significant influence on the system performance of the CaL-CLC process. Besides, eliminating air preheating leads to the increase of the SPECCA from 3.12 MJ/kg CO2 to 4.53 MJ/kg CO2 in the CaL-AC process, which is inferior than that in the CaL-Oxy process. Furthermore, the minimum CO2 enrichment work of different pathways is examined. The unit minimum enrichment work in the CaL-CLC process is 9.92 kJ/mol CO2, lower than those in the other two processes due to the avoidance of minimum enrichment work for fuel decarbonization. Through reaction coupling, the Gibbs free energy of the combustion reaction offsets the minimum work required for O2 release, thereby avoiding the minimum separation work. In post-combustion CO2 capture processes, avoiding the CO2 enrichment work requirement during fossil fuel conversion will offer another way to reduce energy consumption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于燃烧后捕集的钙循环工艺的热力学性能比较:三种供热方法中二氧化碳富集路线的影响
钙循环工艺被认为是一种低能耗的燃烧后二氧化碳捕集技术。本文介绍了三种不同化石燃料供热方式的钙循环工艺,包括空气燃烧(CaL-AC)、富氧燃烧(CaL-Oxy)和化学循环燃烧(CaL-CLC)。研究了关键参数对系统性能的敏感性,并进行了详细的能量分析,以揭示热力学性能差异。结果表明,在 CaL-AC 过程中,平均 CaO 转化率和固体配比的变化会带来能量分布和避免二氧化碳排放的一次能源消耗量(SPECCA)的急剧变化。而煅烧供热温差对 CaL-CLC 工艺的系统性能有很大影响。此外,取消空气预热会导致 CaL-AC 工艺的 SPECCA 从 3.12 MJ/kg CO2 增加到 4.53 MJ/kg CO2,低于 CaL-Oxy 工艺。此外,还考察了不同途径的最小二氧化碳富集功。由于避免了燃料脱碳的最小富集功,CaL-CLC 工艺的单位最小富集功为 9.92 kJ/mol CO2,低于其他两种工艺。通过反应耦合,燃烧反应的吉布斯自由能抵消了释放 O2 所需的最小功,从而避免了最小分离功。在燃烧后二氧化碳捕获过程中,避免化石燃料转化过程中所需的二氧化碳富集功将提供另一种降低能耗的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of The Energy Institute
Journal of The Energy Institute 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
166
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Energy Institute provides peer reviewed coverage of original high quality research on energy, engineering and technology.The coverage is broad and the main areas of interest include: Combustion engineering and associated technologies; process heating; power generation; engines and propulsion; emissions and environmental pollution control; clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies Emissions and environmental pollution control; safety and hazards; Clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies, including carbon capture and storage, CCS; Petroleum engineering and fuel quality, including storage and transport Alternative energy sources; biomass utilisation and biomass conversion technologies; energy from waste, incineration and recycling Energy conversion, energy recovery and energy efficiency; space heating, fuel cells, heat pumps and cooling systems Energy storage The journal''s coverage reflects changes in energy technology that result from the transition to more efficient energy production and end use together with reduced carbon emission.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Synergistic recovery of renewable hydrocarbon resources via co-pyrolysis of non-edible linseed and waste polypropylene: A study on influence of plastic on oil production and their utilization as a fuel for IC engine Comprehensive performance investigation of inexpensive oxygen carrier in chemical looping gasification of coal Cerium-induced modification of acid-base sites in Ni-zeolite catalysts for improved dry reforming of methane The impact of ignition and activation energy distribution on the combustion and emission characteristics of diesel-ammonia-natural gas engines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1