Bi-level multi-objective optimization for a hybrid carbon pricing initiative towards biomass co-firing with coal

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable Energy Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2024.121829
Qian Huang , Qing Feng
{"title":"Bi-level multi-objective optimization for a hybrid carbon pricing initiative towards biomass co-firing with coal","authors":"Qian Huang ,&nbsp;Qing Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coal-fired power generation is one of the major contributors to global carbon emissions. Biomass co-firing with coal is a cost-effective approach for carbon abatement. This paper formulates a hybrid carbon pricing initiative that combines an emission trading system (ETS) and a carbon tax, with ETS being applied to large power plants and carbon tax being applied to small power plants. A bi-level multi-objective optimization model is established to assist the multiple stakeholders to develop optimal strategies, and quantify environmental and economic impacts. In the proposed model, decision sequence from the authority to the coal-fired power plants is considered, and trade-offs between social welfare and carbon intensity is determined. Bi-level interactive fuzzy approach is adopted to search for satisfactory solutions. A case study is conducted to demonstrate the model’s practicality and efficiency, and the results reveal that this model is adequate for finding Stackelberg equilibrium between the hierarchical decision-makers with conflicting objectives. Sensitivity analyses are conducted to provide the stakeholders with reasonable and practical strategies under various situations. It is found that higher preferences for economic benefits and satisfactory degrees would increase carbon tax price. Management recommendations are provided to support the hybrid initiative for biomass co-firing with coal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 121829"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124018974","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coal-fired power generation is one of the major contributors to global carbon emissions. Biomass co-firing with coal is a cost-effective approach for carbon abatement. This paper formulates a hybrid carbon pricing initiative that combines an emission trading system (ETS) and a carbon tax, with ETS being applied to large power plants and carbon tax being applied to small power plants. A bi-level multi-objective optimization model is established to assist the multiple stakeholders to develop optimal strategies, and quantify environmental and economic impacts. In the proposed model, decision sequence from the authority to the coal-fired power plants is considered, and trade-offs between social welfare and carbon intensity is determined. Bi-level interactive fuzzy approach is adopted to search for satisfactory solutions. A case study is conducted to demonstrate the model’s practicality and efficiency, and the results reveal that this model is adequate for finding Stackelberg equilibrium between the hierarchical decision-makers with conflicting objectives. Sensitivity analyses are conducted to provide the stakeholders with reasonable and practical strategies under various situations. It is found that higher preferences for economic benefits and satisfactory degrees would increase carbon tax price. Management recommendations are provided to support the hybrid initiative for biomass co-firing with coal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对生物质与煤炭混合燃烧的混合碳定价倡议的双层多目标优化
燃煤发电是造成全球碳排放的主要因素之一。生物质与煤炭联合燃烧是一种具有成本效益的碳减排方法。本文提出了一种混合碳定价方案,将排放交易体系(ETS)和碳税相结合,其中排放交易体系适用于大型发电厂,碳税适用于小型发电厂。本文建立了一个双层多目标优化模型,以帮助多方利益相关者制定最优策略,并量化对环境和经济的影响。在建议的模型中,考虑了从当局到燃煤发电厂的决策顺序,并确定了社会福利和碳强度之间的权衡。该模型采用双层互动模糊方法来寻找令人满意的解决方案。通过案例研究证明了该模型的实用性和高效性,结果表明该模型足以在目标相互冲突的分层决策者之间找到斯台克尔伯格均衡。敏感性分析为利益相关者提供了各种情况下合理实用的策略。结果发现,对经济效益和满意度的更高偏好将提高碳税价格。提出了支持生物质与煤炭混合燃烧的管理建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
1955
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices. As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.
期刊最新文献
Broadband efficient light-absorbing SS-PPy@CNT membranes prepared by electrochemical deposition for photothermal conversion Multi-objective optimization of geothermal heating systems based on thermal economy and environmental impact evaluation Dynamic response and power performance of a combined semi-submersible floating wind turbine and point absorber wave energy converter array Rural energy poverty alleviation in OECD nations: An integrated analysis of renewable energy, green taxation, and the United Nations agenda 2030 Spectral correction of photovoltaic module electrical properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1