Factors influencing whether safety management systems are living after extensive reforms: An analysis of four Norwegian county authorities

Tor-Olav Nævestad , Vibeke Milch , Jenny Blom , Rune Elvik , Markus Bugge , Håkon Endresen Normann , Erland Skogli , Lars Even Egner
{"title":"Factors influencing whether safety management systems are living after extensive reforms: An analysis of four Norwegian county authorities","authors":"Tor-Olav Nævestad ,&nbsp;Vibeke Milch ,&nbsp;Jenny Blom ,&nbsp;Rune Elvik ,&nbsp;Markus Bugge ,&nbsp;Håkon Endresen Normann ,&nbsp;Erland Skogli ,&nbsp;Lars Even Egner","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Norwegian county authorities’ management of road safety has undergone major changes since 2020, when a structural reform was implemented. County authorities merged into fewer administrative units, and took over the responsibility for administering the county roads. Because of this, county authorities had to establish new systems for managing road safety. The aims of the study are to examine: 1) Whether four county authorities have implemented living systems for road safety management, three years after the 2020 regional reform, and 2) Factors influencing whether safety management systems are living, including the impact of extensive reforms. The study is based on qualitative research interviews (n = 42) and an online survey (n = 392). The extent to which the county authorities have managed to implement living safety management systems and maintain their key road safety roles differs substantially. Multivariate analyses show that the most important factors influencing whether county authorities have been able to implement living systems are the safety cultures in the county authorities, and the extent to which respondents believe that the reorganizations related to the structural reform have required a lot of time and energy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 101241"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224002276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Norwegian county authorities’ management of road safety has undergone major changes since 2020, when a structural reform was implemented. County authorities merged into fewer administrative units, and took over the responsibility for administering the county roads. Because of this, county authorities had to establish new systems for managing road safety. The aims of the study are to examine: 1) Whether four county authorities have implemented living systems for road safety management, three years after the 2020 regional reform, and 2) Factors influencing whether safety management systems are living, including the impact of extensive reforms. The study is based on qualitative research interviews (n = 42) and an online survey (n = 392). The extent to which the county authorities have managed to implement living safety management systems and maintain their key road safety roles differs substantially. Multivariate analyses show that the most important factors influencing whether county authorities have been able to implement living systems are the safety cultures in the county authorities, and the extent to which respondents believe that the reorganizations related to the structural reform have required a lot of time and energy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响安全管理系统在广泛改革后是否有生命力的因素:对挪威四个县政府的分析
自 2020 年实施结构改革以来,挪威县政府对道路安全的管理发生了重大变化。县政府合并为更少的行政单位,并接管了管理县级道路的职责。因此,县政府必须建立新的道路安全管理制度。本研究旨在探讨1) 在 2020 年区域改革三年后,四个县政府是否实施了活的道路安全管理制度;2) 影响安全管理制度是否活的因素,包括广泛改革的影响。研究基于定性研究访谈(n = 42)和在线调查(n = 392)。各县当局在实施活的安全管理制度和保持其在道路安全方面的关键作用方面存在很大差异。多变量分析表明,影响县级政府能否实施活制度的最重要因素是县级政府的安全文化,以及受访者认为与结构改革相关的重组需要大量时间和精力的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Electric mobility investment in the power and transport sector coupling context: Lessons from Argentina, the Philippines, Poland and Romania Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand Disparities in ridehailing travel times for accessing non-work destinations Optimal bus reassignment considering in-vehicle overcrowding Drones for automated parcel delivery: Use case identification and derivation of technical requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1